Igt-dev Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: "Sharma, Swati2" <swati2.sharma@intel.com>
Cc: igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH i-g-t] tests/kms_flip: Add flip-vs-dpms-on-nop subtest
Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2025 19:24:43 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z-wTSwYb5mg1R1Qp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <79f7f21b-cbc4-46c4-ab61-c214a6169f95@intel.com>

On Tue, Apr 01, 2025 at 01:44:16PM +0530, Sharma, Swati2 wrote:
> Hi Ville,
> 
> Since this test is failing across all platforms.
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGTPW_12687/shards-all.html?testfilter=lip-vs-dpms-on-nop
> If this is expected beh, do we need to modify IGT to handle this 
> negative scenario.

It won't fail anymore since the kernel fix is in already.

> 
> On 01-03-2025 01:12 am, Ville Syrjala wrote:
> > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> >
> > Verify that redundant DPMS ON requests don't result in
> > actual commits (and thus frame drops). This behaviour
> > is guaranteed by the kernel for atomic drivers.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> >   tests/kms_flip.c | 5 ++++-
> >   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tests/kms_flip.c b/tests/kms_flip.c
> > index 3ad4d0afb1f6..59740aca25bd 100755
> > --- a/tests/kms_flip.c
> > +++ b/tests/kms_flip.c
> > @@ -176,6 +176,7 @@
> >    * @single-buffer-flip-vs-dpms-off-vs-modeset: pageflip of same buffer along with
> >    *                                             the modeset and dpms off
> >    * @dpms-vs-vblank-race:                       vblank along with the dpms & modeset
> > + * @flip-vs-dpms-on-nop:                       pageflip and issue nop DPMS ON
> >    */
> >   
> >   /**
> > @@ -240,6 +241,7 @@
> >    */
> >   
> >   #define TEST_DPMS		(1 << 0)
> > +#define TEST_DPMS_ON_NOP	(1 << 1)
> >   
> >   #define TEST_PAN		(1 << 3)
> >   #define TEST_MODESET		(1 << 4)
> > @@ -957,7 +959,7 @@ static bool run_test_step(struct test_output *o, unsigned int *events)
> >   	if (o->flags & TEST_MODESET)
> >   		igt_assert(set_mode(o, o->fb_ids[o->current_fb_id], 0, 0) == 0);
> >   
> > -	if (o->flags & TEST_DPMS)
> > +	if (o->flags & (TEST_DPMS | TEST_DPMS_ON_NOP))
> >   		set_dpms(o, DRM_MODE_DPMS_ON);
> >   
> >   	if (o->flags & TEST_VBLANK_RACE) {
> > @@ -2020,6 +2022,7 @@ igt_main_args("e", NULL, help_str, opt_handler, NULL)
> >   			"plain-flip-fb-recreate" },
> >   		{ 30, TEST_FLIP | TEST_RMFB | TEST_MODESET , "flip-vs-rmfb" },
> >   		{ 2, TEST_FLIP | TEST_DPMS | TEST_EINVAL | TEST_BASIC, "flip-vs-dpms" },
> > +		{ 2, TEST_FLIP | TEST_DPMS_ON_NOP | TEST_CHECK_TS, "flip-vs-dpms-on-nop" },
> >   		{ 30,  TEST_FLIP | TEST_PAN, "flip-vs-panning" },
> >   		{ 2, TEST_FLIP | TEST_MODESET | TEST_EINVAL | TEST_BASIC, "flip-vs-modeset" },
> >   		{ 30,  TEST_FLIP | TEST_VBLANK_EXPIRED_SEQ,

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel

  reply	other threads:[~2025-04-01 16:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-02-28 19:42 [PATCH i-g-t] tests/kms_flip: Add flip-vs-dpms-on-nop subtest Ville Syrjala
2025-03-01  0:14 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2025-03-01  0:29 ` ✓ i915.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-03-01  9:42 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
2025-03-01 13:45 ` ✗ i915.CI.Full: " Patchwork
2025-04-01  8:14 ` [PATCH i-g-t] " Sharma, Swati2
2025-04-01 16:24   ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2025-04-02 10:26     ` Sharma, Swati2
2025-04-07  7:36       ` Sharma, Swati2
2025-04-01 18:52 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: success for tests/kms_flip: Add flip-vs-dpms-on-nop subtest (rev2) Patchwork
2025-04-01 19:08 ` ✓ i915.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-04-01 22:06 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
2025-04-01 22:19 ` ✗ i915.CI.Full: " Patchwork
2025-04-02 19:50 ` ✓ i915.CI.BAT: success for tests/kms_flip: Add flip-vs-dpms-on-nop subtest (rev3) Patchwork
2025-04-02 20:02 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-04-02 21:58 ` ✗ i915.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
2025-04-02 22:29 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: " Patchwork
2025-04-06 23:20 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure for tests/kms_flip: Add flip-vs-dpms-on-nop subtest (rev2) Patchwork
2025-04-07  0:36 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure for tests/kms_flip: Add flip-vs-dpms-on-nop subtest (rev3) Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Z-wTSwYb5mg1R1Qp@intel.com \
    --to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=swati2.sharma@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox