From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
To: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>,
IGT dev <igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: Andi Shyti <andi@etezian.org>
Subject: Re: [igt-dev] [PATCH v16 8/8] test: perf_pmu: use the gem_engine_topology library
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2019 12:40:55 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c8f81939-7a2d-833f-f637-4aa37ae7e5d9@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190328192206.1591-9-andi.shyti@intel.com>
On 28/03/2019 19:22, Andi Shyti wrote:
> Replace the legacy for_each_engine* defines with the ones
> implemented in the gem_engine_topology library.
>
> Use whenever possible gem_engine_can_store_dword() that checks
> class instead of flags.
>
> Now the __for_each_engine_class_instance and
> for_each_engine_class_instance are unused, remove them.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>
> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> lib/igt_gt.h | 7 -------
> tests/perf_pmu.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> 2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/igt_gt.h b/lib/igt_gt.h
> index f3f07e895733..cd6d7e4f8967 100644
> --- a/lib/igt_gt.h
> +++ b/lib/igt_gt.h
> @@ -118,11 +118,4 @@ void gem_require_engine(int gem_fd,
> igt_require(gem_has_engine(gem_fd, class, instance));
> }
>
> -#define __for_each_engine_class_instance(e__) \
> - for ((e__) = intel_execution_engines2; (e__)->name; (e__)++)
> -
> -#define for_each_engine_class_instance(fd__, e__) \
> - for ((e__) = intel_execution_engines2; (e__)->name; (e__)++) \
> - for_if (gem_has_engine((fd__), (e__)->class, (e__)->instance))
> -
> #endif /* IGT_GT_H */
> diff --git a/tests/perf_pmu.c b/tests/perf_pmu.c
> index 4f552bc2ae28..1487688781ab 100644
> --- a/tests/perf_pmu.c
> +++ b/tests/perf_pmu.c
> @@ -170,14 +170,14 @@ static unsigned int e2ring(int gem_fd, const struct intel_execution_engine2 *e)
> #define FLAG_LONG (16)
> #define FLAG_HANG (32)
>
> -static igt_spin_t * __spin_poll(int fd, uint32_t ctx, unsigned long flags)
> +static igt_spin_t * __spin_poll(int fd, uint32_t ctx, const struct intel_execution_engine2 *e)
> {
> struct igt_spin_factory opts = {
> .ctx = ctx,
> - .engine = flags,
> + .engine = e->flags,
> };
>
> - if (gem_can_store_dword(fd, flags))
> + if (gem_engine_can_store_dword(fd, e))
> opts.flags |= IGT_SPIN_POLL_RUN;
>
> return __igt_spin_batch_factory(fd, &opts);
> @@ -211,7 +211,16 @@ static unsigned long __spin_wait(int fd, igt_spin_t *spin)
>
> static igt_spin_t * __spin_sync(int fd, uint32_t ctx, unsigned long flags)
__spin_sync should also take engine instead of flags, like __spin_poll.
> {
> - igt_spin_t *spin = __spin_poll(fd, ctx, flags);
> + struct igt_spin_factory opts = {
> + .ctx = ctx,
> + .engine = flags,
> + };
> + igt_spin_t *spin;
> +
> + if (gem_can_store_dword(fd, flags))
> + opts.flags |= IGT_SPIN_POLL_RUN;
> +
> + spin = __igt_spin_batch_factory(fd, &opts);
And then you don't need this hunk at all, making the whole thing
completely ready for more engines.
And e2ring will end up with no callers so can be removed.
>
> __spin_wait(fd, spin);
>
> @@ -434,8 +443,8 @@ busy_check_all(int gem_fd, const struct intel_execution_engine2 *e,
>
> i = 0;
> fd[0] = -1;
> - for_each_engine_class_instance(gem_fd, e_) {
> - if (e == e_)
> + __for_each_physical_engine(gem_fd, e_) {
> + if (e->class == e_->class && e->instance == e_->instance)
> busy_idx = i;
>
> fd[i++] = open_group(I915_PMU_ENGINE_BUSY(e_->class,
> @@ -497,13 +506,13 @@ most_busy_check_all(int gem_fd, const struct intel_execution_engine2 *e,
> unsigned int idle_idx, i;
>
> i = 0;
> - for_each_engine_class_instance(gem_fd, e_) {
> - if (e == e_)
> + __for_each_physical_engine(gem_fd, e_) {
> + if (e->class == e_->class && e->instance == e_->instance)
> idle_idx = i;
> else if (spin)
> __submit_spin_batch(gem_fd, spin, e_, 64);
> else
> - spin = __spin_poll(gem_fd, 0, e2ring(gem_fd, e_));
> + spin = __spin_poll(gem_fd, 0, e);
>
> val[i++] = I915_PMU_ENGINE_BUSY(e_->class, e_->instance);
> }
> @@ -554,11 +563,11 @@ all_busy_check_all(int gem_fd, const unsigned int num_engines,
> unsigned int i;
>
> i = 0;
> - for_each_engine_class_instance(gem_fd, e) {
> + __for_each_physical_engine(gem_fd, e) {
> if (spin)
> __submit_spin_batch(gem_fd, spin, e, 64);
> else
> - spin = __spin_poll(gem_fd, 0, e2ring(gem_fd, e));
> + spin = __spin_poll(gem_fd, 0, e);
>
> val[i++] = I915_PMU_ENGINE_BUSY(e->class, e->instance);
> }
> @@ -1683,7 +1692,7 @@ igt_main
> igt_require_gem(fd);
> igt_require(i915_type_id() > 0);
>
> - for_each_engine_class_instance(fd, e)
> + __for_each_physical_engine(fd, e)
> num_engines++;
> }
>
> @@ -1693,7 +1702,7 @@ igt_main
> igt_subtest("invalid-init")
> invalid_init();
>
> - __for_each_engine_class_instance(e) {
> + __for_each_static_engine(e) {
> const unsigned int pct[] = { 2, 50, 98 };
>
> /**
> @@ -1897,7 +1906,7 @@ igt_main
> gem_quiescent_gpu(fd);
> }
>
> - __for_each_engine_class_instance(e) {
> + __for_each_static_engine(e) {
> igt_subtest_group {
> igt_fixture {
> gem_require_engine(render_fd,
>
Yep, modulo __spin_sync change, this is what I had in mind.
Regards,
Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
igt-dev mailing list
igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-29 12:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-28 19:21 [igt-dev] [RFC v16 0/8] new engine discovery interface Andi Shyti
2019-03-28 19:21 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH v16 1/8] lib/igt_gt: remove unnecessary argument Andi Shyti
2019-03-29 11:34 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-03-28 19:22 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH v16 2/8] lib: ioctl_wrappers: reach engines by index as well Andi Shyti
2019-03-29 11:36 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-03-29 11:59 ` Andi Shyti
2019-03-28 19:22 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH v16 3/8] include/drm-uapi: import i915_drm.h header file Andi Shyti
2019-03-28 19:22 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH v16 4/8] lib/i915: add gem_engine_topology library and for_each loop definition Andi Shyti
2019-03-29 11:34 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-03-29 12:05 ` Andi Shyti
2019-03-28 19:22 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH v16 5/8] tests: gem_exec_basic: add engine discovery test Andi Shyti
2019-03-29 11:39 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-03-29 12:06 ` Andi Shyti
2019-03-29 12:41 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-03-29 23:36 ` Chris Wilson
2019-03-31 17:36 ` Andi Shyti
2019-03-31 17:42 ` Chris Wilson
2019-03-31 20:19 ` Andi Shyti
2019-03-28 19:22 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH v16 6/8] lib: igt_gt: make gem_engine_can_store_dword() check engine class Andi Shyti
2019-03-29 12:22 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-03-29 12:43 ` Andi Shyti
2019-03-28 19:22 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH v16 7/8] lib: igt_dummyload: use for_each_context_engine() Andi Shyti
2019-03-29 12:33 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-03-28 19:22 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH v16 8/8] test: perf_pmu: use the gem_engine_topology library Andi Shyti
2019-03-29 12:40 ` Tvrtko Ursulin [this message]
2019-03-29 12:47 ` Andi Shyti
2019-03-29 12:56 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-03-28 20:15 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for new engine discovery interface Patchwork
2019-03-29 7:40 ` [igt-dev] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c8f81939-7a2d-833f-f637-4aa37ae7e5d9@linux.intel.com \
--to=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=andi.shyti@intel.com \
--cc=andi@etezian.org \
--cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox