From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
To: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>,
igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH i-g-t 10/20] tools/intel_vbt_decode: Reuse print_detail_timing_data()
Date: Fri, 31 May 2024 17:50:54 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87h6eedohd.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240531142354.16528-11-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
On Fri, 31 May 2024, Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
>
> We currently have two copies of code to decode the basic EDID
> defined DTD. Get rid of the ad-hoc variant in dump_lfp_data()
> and just reuse print_detail_timing_data() for it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> tools/intel_vbt_decode.c | 106 ++++++++++++++-------------------------
> 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 67 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/intel_vbt_decode.c b/tools/intel_vbt_decode.c
> index 2a11490eed22..ed18a156c1ee 100644
> --- a/tools/intel_vbt_decode.c
> +++ b/tools/intel_vbt_decode.c
> @@ -53,17 +53,6 @@ typedef uint64_t u64;
> #define _INTEL_BIOS_PRIVATE
> #include "intel_vbt_defs.h"
>
> -/* no bother to include "edid.h" */
> -#define _H_ACTIVE(x) (x[2] + ((x[4] & 0xF0) << 4))
> -#define _H_SYNC_OFF(x) (x[8] + ((x[11] & 0xC0) << 2))
> -#define _H_SYNC_WIDTH(x) (x[9] + ((x[11] & 0x30) << 4))
> -#define _H_BLANK(x) (x[3] + ((x[4] & 0x0F) << 8))
> -#define _V_ACTIVE(x) (x[5] + ((x[7] & 0xF0) << 4))
> -#define _V_SYNC_OFF(x) ((x[10] >> 4) + ((x[11] & 0x0C) << 2))
> -#define _V_SYNC_WIDTH(x) ((x[10] & 0x0F) + ((x[11] & 0x03) << 4))
> -#define _V_BLANK(x) (x[6] + ((x[7] & 0x0F) << 8))
> -#define _PIXEL_CLOCK(x) (x[0] + (x[1] << 8)) * 10000
> -
> #define YESNO(val) ((val) ? "yes" : "no")
>
> /* This is not for mapping to memory layout. */
> @@ -1382,6 +1371,38 @@ static void dump_lfp_data_ptrs(struct context *context,
> }
> }
>
> +static void
> +print_detail_timing_data(const struct bdb_edid_dtd *dvo_timing)
Here too params for "heading" line and indent/prefix might be
appropriate. Again, can be improved in follow-up.
> +{
> + int display, sync_start, sync_end, total;
> +
> + display = (dvo_timing->hactive_hi << 8) | dvo_timing->hactive_lo;
> + sync_start = display +
> + ((dvo_timing->hsync_off_hi << 8) | dvo_timing->hsync_off_lo);
> + sync_end = sync_start + ((dvo_timing->hsync_pulse_width_hi << 8) |
> + dvo_timing->hsync_pulse_width_lo);
> + total = display +
> + ((dvo_timing->hblank_hi << 8) | dvo_timing->hblank_lo);
> + printf("\t\t hdisplay: %d\n", display);
> + printf("\t\t hsync [%d, %d] %s\n", sync_start, sync_end,
> + dvo_timing->hsync_positive ? "+sync" : "-sync");
> + printf("\t\t htotal: %d\n", total);
> +
> + display = (dvo_timing->vactive_hi << 8) | dvo_timing->vactive_lo;
> + sync_start = display + ((dvo_timing->vsync_off_hi << 8) |
> + dvo_timing->vsync_off_lo);
> + sync_end = sync_start + ((dvo_timing->vsync_pulse_width_hi << 8) |
> + dvo_timing->vsync_pulse_width_lo);
> + total = display +
> + ((dvo_timing->vblank_hi << 8) | dvo_timing->vblank_lo);
> + printf("\t\t vdisplay: %d\n", display);
> + printf("\t\t vsync [%d, %d] %s\n", sync_start, sync_end,
> + dvo_timing->vsync_positive ? "+sync" : "-sync");
> + printf("\t\t vtotal: %d\n", total);
> +
> + printf("\t\t clock: %d\n", dvo_timing->clock * 10);
> +}
> +
> static char *decode_pnp_id(u16 mfg_name, char str[4])
> {
> mfg_name = ntohs(mfg_name);
> @@ -1412,9 +1433,6 @@ static void dump_lfp_data(struct context *context,
> struct bdb_block *ptrs_block;
> const struct bdb_lfp_data_ptrs *ptrs;
> int i;
> - int hdisplay, hsyncstart, hsyncend, htotal;
> - int vdisplay, vsyncstart, vsyncend, vtotal;
> - float clock;
>
> ptrs_block = find_section(context, BDB_LFP_DATA_PTRS);
> if (!ptrs_block)
> @@ -1425,7 +1443,7 @@ static void dump_lfp_data(struct context *context,
> for (i = 0; i < 16; i++) {
> const struct fp_timing *fp_timing =
> block_data(block) + ptrs->ptr[i].fp_timing.offset;
> - const uint8_t *timing_data =
> + const struct bdb_edid_dtd *dvo_timing =
> block_data(block) + ptrs->ptr[i].dvo_timing.offset;
> const struct bdb_edid_pnp_id *pnp_id =
> block_data(block) + ptrs->ptr[i].panel_pnp_id.offset;
> @@ -1435,22 +1453,10 @@ static void dump_lfp_data(struct context *context,
> if (!dump_panel(context, i))
> continue;
>
> - hdisplay = _H_ACTIVE(timing_data);
> - hsyncstart = hdisplay + _H_SYNC_OFF(timing_data);
> - hsyncend = hsyncstart + _H_SYNC_WIDTH(timing_data);
> - htotal = hdisplay + _H_BLANK(timing_data);
> -
> - vdisplay = _V_ACTIVE(timing_data);
> - vsyncstart = vdisplay + _V_SYNC_OFF(timing_data);
> - vsyncend = vsyncstart + _V_SYNC_WIDTH(timing_data);
> - vtotal = vdisplay + _V_BLANK(timing_data);
> - clock = _PIXEL_CLOCK(timing_data) / 1000;
> -
> printf("\tPanel %d%s\n", i, panel_str(context, i));
> - printf("\t\t%dx%d clock %d\n",
> - fp_timing->x_res, fp_timing->y_res,
> - _PIXEL_CLOCK(timing_data));
> - printf("\t\tinfo:\n");
> + printf("\t\tResolution: %dx%d\n",
> + fp_timing->x_res, fp_timing->y_res);
> + printf("\t\tFP timing data:\n");
> printf("\t\t LVDS: 0x%08lx\n",
> (unsigned long)fp_timing->lvds_reg_val);
> printf("\t\t PP_ON_DELAYS: 0x%08lx\n",
> @@ -1461,11 +1467,9 @@ static void dump_lfp_data(struct context *context,
> (unsigned long)fp_timing->pp_cycle_reg_val);
> printf("\t\t PFIT: 0x%08lx\n",
> (unsigned long)fp_timing->pfit_reg_val);
> - printf("\t\ttimings: %d %d %d %d %d %d %d %d %.2f (%s)\n",
> - hdisplay, hsyncstart, hsyncend, htotal,
> - vdisplay, vsyncstart, vsyncend, vtotal, clock,
> - (hsyncend > htotal || vsyncend > vtotal) ?
> - "BAD!" : "good");
> +
> + printf("\t\tDVO timing:\n");
> + print_detail_timing_data(dvo_timing);
>
> printf("\t\tPnP ID:\n");
> dump_pnp_id(pnp_id);
> @@ -1926,38 +1930,6 @@ static void dump_lfp_power(struct context *context,
> }
> }
>
> -static void
> -print_detail_timing_data(const struct bdb_edid_dtd *dvo_timing)
> -{
> - int display, sync_start, sync_end, total;
> -
> - display = (dvo_timing->hactive_hi << 8) | dvo_timing->hactive_lo;
> - sync_start = display +
> - ((dvo_timing->hsync_off_hi << 8) | dvo_timing->hsync_off_lo);
> - sync_end = sync_start + ((dvo_timing->hsync_pulse_width_hi << 8) |
> - dvo_timing->hsync_pulse_width_lo);
> - total = display +
> - ((dvo_timing->hblank_hi << 8) | dvo_timing->hblank_lo);
> - printf("\thdisplay: %d\n", display);
> - printf("\thsync [%d, %d] %s\n", sync_start, sync_end,
> - dvo_timing->hsync_positive ? "+sync" : "-sync");
> - printf("\thtotal: %d\n", total);
> -
> - display = (dvo_timing->vactive_hi << 8) | dvo_timing->vactive_lo;
> - sync_start = display + ((dvo_timing->vsync_off_hi << 8) |
> - dvo_timing->vsync_off_lo);
> - sync_end = sync_start + ((dvo_timing->vsync_pulse_width_hi << 8) |
> - dvo_timing->vsync_pulse_width_lo);
> - total = display +
> - ((dvo_timing->vblank_hi << 8) | dvo_timing->vblank_lo);
> - printf("\tvdisplay: %d\n", display);
> - printf("\tvsync [%d, %d] %s\n", sync_start, sync_end,
> - dvo_timing->vsync_positive ? "+sync" : "-sync");
> - printf("\tvtotal: %d\n", total);
> -
> - printf("\tclock: %d\n", dvo_timing->clock * 10);
> -}
> -
> static void dump_sdvo_lvds_dtd(struct context *context,
> const struct bdb_block *block)
> {
--
Jani Nikula, Intel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-31 14:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-31 14:23 [PATCH i-g-t 00/20] tools/intel_vbt_decode: Refactoring and prep work for decoding more blocks Ville Syrjala
2024-05-31 14:23 ` [PATCH i-g-t 01/20] tools/intel_vbt_decode: Finish the s/lvds/lfp/ rename Ville Syrjala
2024-05-31 14:23 ` [PATCH i-g-t 02/20] tools/intel_vbt_decode: s/dump_sdvo_panel_dtd()/dump_sdvo_lvds_dtd()/ Ville Syrjala
2024-05-31 14:23 ` [PATCH i-g-t 03/20] lib: Define DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST() Ville Syrjala
2024-05-31 14:23 ` [PATCH i-g-t 04/20] tools/intel_vbt_decode: Fix some tabs Ville Syrjala
2024-05-31 14:23 ` [PATCH i-g-t 05/20] tools/intel_vbt_decode: Add missing newline Ville Syrjala
2024-05-31 14:23 ` [PATCH i-g-t 06/20] tools/intel_vbt_decode: Indent ALS dump Ville Syrjala
2024-05-31 14:23 ` [PATCH i-g-t 07/20] tools/intel_vbt_decode: Use "(LFP<n>)" to indicate LFP panel type Ville Syrjala
2024-05-31 14:23 ` [PATCH i-g-t 08/20] tools/intel_vbt_decode: Decode the "not HDMI" bit right way up Ville Syrjala
2024-05-31 14:23 ` [PATCH i-g-t 09/20] tools/intel_vbt_decode: Extract dump_pnp_id() Ville Syrjala
2024-05-31 14:48 ` Jani Nikula
2024-06-05 11:41 ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-05-31 14:23 ` [PATCH i-g-t 10/20] tools/intel_vbt_decode: Reuse print_detail_timing_data() Ville Syrjala
2024-05-31 14:50 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2024-05-31 14:23 ` [PATCH i-g-t 11/20] tools/intel_vbt_decode: Dump the new eDP DSC disable bit Ville Syrjala
2024-05-31 14:23 ` [PATCH i-g-t 12/20] tools/intel_vbt_decode: Allow dumpers to delcate min version for the block Ville Syrjala
2024-05-31 14:23 ` [PATCH i-g-t 13/20] tools/intel_vbt_decode: Use .min_bdb_version to filter out PSR block on pre-165 VBTs Ville Syrjala
2024-05-31 14:23 ` [PATCH i-g-t 14/20] tools/intel_vbt_decode: Sort dumper table Ville Syrjala
2024-05-31 14:23 ` [PATCH i-g-t 15/20] tools/intel_vbt_decode: Use struct bdb_sdvo_lvds_dtd Ville Syrjala
2024-05-31 14:23 ` [PATCH i-g-t 16/20] tools/intel_vbt_decode: Track the SDVO panel type Ville Syrjala
2024-05-31 14:23 ` [PATCH i-g-t 17/20] tools/intel_vbt_decode: Use find_raw_section() to determine block presence Ville Syrjala
2024-05-31 14:23 ` [PATCH i-g-t 18/20] tools/intel_vbt_decode: Make device handle names more compact Ville Syrjala
2024-05-31 14:23 ` [PATCH i-g-t 19/20] tools/intel_vbt_decode: Declare min/max version for child dev handles Ville Syrjala
2024-05-31 14:23 ` [PATCH i-g-t 20/20] tools/intel_vbt_decode: Decode device handle as a bitmask Ville Syrjala
2024-05-31 15:10 ` Jani Nikula
2024-05-31 15:11 ` [PATCH i-g-t 00/20] tools/intel_vbt_decode: Refactoring and prep work for decoding more blocks Jani Nikula
2024-05-31 16:53 ` ✗ GitLab.Pipeline: warning for " Patchwork
2024-05-31 17:19 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2024-05-31 17:24 ` ✓ CI.xeBAT: success " Patchwork
2024-05-31 19:02 ` ✗ CI.xeFULL: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87h6eedohd.fsf@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@intel.com \
--cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox