From: "Souza, Jose" <jose.souza@intel.com>
To: "intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org"
<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"De Marchi, Lucas" <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 01/32] drm/i915/rkl: Handle new DPCLKA_CFGCR0 layout
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 23:40:10 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <07ec239b0cb3fe08ac97eca5566d4880ea3ad373.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200618004240.16263-2-lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
On Wed, 2020-06-17 at 17:42 -0700, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> From: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
>
> RKL uses a slightly different bit layout for the DPCLKA_CFGCR0 register.
>
> v2:
> - Fix inverted mask application when updating ICL_DPCLKA_CFGCR0
> - Checkpatch style fixes
>
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
> Bspec: 50287
> Cc: Aditya Swarup <aditya.swarup@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c | 18 +++++++++++++++---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 15 ++++++++++++---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 6 ++++++
> 3 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c
> index ca7bb2294d2b6..8790f221dc77c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c
> @@ -2770,7 +2770,9 @@ hsw_set_signal_levels(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> static u32 icl_dpclka_cfgcr0_clk_off(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> enum phy phy)
> {
> - if (intel_phy_is_combo(dev_priv, phy)) {
> + if (IS_ROCKETLAKE(dev_priv)) {
> + return RKL_DPCLKA_CFGCR0_DDI_CLK_OFF(phy);
> + } else if (intel_phy_is_combo(dev_priv, phy)) {
> return ICL_DPCLKA_CFGCR0_DDI_CLK_OFF(phy);
> } else if (intel_phy_is_tc(dev_priv, phy)) {
> enum tc_port tc_port = intel_port_to_tc(dev_priv,
> @@ -2797,6 +2799,16 @@ static void icl_map_plls_to_ports(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
> (val & icl_dpclka_cfgcr0_clk_off(dev_priv, phy)) == 0);
>
> if (intel_phy_is_combo(dev_priv, phy)) {
> + u32 mask, sel;
> +
> + if (IS_ROCKETLAKE(dev_priv)) {
> + mask = RKL_DPCLKA_CFGCR0_DDI_CLK_SEL_MASK(phy);
> + sel = RKL_DPCLKA_CFGCR0_DDI_CLK_SEL(pll->info->id, phy);
> + } else {
> + mask = ICL_DPCLKA_CFGCR0_DDI_CLK_SEL_MASK(phy);
> + sel = ICL_DPCLKA_CFGCR0_DDI_CLK_SEL(pll->info->id, phy);
> + }
> +
> /*
> * Even though this register references DDIs, note that we
> * want to pass the PHY rather than the port (DDI). For
> @@ -2807,8 +2819,8 @@ static void icl_map_plls_to_ports(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
> * Clock Select chooses the PLL for both DDIA and DDID and
> * drives port A in all cases."
> */
> - val &= ~ICL_DPCLKA_CFGCR0_DDI_CLK_SEL_MASK(phy);
> - val |= ICL_DPCLKA_CFGCR0_DDI_CLK_SEL(pll->info->id, phy);
> + val &= ~mask;
> + val |= sel;
> intel_de_write(dev_priv, ICL_DPCLKA_CFGCR0, val);
> intel_de_posting_read(dev_priv, ICL_DPCLKA_CFGCR0);
> }
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> index 7457813ef2733..6c2bb3354b869 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> @@ -10785,9 +10785,18 @@ static void icl_get_ddi_pll(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, enum port port,
> u32 temp;
>
> if (intel_phy_is_combo(dev_priv, phy)) {
> - temp = intel_de_read(dev_priv, ICL_DPCLKA_CFGCR0) &
> - ICL_DPCLKA_CFGCR0_DDI_CLK_SEL_MASK(phy);
> - id = temp >> ICL_DPCLKA_CFGCR0_DDI_CLK_SEL_SHIFT(phy);
> + u32 mask, shift;
> +
> + if (IS_ROCKETLAKE(dev_priv)) {
> + mask = RKL_DPCLKA_CFGCR0_DDI_CLK_SEL_MASK(phy);
> + shift = RKL_DPCLKA_CFGCR0_DDI_CLK_SEL_SHIFT(phy);
> + } else {
> + mask = ICL_DPCLKA_CFGCR0_DDI_CLK_SEL_MASK(phy);
> + shift = ICL_DPCLKA_CFGCR0_DDI_CLK_SEL_SHIFT(phy);
> + }
> +
> + temp = intel_de_read(dev_priv, ICL_DPCLKA_CFGCR0) & mask;
> + id = temp >> shift;
> port_dpll_id = ICL_PORT_DPLL_DEFAULT;
> } else if (intel_phy_is_tc(dev_priv, phy)) {
> u32 clk_sel = intel_de_read(dev_priv, DDI_CLK_SEL(port)) & DDI_CLK_SEL_MASK;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> index f09120cac89aa..45bda5819abd0 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> @@ -10195,12 +10195,18 @@ enum skl_power_gate {
>
> #define ICL_DPCLKA_CFGCR0 _MMIO(0x164280)
> #define ICL_DPCLKA_CFGCR0_DDI_CLK_OFF(phy) (1 << _PICK(phy, 10, 11, 24))
> +#define RKL_DPCLKA_CFGCR0_DDI_CLK_OFF(phy) REG_BIT((phy) + 10)
> #define ICL_DPCLKA_CFGCR0_TC_CLK_OFF(tc_port) (1 << ((tc_port) < PORT_TC4 ? \
> (tc_port) + 12 : \
> (tc_port) - PORT_TC4 + 21))
> #define ICL_DPCLKA_CFGCR0_DDI_CLK_SEL_SHIFT(phy) ((phy) * 2)
> #define ICL_DPCLKA_CFGCR0_DDI_CLK_SEL_MASK(phy) (3 << ICL_DPCLKA_CFGCR0_DDI_CLK_SEL_SHIFT(phy))
> #define ICL_DPCLKA_CFGCR0_DDI_CLK_SEL(pll, phy) ((pll) << ICL_DPCLKA_CFGCR0_DDI_CLK_SEL_SHIFT(phy))
> +#define RKL_DPCLKA_CFGCR0_DDI_CLK_SEL_SHIFT(phy) _PICK(phy, 0, 2, 4, 27)
> +#define RKL_DPCLKA_CFGCR0_DDI_CLK_SEL_MASK(phy) \
> + (3 << RKL_DPCLKA_CFGCR0_DDI_CLK_SEL_SHIFT(phy))
> +#define RKL_DPCLKA_CFGCR0_DDI_CLK_SEL(pll, phy) \
> + ((pll) << RKL_DPCLKA_CFGCR0_DDI_CLK_SEL_SHIFT(phy))
>
> /* CNL PLL */
> #define DPLL0_ENABLE 0x46010
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-23 23:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-18 0:42 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 00/32] Introduce DG1 Lucas De Marchi
2020-06-18 0:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 01/32] drm/i915/rkl: Handle new DPCLKA_CFGCR0 layout Lucas De Marchi
2020-06-23 23:40 ` Souza, Jose [this message]
2020-06-18 0:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 02/32] drm/i915/rkl: Add DPLL4 support Lucas De Marchi
2020-06-18 0:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 03/32] drm/i915/rkl: Handle HTI Lucas De Marchi
2020-06-23 23:56 ` Souza, Jose
2020-06-18 0:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 04/32] drm/i915/rkl: Add initial workarounds Lucas De Marchi
2020-06-24 0:13 ` Souza, Jose
2020-06-18 0:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 05/32] drm/i915/rkl: Add Wa_14011224835 for PHY B initialization Lucas De Marchi
2020-06-24 0:07 ` Souza, Jose
2020-06-18 0:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 06/32] drm/i915: Add has_master_unit_irq flag Lucas De Marchi
2020-06-18 0:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 07/32] drm/i915/dg1: add initial DG-1 definitions Lucas De Marchi
2020-06-22 7:51 ` Daniel Vetter
2020-06-22 9:55 ` Jani Nikula
2020-06-23 4:54 ` Dave Airlie
2020-06-23 6:17 ` Daniel Vetter
2020-06-18 0:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 08/32] drm/i915/dg1: Add DG1 PCI IDs Lucas De Marchi
2020-06-18 0:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 09/32] drm/i915/dg1: add support for the master unit interrupt Lucas De Marchi
2020-06-18 0:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 10/32] drm/i915/dg1: Remove SHPD_FILTER_CNT register programming Lucas De Marchi
2020-06-18 0:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 11/32] drm/i915/dg1: Add fake PCH Lucas De Marchi
2020-06-18 0:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 12/32] drm/i915/dg1: Initialize RAWCLK properly Lucas De Marchi
2020-06-18 0:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 13/32] drm/i915/dg1: Define MOCS table for DG1 Lucas De Marchi
2020-06-18 0:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 14/32] drm/i915/dg1: Add DG1 power wells Lucas De Marchi
2020-06-18 0:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 15/32] drm/i915/dg1: Increase mmio size to 4MB Lucas De Marchi
2020-06-18 0:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 16/32] drm/i915/dg1: Wait for pcode/uncore handshake at startup Lucas De Marchi
2020-06-18 0:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 17/32] drm/i915/dg1: Add DPLL macros for DG1 Lucas De Marchi
2020-06-18 0:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 18/32] drm/i915/dg1: Add and setup DPLLs " Lucas De Marchi
2020-06-18 0:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 19/32] drm/i915/dg1: Enable DPLL " Lucas De Marchi
2020-06-18 0:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 20/32] drm/i915/dg1: add hpd interrupt handling Lucas De Marchi
2020-06-22 18:35 ` Imre Deak
2020-06-22 20:43 ` Lucas De Marchi
2020-06-22 20:54 ` Imre Deak
2020-06-22 21:59 ` Lucas De Marchi
2020-06-18 0:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 21/32] drm/i915/dg1: invert HPD pins Lucas De Marchi
2020-06-18 0:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 22/32] drm/i915/dg1: gmbus pin mapping Lucas De Marchi
2020-06-18 0:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 23/32] drm/i915/dg1: Enable first 2 ports for DG1 Lucas De Marchi
2020-06-18 0:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 24/32] drm/i915/dg1: Don't program PHY_MISC for PHY-C and PHY-D Lucas De Marchi
2020-06-18 0:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 25/32] drm/i915/dg1: Update comp master/slave relationships for PHYs Lucas De Marchi
2020-06-18 0:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 26/32] drm/i915/dg1: Update voltage swing tables for DP Lucas De Marchi
2020-06-18 0:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 27/32] drm/i915/dg1: provide port/phy mapping for vbt Lucas De Marchi
2020-06-18 0:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 28/32] drm/i915/dg1: map/unmap pll clocks Lucas De Marchi
2020-06-18 0:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 29/32] drm/i915/dg1: enable PORT C/D aka D/E Lucas De Marchi
2020-06-18 0:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 30/32] drm/i915/dg1: Load DMC Lucas De Marchi
2020-06-18 0:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 31/32] drm/i915/dg1: Add initial DG1 workarounds Lucas De Marchi
2020-06-18 0:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 32/32] drm/i915/dg1: DG1 does not support DC6 Lucas De Marchi
2020-06-18 0:56 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for Introduce DG1 (rev2) Patchwork
2020-06-18 0:57 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2020-06-18 1:18 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=07ec239b0cb3fe08ac97eca5566d4880ea3ad373.camel@intel.com \
--to=jose.souza@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox