public inbox for igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] runner: Also consider TAINT_MACHINE_CHECK as abortable taint
@ 2019-06-05 12:16 Petri Latvala
  2019-06-05 12:36 ` Daniel Vetter
                   ` (3 more replies)
  0 siblings, 4 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Petri Latvala @ 2019-06-05 12:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: igt-dev; +Cc: Petri Latvala

Signed-off-by: Petri Latvala <petri.latvala@intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
---
 runner/executor.c | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/runner/executor.c b/runner/executor.c
index 7e5fbe8f..69ef21e5 100644
--- a/runner/executor.c
+++ b/runner/executor.c
@@ -142,6 +142,7 @@ static const struct {
 	unsigned long bit;
 	const char *explanation;
 } abort_taints[] = {
+  {(1 << 4), "TAINT_MACHINE_CHECK: Processor reported a Machine Check Exception."},
   {(1 << 5), "TAINT_BAD_PAGE: Bad page reference or an unexpected page flags."},
   {(1 << 7), "TAINT_DIE: Kernel has died - BUG/OOPS."},
   {(1 << 9), "TAINT_WARN: WARN_ON has happened."},
-- 
2.19.1

_______________________________________________
igt-dev mailing list
igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* Re: [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] runner: Also consider TAINT_MACHINE_CHECK as abortable taint
  2019-06-05 12:16 [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] runner: Also consider TAINT_MACHINE_CHECK as abortable taint Petri Latvala
@ 2019-06-05 12:36 ` Daniel Vetter
  2019-06-05 12:47   ` Mika Kuoppala
  2019-06-05 12:53   ` Petri Latvala
  2019-06-05 12:40 ` Mika Kuoppala
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  3 siblings, 2 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Vetter @ 2019-06-05 12:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Petri Latvala; +Cc: igt-dev

On Wed, Jun 05, 2019 at 03:16:07PM +0300, Petri Latvala wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Petri Latvala <petri.latvala@intel.com>
> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>

I've seen lots of machines where these happen as normal side-effect of
thermal throtlling. For some value of "normal".

Do we really want to reboot on these? It could be like the network thing I
recently disabled, and then everyone started screaming because our
machines where constantly rebooting due to network cards/drivers
temporarily having a bad time (but usually recovering).
-Daniel
> ---
>  runner/executor.c | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/runner/executor.c b/runner/executor.c
> index 7e5fbe8f..69ef21e5 100644
> --- a/runner/executor.c
> +++ b/runner/executor.c
> @@ -142,6 +142,7 @@ static const struct {
>  	unsigned long bit;
>  	const char *explanation;
>  } abort_taints[] = {
> +  {(1 << 4), "TAINT_MACHINE_CHECK: Processor reported a Machine Check Exception."},
>    {(1 << 5), "TAINT_BAD_PAGE: Bad page reference or an unexpected page flags."},
>    {(1 << 7), "TAINT_DIE: Kernel has died - BUG/OOPS."},
>    {(1 << 9), "TAINT_WARN: WARN_ON has happened."},
> -- 
> 2.19.1
> 
> _______________________________________________
> igt-dev mailing list
> igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev

-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
igt-dev mailing list
igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* Re: [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] runner: Also consider TAINT_MACHINE_CHECK as abortable taint
  2019-06-05 12:16 [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] runner: Also consider TAINT_MACHINE_CHECK as abortable taint Petri Latvala
  2019-06-05 12:36 ` Daniel Vetter
@ 2019-06-05 12:40 ` Mika Kuoppala
  2019-06-05 13:02 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
  2019-06-06 19:21 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Mika Kuoppala @ 2019-06-05 12:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Petri Latvala, igt-dev; +Cc: Petri Latvala

Petri Latvala <petri.latvala@intel.com> writes:

> Signed-off-by: Petri Latvala <petri.latvala@intel.com>
> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>

If we get one, the machine should be removed from the pool.

Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>

> ---
>  runner/executor.c | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/runner/executor.c b/runner/executor.c
> index 7e5fbe8f..69ef21e5 100644
> --- a/runner/executor.c
> +++ b/runner/executor.c
> @@ -142,6 +142,7 @@ static const struct {
>  	unsigned long bit;
>  	const char *explanation;
>  } abort_taints[] = {
> +  {(1 << 4), "TAINT_MACHINE_CHECK: Processor reported a Machine Check Exception."},
>    {(1 << 5), "TAINT_BAD_PAGE: Bad page reference or an unexpected page flags."},
>    {(1 << 7), "TAINT_DIE: Kernel has died - BUG/OOPS."},
>    {(1 << 9), "TAINT_WARN: WARN_ON has happened."},
> -- 
> 2.19.1
_______________________________________________
igt-dev mailing list
igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* Re: [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] runner: Also consider TAINT_MACHINE_CHECK as abortable taint
  2019-06-05 12:36 ` Daniel Vetter
@ 2019-06-05 12:47   ` Mika Kuoppala
  2019-06-05 12:57     ` Petri Latvala
  2019-06-05 12:53   ` Petri Latvala
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Mika Kuoppala @ 2019-06-05 12:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Daniel Vetter, Petri Latvala; +Cc: igt-dev

Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch> writes:

> On Wed, Jun 05, 2019 at 03:16:07PM +0300, Petri Latvala wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Petri Latvala <petri.latvala@intel.com>
>> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
>
> I've seen lots of machines where these happen as normal side-effect of
> thermal throtlling. For some value of "normal".
>

Thermals could be ok and filtered if we can be somewhat certain that
the state didn't suffer. Can we?

> Do we really want to reboot on these? It could be like the network thing I
> recently disabled, and then everyone started screaming because our
> machines where constantly rebooting due to network cards/drivers
> temporarily having a bad time (but usually recovering).

Reboot? This won't get fixed by reboot as the hw is busted.

The question is that is it fruitful to weed out software
failures with a broken hardware.

-Mika

> -Daniel
>> ---
>>  runner/executor.c | 1 +
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>> 
>> diff --git a/runner/executor.c b/runner/executor.c
>> index 7e5fbe8f..69ef21e5 100644
>> --- a/runner/executor.c
>> +++ b/runner/executor.c
>> @@ -142,6 +142,7 @@ static const struct {
>>  	unsigned long bit;
>>  	const char *explanation;
>>  } abort_taints[] = {
>> +  {(1 << 4), "TAINT_MACHINE_CHECK: Processor reported a Machine Check Exception."},
>>    {(1 << 5), "TAINT_BAD_PAGE: Bad page reference or an unexpected page flags."},
>>    {(1 << 7), "TAINT_DIE: Kernel has died - BUG/OOPS."},
>>    {(1 << 9), "TAINT_WARN: WARN_ON has happened."},
>> -- 
>> 2.19.1
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> igt-dev mailing list
>> igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
>> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev
>
> -- 
> Daniel Vetter
> Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
> http://blog.ffwll.ch
> _______________________________________________
> igt-dev mailing list
> igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev
_______________________________________________
igt-dev mailing list
igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* Re: [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] runner: Also consider TAINT_MACHINE_CHECK as abortable taint
  2019-06-05 12:36 ` Daniel Vetter
  2019-06-05 12:47   ` Mika Kuoppala
@ 2019-06-05 12:53   ` Petri Latvala
  2019-06-05 16:54     ` Daniel Vetter
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Petri Latvala @ 2019-06-05 12:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Daniel Vetter; +Cc: igt-dev

On Wed, Jun 05, 2019 at 02:36:56PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 05, 2019 at 03:16:07PM +0300, Petri Latvala wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Petri Latvala <petri.latvala@intel.com>
> > Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
> 
> I've seen lots of machines where these happen as normal side-effect of
> thermal throtlling. For some value of "normal".
> 
> Do we really want to reboot on these? It could be like the network thing I
> recently disabled, and then everyone started screaming because our
> machines where constantly rebooting due to network cards/drivers
> temporarily having a bad time (but usually recovering).


I've seen some MCE log messages on dmesgs, quite often on one of the
BXTs for example. How often those MCE triggers caused taint is another
question.

Reading the mce code, it seems to be thermal _failure_ that causes a
taint. And all of these add_taint() calls also use
LOCKDEP_NOW_UNRELIABLE so we're already deep under the bus if we get
that taint.



-- 
Petri Latvala
_______________________________________________
igt-dev mailing list
igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* Re: [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] runner: Also consider TAINT_MACHINE_CHECK as abortable taint
  2019-06-05 12:47   ` Mika Kuoppala
@ 2019-06-05 12:57     ` Petri Latvala
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Petri Latvala @ 2019-06-05 12:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Mika Kuoppala; +Cc: igt-dev, Daniel Vetter

On Wed, Jun 05, 2019 at 03:47:57PM +0300, Mika Kuoppala wrote:
> Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch> writes:
> 
> > On Wed, Jun 05, 2019 at 03:16:07PM +0300, Petri Latvala wrote:
> >> Signed-off-by: Petri Latvala <petri.latvala@intel.com>
> >> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
> >
> > I've seen lots of machines where these happen as normal side-effect of
> > thermal throtlling. For some value of "normal".
> >
> 
> Thermals could be ok and filtered if we can be somewhat certain that
> the state didn't suffer. Can we?
> 
> > Do we really want to reboot on these? It could be like the network thing I
> > recently disabled, and then everyone started screaming because our
> > machines where constantly rebooting due to network cards/drivers
> > temporarily having a bad time (but usually recovering).
> 
> Reboot? This won't get fixed by reboot as the hw is busted.
> 
> The question is that is it fruitful to weed out software
> failures with a broken hardware.


Yeah, I forgot to mention this aspect.

We don't want to just reboot on this: We want to

1) never file a cibuglog filter on TAINT_MACHINE_CHECK. We want that to always be critical.
2) if we get that abort, replace the hw.

Whether that's possible depends on when/if we get that particular taint happening...


-- 
Petri Latvala
_______________________________________________
igt-dev mailing list
igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for runner: Also consider TAINT_MACHINE_CHECK as abortable taint
  2019-06-05 12:16 [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] runner: Also consider TAINT_MACHINE_CHECK as abortable taint Petri Latvala
  2019-06-05 12:36 ` Daniel Vetter
  2019-06-05 12:40 ` Mika Kuoppala
@ 2019-06-05 13:02 ` Patchwork
  2019-06-06 19:21 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2019-06-05 13:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Petri Latvala; +Cc: igt-dev

== Series Details ==

Series: runner: Also consider TAINT_MACHINE_CHECK as abortable taint
URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/61651/
State : success

== Summary ==

CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_6195 -> IGTPW_3116
====================================================

Summary
-------

  **SUCCESS**

  No regressions found.

  External URL: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/61651/revisions/1/mbox/

Known issues
------------

  Here are the changes found in IGTPW_3116 that come from known issues:

### IGT changes ###

#### Issues hit ####

  * igt@i915_module_load@reload:
    - fi-icl-u3:          [PASS][1] -> [DMESG-WARN][2] ([fdo#106107])
   [1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6195/fi-icl-u3/igt@i915_module_load@reload.html
   [2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_3116/fi-icl-u3/igt@i915_module_load@reload.html

  * igt@kms_cursor_legacy@basic-flip-after-cursor-legacy:
    - fi-icl-u3:          [PASS][3] -> [DMESG-WARN][4] ([fdo#107724]) +2 similar issues
   [3]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6195/fi-icl-u3/igt@kms_cursor_legacy@basic-flip-after-cursor-legacy.html
   [4]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_3116/fi-icl-u3/igt@kms_cursor_legacy@basic-flip-after-cursor-legacy.html

  
#### Possible fixes ####

  * igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@basic:
    - fi-hsw-peppy:       [DMESG-WARN][5] ([fdo#102614]) -> [PASS][6]
   [5]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6195/fi-hsw-peppy/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@basic.html
   [6]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_3116/fi-hsw-peppy/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@basic.html

  * igt@prime_vgem@basic-fence-flip:
    - fi-icl-u3:          [DMESG-WARN][7] ([fdo#107724]) -> [PASS][8] +1 similar issue
   [7]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6195/fi-icl-u3/igt@prime_vgem@basic-fence-flip.html
   [8]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_3116/fi-icl-u3/igt@prime_vgem@basic-fence-flip.html

  
  [fdo#102614]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102614
  [fdo#106107]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106107
  [fdo#107724]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107724


Participating hosts (52 -> 46)
------------------------------

  Additional (1): fi-apl-guc 
  Missing    (7): fi-ilk-m540 fi-hsw-4200u fi-byt-squawks fi-bsw-cyan fi-kbl-7560u fi-byt-clapper fi-bdw-samus 


Build changes
-------------

  * IGT: IGT_5039 -> IGTPW_3116

  CI_DRM_6195: 06b71939f2477c76f9eecb1dd5e99dcb25cb8371 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
  IGTPW_3116: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_3116/
  IGT_5039: 2d4f470bba1cb51ed116fb80b170f717c6294714 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/xorg/app/intel-gpu-tools

== Logs ==

For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_3116/
_______________________________________________
igt-dev mailing list
igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* Re: [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] runner: Also consider TAINT_MACHINE_CHECK as abortable taint
  2019-06-05 12:53   ` Petri Latvala
@ 2019-06-05 16:54     ` Daniel Vetter
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Vetter @ 2019-06-05 16:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Daniel Vetter, igt-dev

On Wed, Jun 05, 2019 at 03:53:54PM +0300, Petri Latvala wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 05, 2019 at 02:36:56PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 05, 2019 at 03:16:07PM +0300, Petri Latvala wrote:
> > > Signed-off-by: Petri Latvala <petri.latvala@intel.com>
> > > Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
> > 
> > I've seen lots of machines where these happen as normal side-effect of
> > thermal throtlling. For some value of "normal".
> > 
> > Do we really want to reboot on these? It could be like the network thing I
> > recently disabled, and then everyone started screaming because our
> > machines where constantly rebooting due to network cards/drivers
> > temporarily having a bad time (but usually recovering).
> 
> 
> I've seen some MCE log messages on dmesgs, quite often on one of the
> BXTs for example. How often those MCE triggers caused taint is another
> question.
> 
> Reading the mce code, it seems to be thermal _failure_ that causes a
> taint. And all of these add_taint() calls also use
> LOCKDEP_NOW_UNRELIABLE so we're already deep under the bus if we get
> that taint.

Hm ok if lockdep is gone then we reboot anyway. I guess ack from me then.

Since the goal is to throw these machines out, shouldn't we have a special
error for these? Instead of just aborted I mean.
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
igt-dev mailing list
igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for runner: Also consider TAINT_MACHINE_CHECK as abortable taint
  2019-06-05 12:16 [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] runner: Also consider TAINT_MACHINE_CHECK as abortable taint Petri Latvala
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2019-06-05 13:02 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
@ 2019-06-06 19:21 ` Patchwork
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2019-06-06 19:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Petri Latvala; +Cc: igt-dev

== Series Details ==

Series: runner: Also consider TAINT_MACHINE_CHECK as abortable taint
URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/61651/
State : success

== Summary ==

CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_6195_full -> IGTPW_3116_full
====================================================

Summary
-------

  **SUCCESS**

  No regressions found.

  External URL: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/61651/revisions/1/mbox/

Possible new issues
-------------------

  Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in IGTPW_3116_full:

### IGT changes ###

#### Suppressed ####

  The following results come from untrusted machines, tests, or statuses.
  They do not affect the overall result.

  * {igt@gem_ctx_shared@exec-shared-gtt-render}:
    - shard-apl:          NOTRUN -> [FAIL][1]
   [1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_3116/shard-apl6/igt@gem_ctx_shared@exec-shared-gtt-render.html

  * {igt@gem_exec_balancer@smoke}:
    - shard-iclb:         [PASS][2] -> [SKIP][3]
   [2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6195/shard-iclb1/igt@gem_exec_balancer@smoke.html
   [3]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_3116/shard-iclb3/igt@gem_exec_balancer@smoke.html

  
Known issues
------------

  Here are the changes found in IGTPW_3116_full that come from known issues:

### IGT changes ###

#### Issues hit ####

  * igt@gem_eio@reset-stress:
    - shard-snb:          [PASS][4] -> [FAIL][5] ([fdo#109661])
   [4]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6195/shard-snb1/igt@gem_eio@reset-stress.html
   [5]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_3116/shard-snb6/igt@gem_eio@reset-stress.html

  * igt@gem_mmap_gtt@forked-medium-copy-odd:
    - shard-iclb:         [PASS][6] -> [INCOMPLETE][7] ([fdo#107713])
   [6]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6195/shard-iclb8/igt@gem_mmap_gtt@forked-medium-copy-odd.html
   [7]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_3116/shard-iclb8/igt@gem_mmap_gtt@forked-medium-copy-odd.html

  * igt@gem_softpin@noreloc-s3:
    - shard-apl:          [PASS][8] -> [DMESG-WARN][9] ([fdo#108566]) +3 similar issues
   [8]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6195/shard-apl8/igt@gem_softpin@noreloc-s3.html
   [9]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_3116/shard-apl5/igt@gem_softpin@noreloc-s3.html

  * igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbc-2p-scndscrn-cur-indfb-draw-blt:
    - shard-hsw:          [PASS][10] -> [SKIP][11] ([fdo#109271]) +7 similar issues
   [10]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6195/shard-hsw2/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbc-2p-scndscrn-cur-indfb-draw-blt.html
   [11]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_3116/shard-hsw1/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbc-2p-scndscrn-cur-indfb-draw-blt.html

  * igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbc-badstride:
    - shard-iclb:         [PASS][12] -> [FAIL][13] ([fdo#103167]) +4 similar issues
   [12]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6195/shard-iclb8/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbc-badstride.html
   [13]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_3116/shard-iclb7/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbc-badstride.html

  * igt@kms_setmode@basic:
    - shard-kbl:          [PASS][14] -> [FAIL][15] ([fdo#99912])
   [14]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6195/shard-kbl3/igt@kms_setmode@basic.html
   [15]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_3116/shard-kbl1/igt@kms_setmode@basic.html

  * igt@kms_sysfs_edid_timing:
    - shard-hsw:          [PASS][16] -> [FAIL][17] ([fdo#100047])
   [16]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6195/shard-hsw4/igt@kms_sysfs_edid_timing.html
   [17]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_3116/shard-hsw1/igt@kms_sysfs_edid_timing.html

  
#### Possible fixes ####

  * {igt@gem_exec_balancer@bonded-imm}:
    - shard-iclb:         [FAIL][18] -> [PASS][19]
   [18]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6195/shard-iclb4/igt@gem_exec_balancer@bonded-imm.html
   [19]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_3116/shard-iclb3/igt@gem_exec_balancer@bonded-imm.html

  * igt@gem_tiled_swapping@non-threaded:
    - shard-apl:          [DMESG-WARN][20] ([fdo#108686]) -> [PASS][21]
   [20]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6195/shard-apl2/igt@gem_tiled_swapping@non-threaded.html
   [21]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_3116/shard-apl5/igt@gem_tiled_swapping@non-threaded.html

  * igt@gem_workarounds@suspend-resume-context:
    - shard-apl:          [DMESG-WARN][22] ([fdo#108566]) -> [PASS][23] +4 similar issues
   [22]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6195/shard-apl6/igt@gem_workarounds@suspend-resume-context.html
   [23]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_3116/shard-apl8/igt@gem_workarounds@suspend-resume-context.html

  * igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-suspend:
    - shard-kbl:          [INCOMPLETE][24] ([fdo#103665]) -> [PASS][25]
   [24]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6195/shard-kbl6/igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-suspend.html
   [25]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_3116/shard-kbl1/igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-suspend.html

  * igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbc-1p-primscrn-pri-indfb-draw-render:
    - shard-iclb:         [FAIL][26] ([fdo#103167]) -> [PASS][27] +1 similar issue
   [26]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6195/shard-iclb7/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbc-1p-primscrn-pri-indfb-draw-render.html
   [27]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_3116/shard-iclb3/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbc-1p-primscrn-pri-indfb-draw-render.html

  * igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbc-1p-rte:
    - shard-iclb:         [FAIL][28] ([fdo#103167] / [fdo#110378]) -> [PASS][29]
   [28]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6195/shard-iclb7/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbc-1p-rte.html
   [29]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_3116/shard-iclb5/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbc-1p-rte.html

  * igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbc-2p-scndscrn-cur-indfb-draw-pwrite:
    - shard-hsw:          [SKIP][30] ([fdo#109271]) -> [PASS][31] +16 similar issues
   [30]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6195/shard-hsw1/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbc-2p-scndscrn-cur-indfb-draw-pwrite.html
   [31]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_3116/shard-hsw2/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbc-2p-scndscrn-cur-indfb-draw-pwrite.html

  * igt@kms_psr2_su@page_flip:
    - shard-iclb:         [SKIP][32] ([fdo#109642]) -> [PASS][33]
   [32]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6195/shard-iclb1/igt@kms_psr2_su@page_flip.html
   [33]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_3116/shard-iclb2/igt@kms_psr2_su@page_flip.html

  * igt@kms_psr@psr2_cursor_plane_move:
    - shard-iclb:         [SKIP][34] ([fdo#109441]) -> [PASS][35]
   [34]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6195/shard-iclb1/igt@kms_psr@psr2_cursor_plane_move.html
   [35]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_3116/shard-iclb2/igt@kms_psr@psr2_cursor_plane_move.html

  * igt@kms_setmode@basic:
    - shard-apl:          [FAIL][36] ([fdo#99912]) -> [PASS][37]
   [36]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6195/shard-apl8/igt@kms_setmode@basic.html
   [37]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_3116/shard-apl4/igt@kms_setmode@basic.html

  
  {name}: This element is suppressed. This means it is ignored when computing
          the status of the difference (SUCCESS, WARNING, or FAILURE).

  [fdo#100047]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100047
  [fdo#103167]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103167
  [fdo#103665]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103665
  [fdo#107713]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107713
  [fdo#108566]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108566
  [fdo#108686]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108686
  [fdo#109271]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109271
  [fdo#109441]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109441
  [fdo#109642]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109642
  [fdo#109661]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109661
  [fdo#110378]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110378
  [fdo#99912]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99912


Participating hosts (10 -> 6)
------------------------------

  Missing    (4): pig-skl-6260u shard-skl pig-hsw-4770r pig-glk-j5005 


Build changes
-------------

  * IGT: IGT_5039 -> IGTPW_3116
  * Piglit: piglit_4509 -> None

  CI_DRM_6195: 06b71939f2477c76f9eecb1dd5e99dcb25cb8371 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
  IGTPW_3116: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_3116/
  IGT_5039: 2d4f470bba1cb51ed116fb80b170f717c6294714 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/xorg/app/intel-gpu-tools
  piglit_4509: fdc5a4ca11124ab8413c7988896eec4c97336694 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/piglit

== Logs ==

For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_3116/
_______________________________________________
igt-dev mailing list
igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2019-06-06 19:21 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-06-05 12:16 [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] runner: Also consider TAINT_MACHINE_CHECK as abortable taint Petri Latvala
2019-06-05 12:36 ` Daniel Vetter
2019-06-05 12:47   ` Mika Kuoppala
2019-06-05 12:57     ` Petri Latvala
2019-06-05 12:53   ` Petri Latvala
2019-06-05 16:54     ` Daniel Vetter
2019-06-05 12:40 ` Mika Kuoppala
2019-06-05 13:02 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2019-06-06 19:21 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox