* [PATCH v5 1/2] iio: adc: vf610_adc: use devm_* and dev_err_probe() to simple code
@ 2024-11-26 19:52 Frank Li
2024-11-26 19:52 ` [PATCH v5 2/2] iio: adc: vf610_adc: limit i.MX6SX's channel number to 4 Frank Li
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Frank Li @ 2024-11-26 19:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: jic23; +Cc: Frank.Li, haibo.chen, imx, lars, linux-iio, linux-kernel
Use devm_* and dev_err_probe() simplify probe function and remove
vf610_adc_remove().
Reviewed-by: Haibo Chen <haibo.chen@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com>
---
Change from v4 to v5
- Remove vref check in remove action callback
Change from v3 to v4
- keep vref_uv as u32
- keep original regulator part and only add
devm_add_action_or_reset(&pdev->dev, vf610_adc_remove, info)
Change from v2 to v3
- change vref_uv to int from u32 to fix below warning
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202411070633.NIrO7Ert-lkp@intel.com/
smatch warnings:
drivers/iio/adc/vf610_adc.c:857 vf610_adc_probe() warn: unsigned 'info->vref_uv' is never less than zero.
vim +857 drivers/iio/adc/vf610_adc.c
Change from v1 to v2
- add Haibo's review tag
---
drivers/iio/adc/vf610_adc.c | 78 ++++++++++++-------------------------
1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/vf610_adc.c b/drivers/iio/adc/vf610_adc.c
index 4d83c12975c53..fb7afa91151f2 100644
--- a/drivers/iio/adc/vf610_adc.c
+++ b/drivers/iio/adc/vf610_adc.c
@@ -814,6 +814,13 @@ static const struct of_device_id vf610_adc_match[] = {
};
MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, vf610_adc_match);
+static void vf610_adc_action_remove(void *d)
+{
+ struct vf610_adc *info = d;
+
+ regulator_disable(info->vref);
+}
+
static int vf610_adc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
@@ -823,10 +830,8 @@ static int vf610_adc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
int ret;
indio_dev = devm_iio_device_alloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(struct vf610_adc));
- if (!indio_dev) {
- dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed allocating iio device\n");
- return -ENOMEM;
- }
+ if (!indio_dev)
+ return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, -ENOMEM, "Failed allocating iio device\n");
info = iio_priv(indio_dev);
info->dev = &pdev->dev;
@@ -842,17 +847,12 @@ static int vf610_adc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
ret = devm_request_irq(info->dev, irq,
vf610_adc_isr, 0,
dev_name(&pdev->dev), indio_dev);
- if (ret < 0) {
- dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed requesting irq, irq = %d\n", irq);
- return ret;
- }
+ if (ret < 0)
+ return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, ret, "failed requesting irq, irq = %d\n", irq);
- info->clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "adc");
- if (IS_ERR(info->clk)) {
- dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed getting clock, err = %ld\n",
- PTR_ERR(info->clk));
- return PTR_ERR(info->clk);
- }
+ info->clk = devm_clk_get_enabled(&pdev->dev, "adc");
+ if (IS_ERR(info->clk))
+ return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, PTR_ERR(info->clk), "failed getting clock\n");
info->vref = devm_regulator_get(&pdev->dev, "vref");
if (IS_ERR(info->vref))
@@ -862,6 +862,10 @@ static int vf610_adc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
if (ret)
return ret;
+ ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(&pdev->dev, vf610_adc_action_remove, info);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
info->vref_uv = regulator_get_voltage(info->vref);
device_property_read_u32_array(dev, "fsl,adck-max-frequency", info->max_adck_rate, 3);
@@ -879,52 +883,21 @@ static int vf610_adc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
indio_dev->channels = vf610_adc_iio_channels;
indio_dev->num_channels = ARRAY_SIZE(vf610_adc_iio_channels);
- ret = clk_prepare_enable(info->clk);
- if (ret) {
- dev_err(&pdev->dev,
- "Could not prepare or enable the clock.\n");
- goto error_adc_clk_enable;
- }
-
vf610_adc_cfg_init(info);
vf610_adc_hw_init(info);
- ret = iio_triggered_buffer_setup(indio_dev, &iio_pollfunc_store_time,
- NULL, &iio_triggered_buffer_setup_ops);
- if (ret < 0) {
- dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Couldn't initialise the buffer\n");
- goto error_iio_device_register;
- }
+ ret = devm_iio_triggered_buffer_setup(&pdev->dev, indio_dev, &iio_pollfunc_store_time,
+ NULL, &iio_triggered_buffer_setup_ops);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, ret, "Couldn't initialise the buffer\n");
mutex_init(&info->lock);
- ret = iio_device_register(indio_dev);
- if (ret) {
- dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Couldn't register the device.\n");
- goto error_adc_buffer_init;
- }
+ ret = devm_iio_device_register(&pdev->dev, indio_dev);
+ if (ret)
+ return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, ret, "Couldn't register the device.\n");
return 0;
-
-error_adc_buffer_init:
- iio_triggered_buffer_cleanup(indio_dev);
-error_iio_device_register:
- clk_disable_unprepare(info->clk);
-error_adc_clk_enable:
- regulator_disable(info->vref);
-
- return ret;
-}
-
-static void vf610_adc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
-{
- struct iio_dev *indio_dev = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
- struct vf610_adc *info = iio_priv(indio_dev);
-
- iio_device_unregister(indio_dev);
- iio_triggered_buffer_cleanup(indio_dev);
- regulator_disable(info->vref);
- clk_disable_unprepare(info->clk);
}
static int vf610_adc_suspend(struct device *dev)
@@ -972,7 +945,6 @@ static DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(vf610_adc_pm_ops, vf610_adc_suspend,
static struct platform_driver vf610_adc_driver = {
.probe = vf610_adc_probe,
- .remove = vf610_adc_remove,
.driver = {
.name = DRIVER_NAME,
.of_match_table = vf610_adc_match,
--
2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v5 2/2] iio: adc: vf610_adc: limit i.MX6SX's channel number to 4
2024-11-26 19:52 [PATCH v5 1/2] iio: adc: vf610_adc: use devm_* and dev_err_probe() to simple code Frank Li
@ 2024-11-26 19:52 ` Frank Li
2024-11-26 19:56 ` Fabio Estevam
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Frank Li @ 2024-11-26 19:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: jic23; +Cc: Frank.Li, haibo.chen, imx, lars, linux-iio, linux-kernel
i.MX6SX only has 4 ADC channels, so limit channel numbers to 4 for
compatible string 'fsl,imx6sx-adc'.
Reviewed-by: Haibo Chen <haibo.chen@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com>
---
compatible string 'fsl,imx6sx-adc' already document in
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/fsl,vf610-adc.yaml
Change from v4 to v5
- none
Change from v3 to v4
- Add struct vf610_chip_info to avoid cast int to void*
Change from v2 to v3
- none
Change from v1 to v2
- Add Haibo Chen <haibo.chen@nxp.com>
- change cast to uintptr_t to fix below warning
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202411052345.gyJaM3h4-lkp@intel.com/
All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
In file included from drivers/iio/adc/vf610_adc.c:20: In file included from include/linux/regulator/consumer.h:35:
In file included from include/linux/suspend.h:5:
In file included from include/linux/swap.h:9:
In file included from include/linux/memcontrol.h:21:
In file included from include/linux/mm.h:2213:
include/linux/vmstat.h:518:36: warning: arithmetic between different enumeration types ('enum node_stat_item' and 'enum lru_list') [-Wenum-enum-conversion]
518 | return node_stat_name(NR_LRU_BASE + lru) + 3; // skip "nr_"
| ~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~>> drivers/iio/adc/vf610_adc.c:874:28: warning: cast to smaller integer type 'u32' (aka 'unsigned int') from 'const void *' [-Wvoid-pointer-to-int-cast]
874 | indio_dev->num_channels = (u32)device_get_match_data(dev);
|
---
drivers/iio/adc/vf610_adc.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/vf610_adc.c b/drivers/iio/adc/vf610_adc.c
index fb7afa91151f2..ed05c2b3caeca 100644
--- a/drivers/iio/adc/vf610_adc.c
+++ b/drivers/iio/adc/vf610_adc.c
@@ -177,6 +177,10 @@ struct vf610_adc {
} scan;
};
+struct vf610_chip_info {
+ u8 num_channels;
+};
+
static const u32 vf610_hw_avgs[] = { 1, 4, 8, 16, 32 };
static const u32 vf610_lst_adder[] = { 3, 5, 7, 9, 13, 17, 21, 25 };
@@ -808,8 +812,17 @@ static const struct iio_info vf610_adc_iio_info = {
.attrs = &vf610_attribute_group,
};
+static const struct vf610_chip_info vf610_chip_info = {
+ .num_channels = ARRAY_SIZE(vf610_adc_iio_channels),
+};
+
+static const struct vf610_chip_info imx6sx_chip_info = {
+ .num_channels = 4,
+};
+
static const struct of_device_id vf610_adc_match[] = {
- { .compatible = "fsl,vf610-adc", },
+ { .compatible = "fsl,imx6sx-adc", .data = &imx6sx_chip_info},
+ { .compatible = "fsl,vf610-adc", .data = &vf610_chip_info},
{ /* sentinel */ }
};
MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, vf610_adc_match);
@@ -823,6 +836,7 @@ static void vf610_adc_action_remove(void *d)
static int vf610_adc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
+ const struct vf610_chip_info *chip_info;
struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
struct vf610_adc *info;
struct iio_dev *indio_dev;
@@ -840,6 +854,10 @@ static int vf610_adc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
if (IS_ERR(info->regs))
return PTR_ERR(info->regs);
+ chip_info = device_get_match_data(dev);
+ if (!chip_info)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
if (irq < 0)
return irq;
@@ -881,7 +899,7 @@ static int vf610_adc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
indio_dev->info = &vf610_adc_iio_info;
indio_dev->modes = INDIO_DIRECT_MODE;
indio_dev->channels = vf610_adc_iio_channels;
- indio_dev->num_channels = ARRAY_SIZE(vf610_adc_iio_channels);
+ indio_dev->num_channels = chip_info->num_channels;
vf610_adc_cfg_init(info);
vf610_adc_hw_init(info);
--
2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] iio: adc: vf610_adc: limit i.MX6SX's channel number to 4
2024-11-26 19:52 ` [PATCH v5 2/2] iio: adc: vf610_adc: limit i.MX6SX's channel number to 4 Frank Li
@ 2024-11-26 19:56 ` Fabio Estevam
2024-11-30 20:21 ` Jonathan Cameron
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Fabio Estevam @ 2024-11-26 19:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Frank Li; +Cc: jic23, haibo.chen, imx, lars, linux-iio, linux-kernel
On Tue, Nov 26, 2024 at 4:53 PM Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com> wrote:
> + chip_info = device_get_match_data(dev);
> + if (!chip_info)
This NULL check is not needed.
If the code entered probe(), a compatible was matched.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] iio: adc: vf610_adc: limit i.MX6SX's channel number to 4
2024-11-26 19:56 ` Fabio Estevam
@ 2024-11-30 20:21 ` Jonathan Cameron
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jonathan Cameron @ 2024-11-30 20:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Fabio Estevam; +Cc: Frank Li, haibo.chen, imx, lars, linux-iio, linux-kernel
On Tue, 26 Nov 2024 16:56:23 -0300
Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 26, 2024 at 4:53 PM Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com> wrote:
>
> > + chip_info = device_get_match_data(dev);
> > + if (!chip_info)
>
> This NULL check is not needed.
>
> If the code entered probe(), a compatible was matched.
Whilst I don't feel strongly either way on this check, I've dropped it
and applied the patches to the testing branch of iio.git.
Thanks,
Jonathan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-11-30 20:22 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-11-26 19:52 [PATCH v5 1/2] iio: adc: vf610_adc: use devm_* and dev_err_probe() to simple code Frank Li
2024-11-26 19:52 ` [PATCH v5 2/2] iio: adc: vf610_adc: limit i.MX6SX's channel number to 4 Frank Li
2024-11-26 19:56 ` Fabio Estevam
2024-11-30 20:21 ` Jonathan Cameron
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox