From: "Dixit, Ashutosh" <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
To: Umesh Nerlige Ramappa <umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com>
Cc: igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org,
Lionel G Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [igt-dev] [PATCH 4/5] tools/i915-perf: Add mmapped OA buffer support to i915-perf-recorder
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2021 18:05:05 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87a6l71wla.wl-ashutosh.dixit@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210803200737.30843-4-umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com>
On Tue, 03 Aug 2021 13:07:36 -0700, Umesh Nerlige Ramappa wrote:
>
> Currently report from OA buffer are read from the perf_fd. The kernel
> patches enable mmaping the OA buffer into user space to allow for faster
> report queries across different platforms and engines.
>
> Enable OA buffer to be mmaped by the recorder tool based on command line
> option -M.
Not completely reviewed yet but some changes are needed, please see below.
> +static int gem_set_domain(int fd, uint32_t handle, uint32_t read, uint32_t write)
> +{
> + struct drm_i915_gem_set_domain set_domain = {
> + .handle = handle,
> + .read_domains = read,
> + .write_domain = write,
> + };
> + int ret = 0;
> +
> + if (perf_ioctl(fd, DRM_IOCTL_I915_GEM_SET_DOMAIN, &set_domain))
set_domain is not available for discrete, see IGT gem_set_domain().
> +static void *gem_mmap_cpu(int fd, uint32_t handle, uint64_t offset, uint64_t size,
> + unsigned int prot)
> +{
> + struct drm_i915_gem_mmap arg = {
> + .handle = handle,
> + .offset = offset,
> + .size = size,
> + .addr_ptr = 0,
> + .flags = 0,
> + };
> +
> + if (perf_ioctl(fd, DRM_IOCTL_I915_GEM_MMAP, &arg))
This needs to be changed to mmap_offset, DRM_IOCTL_I915_GEM_MMAP has been
discontinued for future products.
> +static void
> +bb_emit_srm(struct bb_context *bb, uint32_t reg, uint32_t devid)
> +{
> + bool gen8_plus = devid >= 8;
> +
> + assert(bb->reloc_idx < ARRAY_SIZE(bb->reloc));
> + assert(bb->offset < BATCH_SIZE);
> +
> + bb->batch[bb->offset++] = gen8_plus ? MI_STORE_REGISTER_MEM_GEN8 :
> + MI_STORE_REGISTER_MEM;
> + bb->batch[bb->offset++] = reg;
> +
> + bb->reloc[bb->reloc_idx].target_handle = bb->obj[0].handle;
> + bb->reloc[bb->reloc_idx].presumed_offset = bb->obj[0].offset;
> + bb->reloc[bb->reloc_idx].offset = bb->offset * sizeof(uint32_t);
> + bb->reloc[bb->reloc_idx].delta = bb->reloc_idx * sizeof(uint32_t);
> + bb->reloc[bb->reloc_idx].read_domains = I915_GEM_DOMAIN_RENDER;
> + bb->reloc[bb->reloc_idx].write_domain = I915_GEM_DOMAIN_RENDER;
> +
> + bb->batch[bb->offset++] = bb->reloc[bb->reloc_idx].delta;
> + if (gen8_plus)
> + bb->batch[bb->offset++] = 0;
Relocations are also not available for future products. Let's use softpin,
it is simple to do and several examples for this are already merged.
> @@ -1015,16 +1450,40 @@ main(int argc, char *argv[])
> corr_period_ns = corr_period * 1000000000ul;
> poll_time_ns = corr_period_ns;
>
> + if (mmap_buffer) {
> + ctx.zero_fd = open("/dev/zero", O_RDWR | O_CLOEXEC);
Don't we need /dev/null rather than /dev/zero? Anyway looks unnecessarily
complicated, just malloc a buffer and read repeatedly into it?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-24 1:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-03 20:07 [igt-dev] [PATCH 1/5] i915/perf: add tests for triggered OA reports Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2021-08-03 20:07 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH 2/5] i915/perf: Add tests for mapped OA buffer Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2021-08-23 21:31 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2021-08-24 18:58 ` Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2021-08-24 19:18 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2021-08-03 20:07 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH 3/5] lib/i915/perf: Add new record for mmaped " Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2021-08-03 20:07 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH 4/5] tools/i915-perf: Add mmapped OA buffer support to i915-perf-recorder Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2021-08-24 1:05 ` Dixit, Ashutosh [this message]
2021-08-24 19:14 ` Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2021-08-24 1:45 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2021-08-26 23:57 ` Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2021-08-24 3:50 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2021-08-24 18:50 ` Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2021-08-24 19:40 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2021-08-24 20:03 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2021-08-03 20:07 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH 5/5] tools/i915-perf: Add a command to trigger a report in OA buffer Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2021-08-03 20:39 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [1/5] i915/perf: add tests for triggered OA reports Patchwork
2021-08-03 23:21 ` [igt-dev] ✗ GitLab.Pipeline: warning " Patchwork
2021-08-04 20:13 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success " Patchwork
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-08-30 19:33 [igt-dev] [PATCH 1/5] " Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2021-08-30 19:33 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH 4/5] tools/i915-perf: Add mmapped OA buffer support to i915-perf-recorder Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87a6l71wla.wl-ashutosh.dixit@intel.com \
--to=ashutosh.dixit@intel.com \
--cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com \
--cc=umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox