Re: ✗ CI.xeFULL: failure for tests/intel/xe_vm:Reduce n_execs for bind-array-enobufs

["Randhawa, Jagmeet" <jagmeet.randhawa@intel.com>]

On 10/28/2024 9:55 AM, Kamil Konieczny wrote:
> Hi igt-dev,
> On 2024-10-23 at 04:37:55 -0000, Patchwork wrote:
>> == Series Details ==
>>
>> Series: tests/intel/xe_vm:Reduce n_execs for bind-array-enobufs
>> URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/140336/
>> State : failure
>>
>> == Summary ==
>>
>> CI Bug Log - changes from XEIGT_8082_full -> XEIGTPW_11960_full
>> ====================================================
>>
>> Summary
>> -------
>>
>>    **FAILURE**
>>
>>    Serious unknown changes coming with XEIGTPW_11960_full absolutely need to be
>>    verified manually.
>>    
>>    If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
>>    introduced in XEIGTPW_11960_full, please notify your bug team (I915-ci-infra@lists.freedesktop.org) to allow them
>>    to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.
>>
>>    
>>
>> Participating hosts (4 -> 4)
>> ------------------------------
>>
>>    No changes in participating hosts
>>
>> Possible new issues
>> -------------------
>>
>>    Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in XEIGTPW_11960_full:
>>
>> ### IGT changes ###
>>
>> #### Possible regressions ####
>>
>>    * igt@kms_flip@dpms-vs-vblank-race-interruptible@a-edp1:
>>      - shard-lnl:          [PASS][1] -> [FAIL][2] +2 other tests fail
>>     [1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGT_8082/shard-lnl-4/igt@kms_flip@dpms-vs-vblank-race-interruptible@a-edp1.html
>>     [2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGTPW_11960/shard-lnl-2/igt@kms_flip@dpms-vs-vblank-race-interruptible@a-edp1.html
>>
>>    * igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@psr-1p-primscrn-cur-indfb-onoff:
>>      - shard-lnl:          [PASS][3] -> [DMESG-WARN][4]
>>     [3]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGT_8082/shard-lnl-2/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@psr-1p-primscrn-cur-indfb-onoff.html
>>     [4]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGTPW_11960/shard-lnl-4/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@psr-1p-primscrn-cur-indfb-onoff.html
>>
>>    * igt@xe_vm@bind-array-enobufs:
>>      - shard-dg2-set2:     [PASS][5] -> [FAIL][6]
>>     [5]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGT_8082/shard-dg2-436/igt@xe_vm@bind-array-enobufs.html
>>     [6]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGTPW_11960/shard-dg2-463/igt@xe_vm@bind-array-enobufs.html
> Jagmeet, please look into this, was it caused by your patch?
>
> Rest of failures are unrelated,
>
> Regards,
> Kamil

Hey Kamil, I looked into this, and tested my patch  on DG2, this was not 
caused by my patch. It is unrelated.

Thanks,

Jagmeet

>>    * igt@xe_vm@bind-array-exec_queue-many:
>>      - shard-dg2-set2:     [PASS][7] -> [DMESG-WARN][8] +1 other test dmesg-warn
>>     [7]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGT_8082/shard-dg2-435/igt@xe_vm@bind-array-exec_queue-many.html
>>     [8]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGTPW_11960/shard-dg2-466/igt@xe_vm@bind-array-exec_queue-many.html
>>
>>    
>> Known issues
>> ------------
>>
>>    Here are the changes found in XEIGTPW_11960_full that come from known issues:
>>
> ...cut...
>
>>    [Intel XE#944]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/xe/kernel/issues/944
>>    [Intel XE#958]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/xe/kernel/issues/958
>>    [i915#2575]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/i915/kernel/-/issues/2575
>>    [i915#5274]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/i915/kernel/-/issues/5274
>>
>>
>> Build changes
>> -------------
>>
>>    * IGT: IGT_8082 -> IGTPW_11960
>>
>>    IGTPW_11960: d44f495790106e3e64d4540a30faa09c9fc4d1ca @ https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/igt-gpu-tools.git
>>    IGT_8082: c8379ec8b26f3c21bae5473706b23da78bd26ffa @ https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/igt-gpu-tools.git
>>    xe-2107-beaeaccd284ba3b69b6dbfdc18bb89441fc99a52: beaeaccd284ba3b69b6dbfdc18bb89441fc99a52
>>
>> == Logs ==
>>
>> For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGTPW_11960/index.html