From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
To: Marcin Bernatowicz <marcin.bernatowicz@linux.intel.com>,
igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: chris.p.wilson@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 6/8] benchmarks/gem_wsim: allow comments in workload description files
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2023 17:13:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <98157e3c-c908-72dd-1be3-664cdc3403aa@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230906155108.2175876-7-marcin.bernatowicz@linux.intel.com>
On 06/09/2023 16:51, Marcin Bernatowicz wrote:
> Lines starting with '#' are skipped.
> If command line step separator (',') is encountered after '#'
> it is replaced with ';' to not break parsing.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marcin Bernatowicz <marcin.bernatowicz@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> benchmarks/gem_wsim.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> benchmarks/wsim/README | 2 ++
> 2 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/benchmarks/gem_wsim.c b/benchmarks/gem_wsim.c
> index 0c1b58727..ec9fdc2d0 100644
> --- a/benchmarks/gem_wsim.c
> +++ b/benchmarks/gem_wsim.c
> @@ -43,6 +43,7 @@
> #include <limits.h>
> #include <pthread.h>
> #include <math.h>
> +#include <ctype.h>
>
> #include "drm.h"
> #include "drmtest.h"
> @@ -94,6 +95,7 @@ enum w_type {
> TERMINATE,
> SSEU,
> WORKINGSET,
> + SKIP,
> };
>
> struct dep_entry {
> @@ -930,6 +932,12 @@ parse_workload(struct w_arg *arg, unsigned int flags, double scale_dur,
> if (field) {
> fstart = NULL;
>
> + /* line starting with # is a comment */
> + if (field[0] == '#') {
> + step.type = SKIP;
> + goto add_step;
> + }
Do they need to be recorded as steps and couldn't be simply silently
skipped over while parsing?
How does relative step referencing works when comments are present?
(Batch implicit dependencies and 'a' and 's' commands.)
Regards,
Tvrtko
> +
> if (!strcmp(field, "d")) {
> int_field(DELAY, delay, tmp <= 0,
> "Invalid delay at step %u!\n");
> @@ -1194,7 +1202,8 @@ parse_workload(struct w_arg *arg, unsigned int flags, double scale_dur,
> if (field) {
> fstart = NULL;
>
> - check_arg(strlen(field) != 1 ||
> + check_arg(!strlen(field) ||
> + (strlen(field) > 1 && !isspace(field[1]) && field[1] != '#') ||
> (field[0] != '0' && field[0] != '1'),
> "Invalid wait boolean at step %u!\n",
> nr_steps);
> @@ -1208,18 +1217,23 @@ parse_workload(struct w_arg *arg, unsigned int flags, double scale_dur,
> step.type = BATCH;
>
> add_step:
> - if (step.type == DELAY)
> - step.delay = __duration(step.delay, scale_time);
> + if (step.type == SKIP) {
> + if (verbose > 3)
> + printf("skipped STEP: %s\n", _token);
> + } else {
> + if (step.type == DELAY)
> + step.delay = __duration(step.delay, scale_time);
>
> - step.idx = nr_steps++;
> - step.request = -1;
> - steps = realloc(steps, sizeof(step) * nr_steps);
> - igt_assert(steps);
> + step.idx = nr_steps++;
> + step.request = -1;
> + steps = realloc(steps, sizeof(step) * nr_steps);
> + igt_assert(steps);
>
> - memcpy(&steps[nr_steps - 1], &step, sizeof(step));
> + memcpy(&steps[nr_steps - 1], &step, sizeof(step));
> + }
>
> free(token);
> - }
> + } // while ((_token = strtok_r(tstart, ",", &tctx))) {
>
> if (app_w) {
> steps = realloc(steps, sizeof(step) *
> @@ -2304,6 +2318,8 @@ static void *run_workload(void *data)
> enum intel_engine_id engine = w->engine;
> int do_sleep = 0;
>
> + igt_assert(w->type != SKIP);
> +
> if (w->type == DELAY) {
> do_sleep = w->delay;
> } else if (w->type == PERIOD) {
> @@ -2543,6 +2559,13 @@ static char *load_workload_descriptor(char *filename)
> close(infd);
>
> for (i = 0; i < len; i++) {
> + /* '#' starts comment till end of line */
> + if (buf[i] == '#')
> + /* replace ',' in comments to not break parsing */
> + while (++i < len && buf[i] != '\n')
> + if (buf[i] == ',')
> + buf[i] = ';';
> +
> if (buf[i] == '\n')
> buf[i] = ',';
> }
> diff --git a/benchmarks/wsim/README b/benchmarks/wsim/README
> index 8c71f2fe6..e4fd61645 100644
> --- a/benchmarks/wsim/README
> +++ b/benchmarks/wsim/README
> @@ -1,6 +1,8 @@
> Workload descriptor format
> ==========================
>
> +Lines starting with '#' are treated as comments (do not create work step).
> +
> ctx.engine.duration_us.dependency.wait,...
> <uint>.<str>.<uint>[-<uint>]|*.<int <= 0>[/<int <= 0>][...].<0|1>,...
> B.<uint>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-20 16:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-06 15:51 [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 0/8] [RFC] benchmarks/gem_wsim: added basic xe support Marcin Bernatowicz
2023-09-06 15:51 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 1/8] lib/xe_spin: xe_spin_opts for xe_spin initialization Marcin Bernatowicz
2023-09-20 16:43 ` Kamil Konieczny
2023-09-21 15:08 ` Bernatowicz, Marcin
2023-09-06 15:51 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 2/8] lib/xe_spin: fixed duration xe_spin capability Marcin Bernatowicz
2023-09-06 15:51 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 3/8] lib/igt_device_scan: Xe get integrated/discrete card functions Marcin Bernatowicz
2023-09-06 15:51 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 4/8] benchmarks/gem_wsim: scale duration option fixes Marcin Bernatowicz
2023-09-20 16:06 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2023-09-06 15:51 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 5/8] benchmarks/gem_wsim: cleanups Marcin Bernatowicz
2023-09-06 15:51 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 6/8] benchmarks/gem_wsim: allow comments in workload description files Marcin Bernatowicz
2023-09-20 16:13 ` Tvrtko Ursulin [this message]
2023-09-21 15:05 ` Bernatowicz, Marcin
2023-09-21 15:22 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2023-09-21 16:20 ` Bernatowicz, Marcin
2023-09-25 9:03 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2023-09-06 15:51 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 7/8] benchmarks/gem_wsim: extract prepare_ctxs function, add w_sync Marcin Bernatowicz
2023-09-06 15:51 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 8/8] [RFC] benchmarks/gem_wsim: added basic xe support Marcin Bernatowicz
2023-09-21 15:57 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2023-09-21 19:39 ` Bernatowicz, Marcin
2023-09-25 9:16 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2023-09-06 21:01 ` [igt-dev] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for benchmarks/gem_wsim: added basic xe support (rev2) Patchwork
2023-09-07 9:30 ` Bernatowicz, Marcin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=98157e3c-c908-72dd-1be3-664cdc3403aa@linux.intel.com \
--to=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=chris.p.wilson@linux.intel.com \
--cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=marcin.bernatowicz@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox