From: "Dixit, Ashutosh" <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
To: Umesh Nerlige Ramappa <umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com>
Cc: igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org,
Lionel G Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [igt-dev] [PATCH 2/5] i915/perf: Add tests for mapped OA buffer
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2021 14:31:38 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87czq326h1.wl-ashutosh.dixit@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210803200737.30843-2-umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com>
On Tue, 03 Aug 2021 13:07:34 -0700, Umesh Nerlige Ramappa wrote:
>
> For applications that need a faster way to access reports in the OA
> buffer, i915 now provides a way to map the OA buffer to privileged user
> space. Validate the mapped OA buffer.
>
> v2: Fail on forked-privileged access to mapped oa buffer (Chris)
A few nits/questions below otherwise this is:
Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
> diff --git a/include/drm-uapi/i915_drm.h b/include/drm-uapi/i915_drm.h
> index a1c0030c..bb7d5e73 100644
> --- a/include/drm-uapi/i915_drm.h
> +++ b/include/drm-uapi/i915_drm.h
> @@ -2151,6 +2151,39 @@ struct drm_i915_perf_open_param {
> */
> #define I915_PERF_IOCTL_CONFIG _IO('i', 0x2)
>
> +/*
> + * Returns OA buffer properties to be used with mmap.
> + *
> + * This ioctl is available in perf revision 8.
> + */
> +#define I915_PERF_IOCTL_GET_OA_BUFFER_INFO _IOWR('i', 0x3, struct drm_i915_perf_oa_buffer_info)
> +
> +/**
> + * OA buffer size and offset.
> + *
> + * OA output buffer
> + * type: 0
> + * flags: mbz
> + *
> + * After querying the info, pass (size,offset) to mmap(),
> + *
> + * mmap(0, info.size, PROT_READ, MAP_PRIVATE, perf_fd, info.offset).
> + *
> + * Note that only a private (not shared between processes, or across fork())
> + * read-only mmapping is allowed.
> + *
> + * Userspace must treat the incoming data as tainted, but it conforms to the OA
What does tainted mean?
> diff --git a/tests/i915/perf.c b/tests/i915/perf.c
> index fa3840eb..4d4808ce 100644
> --- a/tests/i915/perf.c
> +++ b/tests/i915/perf.c
> @@ -5156,6 +5156,266 @@ static void test_oa_regs_whitelist(int paranoid)
> intel_register_access_fini(&mmio_data);
> }
>
> +#define OA_BUFFER_DATA(tail, head, oa_buffer_size) \
> + (((tail) - (head)) & ((oa_buffer_size) - 1))
> +
> +#ifndef MAP_FAILED
> +#define MAP_FAILED ((void *)-1)
> +#endif
Shouldn't need this, should just '#include <sys/mman.h>'.
> +static uint32_t oa_status_reg(void)
> +{
> + uint32_t status;
> +
> + intel_register_access_init(&mmio_data, intel_get_pci_device(),
> + 0, drm_fd);
> + if (IS_HASWELL(devid))
> + status = intel_register_read(&mmio_data, 0x2346) & 0x7;
> + else if (IS_GEN12(devid))
> + status = intel_register_read(&mmio_data, 0xdafc) & 0x7;
> + else
> + status = intel_register_read(&mmio_data, 0x2b08) & 0xf;
OK, looks like these can be read directly after they are whitelisted by the
kernel.
> +static void try_invalid_access(void *vaddr)
> +{
> + sighandler_t old_sigsegv;
> + uint32_t dummy;
> +
> + old_sigsegv = signal(SIGSEGV, sigtrap);
> + switch (sigsetjmp(jmp, SIGSEGV)) {
> + case SIGSEGV:
> + break;
> + case 0:
> + dummy = READ_ONCE(*((uint32_t *)vaddr + 1));
I would just read vaddr, not (vaddr + 1).
> +static void *map_oa_buffer(uint32_t *size)
> +{
> + struct drm_i915_perf_oa_buffer_info oa_buffer = { 0 };
> + void *vaddr;
> +
> + do_ioctl(stream_fd, I915_PERF_IOCTL_GET_OA_BUFFER_INFO, &oa_buffer);
> +
> + igt_debug("size = %llu\n", oa_buffer.size);
> + igt_debug("offset = %llx\n", oa_buffer.offset);
> +
> + igt_assert_eq(oa_buffer.size & (oa_buffer.size - 1), 0);
> + igt_assert_eq(oa_status_reg(), 0);
> +
> + vaddr = mmap(0, oa_buffer.size, PROT_READ, MAP_PRIVATE, stream_fd, oa_buffer.offset);
> + igt_assert(vaddr != NULL);
Should probably be:
igt_assert(vaddr != MAP_FAILED && vaddr != NULL);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-23 21:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-03 20:07 [igt-dev] [PATCH 1/5] i915/perf: add tests for triggered OA reports Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2021-08-03 20:07 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH 2/5] i915/perf: Add tests for mapped OA buffer Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2021-08-23 21:31 ` Dixit, Ashutosh [this message]
2021-08-24 18:58 ` Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2021-08-24 19:18 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2021-08-03 20:07 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH 3/5] lib/i915/perf: Add new record for mmaped " Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2021-08-03 20:07 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH 4/5] tools/i915-perf: Add mmapped OA buffer support to i915-perf-recorder Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2021-08-24 1:05 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2021-08-24 19:14 ` Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2021-08-24 1:45 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2021-08-26 23:57 ` Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2021-08-24 3:50 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2021-08-24 18:50 ` Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2021-08-24 19:40 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2021-08-24 20:03 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2021-08-03 20:07 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH 5/5] tools/i915-perf: Add a command to trigger a report in OA buffer Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2021-08-03 20:39 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [1/5] i915/perf: add tests for triggered OA reports Patchwork
2021-08-03 23:21 ` [igt-dev] ✗ GitLab.Pipeline: warning " Patchwork
2021-08-04 20:13 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success " Patchwork
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-08-30 19:33 [igt-dev] [PATCH 1/5] " Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2021-08-30 19:33 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH 2/5] i915/perf: Add tests for mapped OA buffer Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87czq326h1.wl-ashutosh.dixit@intel.com \
--to=ashutosh.dixit@intel.com \
--cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com \
--cc=umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox