From: "Sharma, Swati2" <swati2.sharma@intel.com>
To: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: <igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH i-g-t] tests/kms_flip: Add flip-vs-dpms-on-nop subtest
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2025 13:06:57 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <90d979f3-f49d-411c-87be-9bacf5a252be@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8ba86f20-f486-478e-804c-2127e3b40081@intel.com>
Hi Ville,
Thanks for the re-run.
Test as expected seems to be passing
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_12907/shards-all.html?testfilter=flip-vs-dpms-on-nop
Patch LGTM
Reviewed-by: Swati Sharma <swati2.sharma@intel.com>
On 02-04-2025 03:56 pm, Sharma, Swati2 wrote:
> Hi Ville,
>
> On 01-04-2025 09:54 pm, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 01, 2025 at 01:44:16PM +0530, Sharma, Swati2 wrote:
>>> Hi Ville,
>>>
>>> Since this test is failing across all platforms.
>>> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGTPW_12687/shards-all.html?testfilter=lip-vs-dpms-on-nop
>>>
>>> If this is expected beh, do we need to modify IGT to handle this
>>> negative scenario.
>> It won't fail anymore since the kernel fix is in already.
> Do you want to add this test? Can you re-run to know whether its fixed?
>>
>>> On 01-03-2025 01:12 am, Ville Syrjala wrote:
>>>> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
>>>>
>>>> Verify that redundant DPMS ON requests don't result in
>>>> actual commits (and thus frame drops). This behaviour
>>>> is guaranteed by the kernel for atomic drivers.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> tests/kms_flip.c | 5 ++++-
>>>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/tests/kms_flip.c b/tests/kms_flip.c
>>>> index 3ad4d0afb1f6..59740aca25bd 100755
>>>> --- a/tests/kms_flip.c
>>>> +++ b/tests/kms_flip.c
>>>> @@ -176,6 +176,7 @@
>>>> * @single-buffer-flip-vs-dpms-off-vs-modeset: pageflip of same
>>>> buffer along with
>>>> * the modeset and
>>>> dpms off
>>>> * @dpms-vs-vblank-race: vblank along with
>>>> the dpms & modeset
>>>> + * @flip-vs-dpms-on-nop: pageflip and issue
>>>> nop DPMS ON
>>>> */
>>>> /**
>>>> @@ -240,6 +241,7 @@
>>>> */
>>>> #define TEST_DPMS (1 << 0)
>>>> +#define TEST_DPMS_ON_NOP (1 << 1)
>>>> #define TEST_PAN (1 << 3)
>>>> #define TEST_MODESET (1 << 4)
>>>> @@ -957,7 +959,7 @@ static bool run_test_step(struct test_output
>>>> *o, unsigned int *events)
>>>> if (o->flags & TEST_MODESET)
>>>> igt_assert(set_mode(o, o->fb_ids[o->current_fb_id], 0,
>>>> 0) == 0);
>>>> - if (o->flags & TEST_DPMS)
>>>> + if (o->flags & (TEST_DPMS | TEST_DPMS_ON_NOP))
>>>> set_dpms(o, DRM_MODE_DPMS_ON);
>>>> if (o->flags & TEST_VBLANK_RACE) {
>>>> @@ -2020,6 +2022,7 @@ igt_main_args("e", NULL, help_str,
>>>> opt_handler, NULL)
>>>> "plain-flip-fb-recreate" },
>>>> { 30, TEST_FLIP | TEST_RMFB | TEST_MODESET ,
>>>> "flip-vs-rmfb" },
>>>> { 2, TEST_FLIP | TEST_DPMS | TEST_EINVAL | TEST_BASIC,
>>>> "flip-vs-dpms" },
>>>> + { 2, TEST_FLIP | TEST_DPMS_ON_NOP | TEST_CHECK_TS,
>>>> "flip-vs-dpms-on-nop" },
>>>> { 30, TEST_FLIP | TEST_PAN, "flip-vs-panning" },
>>>> { 2, TEST_FLIP | TEST_MODESET | TEST_EINVAL |
>>>> TEST_BASIC, "flip-vs-modeset" },
>>>> { 30, TEST_FLIP | TEST_VBLANK_EXPIRED_SEQ,
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-07 7:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-28 19:42 [PATCH i-g-t] tests/kms_flip: Add flip-vs-dpms-on-nop subtest Ville Syrjala
2025-03-01 0:14 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2025-03-01 0:29 ` ✓ i915.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-03-01 9:42 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
2025-03-01 13:45 ` ✗ i915.CI.Full: " Patchwork
2025-04-01 8:14 ` [PATCH i-g-t] " Sharma, Swati2
2025-04-01 16:24 ` Ville Syrjälä
2025-04-02 10:26 ` Sharma, Swati2
2025-04-07 7:36 ` Sharma, Swati2 [this message]
2025-04-01 18:52 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: success for tests/kms_flip: Add flip-vs-dpms-on-nop subtest (rev2) Patchwork
2025-04-01 19:08 ` ✓ i915.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-04-01 22:06 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
2025-04-01 22:19 ` ✗ i915.CI.Full: " Patchwork
2025-04-02 19:50 ` ✓ i915.CI.BAT: success for tests/kms_flip: Add flip-vs-dpms-on-nop subtest (rev3) Patchwork
2025-04-02 20:02 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-04-02 21:58 ` ✗ i915.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
2025-04-02 22:29 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: " Patchwork
2025-04-06 23:20 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure for tests/kms_flip: Add flip-vs-dpms-on-nop subtest (rev2) Patchwork
2025-04-07 0:36 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure for tests/kms_flip: Add flip-vs-dpms-on-nop subtest (rev3) Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=90d979f3-f49d-411c-87be-9bacf5a252be@intel.com \
--to=swati2.sharma@intel.com \
--cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox