From: Mahesh Jagannath Salgaonkar <mahesh-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
To: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Harald Hoyer <harald-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
Initramfs Dracut
<initramfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
Ananth Narayan <ananth-xthvdsQ13ZrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
Steven F Best <sbest-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
Haren Myneni <hbabu-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
holzheu-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: Firmware assisted dump support in dracut
Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2013 14:04:05 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51B0497D.5060708@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130605155316.GI16339-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
On 06/05/2013 09:23 PM, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 10:55:04AM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote:
>
> [..]
>>>> If first kernel and kdump kernel command line are same in fadump and
>>>> boot environment is same, I think it is worth exploring the option
>>>> of saving kdump from kdump service when system boots back. That will
>>>> do away with any need to tweak initramfs.
>>>
>>> This needs larger memory to be reserved. We may need to make sure that
>>> kdump service is invoked at very early stage before other services kicks
>>> in which may start requesting for memory and run into OOM issue. If we
>>> can make sure that no other services are invoked when kdump service is
>>> saving dump then it will help to fix the size of reserved memory. The
>>> systemd infrastructure provides aggressive parallelization capabilities.
>>> I am not expert on systemd but will need to explore whether with systemd
>>> is this possible.
>>
>> I think we can create a new service for saving dump and make some of
>> the systemd services dependent on start of this service.
>>
>> Can't integrate with existing kdump service as that one can start
>> later and can take time in regenerating initramfs and holding back other
>> services for that duration will not make sense.
>>
>> By creating a seprate service, delay will be introduced only when there
>> s dump to be saved. Before this we will have bring up all networking
>> and storage in the system so that we can save dump to intended target.
>>
>> I think same service can be used to save dump from inside initramfs
>> too. (As systemd is now started inside initramfs too).
>>
>> Other appraoch is dumping through initramfs and if you do things
>> conditionally (if dump is available), then any dracut parameter
>> used by kdump will have to have a conditional version too. Something
>> like
>>
>> mount=
>> mount.kdump_only=
Agree. The kdump_only options can be used to store the kdump related
required configs (e.g. lvm configs, network configs etc.) in a separate
directory and add a pre-udev hook that can check if dump is available
and move these configs to their original paths so that the normal
initramfs flow will do its job as per configs.
>>
>> mount.kdump_only will kick in only dump is available. Also we need to
>> make sure that effects of all kdump_only options are undone before
>> root is mounted or we create nice handover mechanism to systemd. I think
Agree.
>> there handover mechanism already between initramfs and systemd for complex
>> storage targets like multipathd.
>>
>> I will let harald comment on what does he think of kdump_only variant
>> options.
>
> Thinking more about it, I think from kdump point of view, it is better
> to be able to dump from initrafs. We don't want different mechanism
> for different architecture which will result in more confusion and
> possibly code duplication.
>
Agree. And if we rely on dracut to rebuild the initramfs (with original
dracut arguments) we can be sure that we wont run into issues like
unbootable system.
Thanks,
-Mahesh.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-06 8:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-28 16:12 Firmware assisted dump support in dracut Mahesh J Salgaonkar
[not found] ` <20121128161234.GA8991-xthvdsQ13ZrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2012-11-29 10:14 ` Harald Hoyer
[not found] ` <50B73598.804-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2012-11-30 15:31 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-12-06 6:21 ` Mahesh Jagannath Salgaonkar
[not found] ` <50C03971.4050104-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
2013-05-30 5:17 ` Mahesh Jagannath Salgaonkar
[not found] ` <51A6E0E4.1000502-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
2013-05-30 6:49 ` Harald Hoyer
[not found] ` <51A6F663.5030804-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2013-05-30 14:23 ` Vivek Goyal
[not found] ` <20130530142318.GC2864-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2013-06-04 8:20 ` Mahesh Jagannath Salgaonkar
[not found] ` <51ADA343.2070100-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
2013-06-04 13:57 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-06-04 14:14 ` Vivek Goyal
[not found] ` <20130604141403.GG4799-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2013-06-04 14:21 ` Vivek Goyal
[not found] ` <20130604142123.GH4799-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2013-06-05 13:44 ` Mahesh Jagannath Salgaonkar
[not found] ` <51AF40BB.5010703-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
2013-06-05 14:55 ` Vivek Goyal
[not found] ` <20130605145504.GE16339-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2013-06-05 15:53 ` Vivek Goyal
[not found] ` <20130605155316.GI16339-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2013-06-06 8:34 ` Mahesh Jagannath Salgaonkar [this message]
2013-06-04 15:19 ` Michael Holzheu
2013-06-05 9:21 ` Mahesh Jagannath Salgaonkar
2013-06-04 8:34 ` Mahesh Jagannath Salgaonkar
[not found] ` <51ADA6AB.5010503-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
2013-06-04 18:42 ` Andrey Borzenkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51B0497D.5060708@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=mahesh-23vcf4htsmix0ybbhkvfkdbpr1lh4cv8@public.gmane.org \
--cc=ananth-xthvdsQ13ZrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=harald-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=hbabu-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=holzheu-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org \
--cc=initramfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=sbest-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=vgoyal-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox