From: "Souza, Jose" <jose.souza@intel.com>
To: "intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org"
<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"De Marchi, Lucas" <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 04/32] drm/i915/rkl: Add initial workarounds
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2020 00:13:18 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ec4a4921503507aa42e6eff61ffebe78a895cf26.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200618004240.16263-5-lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
On Wed, 2020-06-17 at 17:42 -0700, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> From: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
>
> RKL and TGL share some general gen12 workarounds, but each platform also
> has its own platform-specific workarounds.
>
> v2:
> - Add Wa_1604555607 for RKL. This makes RKL's ctx WA list identical to
> TGL's, so we'll have both functions call the tgl_ function for now;
> this workaround isn't listed for DG1 so we don't want to add it to
> the general gen12_ function.
>
> Cc: Matt Atwood <matthew.s.atwood@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_sprite.c | 5 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c | 88 +++++++++++++--------
> 2 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_sprite.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_sprite.c
> index 3cd461bf91311..63ac79f88fa21 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_sprite.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_sprite.c
> @@ -2842,8 +2842,9 @@ static bool skl_plane_format_mod_supported(struct drm_plane *_plane,
> static bool gen12_plane_supports_mc_ccs(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> enum plane_id plane_id)
> {
> - /* Wa_14010477008:tgl[a0..c0] */
> - if (IS_TGL_REVID(dev_priv, TGL_REVID_A0, TGL_REVID_C0))
> + /* Wa_14010477008:tgl[a0..c0],rkl[all] */
> + if (IS_ROCKETLAKE(dev_priv) ||
> + IS_TGL_REVID(dev_priv, TGL_REVID_A0, TGL_REVID_C0))
> return false;
>
> return plane_id < PLANE_SPRITE4;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c
> index 2da366821ddaf..741710ca2b9a5 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c
> @@ -596,8 +596,8 @@ static void icl_ctx_workarounds_init(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
> wa_masked_en(wal, GEN9_ROW_CHICKEN4, GEN11_DIS_PICK_2ND_EU);
> }
>
> -static void tgl_ctx_workarounds_init(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
> - struct i915_wa_list *wal)
> +static void gen12_ctx_workarounds_init(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
> + struct i915_wa_list *wal)
> {
> /*
> * Wa_1409142259:tgl
> @@ -607,12 +607,28 @@ static void tgl_ctx_workarounds_init(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
> * Wa_1409207793:tgl
> * Wa_1409178076:tgl
> * Wa_1408979724:tgl
> + * Wa_14010443199:rkl
> + * Wa_14010698770:rkl
> */
> WA_SET_BIT_MASKED(GEN11_COMMON_SLICE_CHICKEN3,
> GEN12_DISABLE_CPS_AWARE_COLOR_PIPE);
>
> + /* WaDisableGPGPUMidThreadPreemption:gen12 */
> + WA_SET_FIELD_MASKED(GEN8_CS_CHICKEN1,
> + GEN9_PREEMPT_GPGPU_LEVEL_MASK,
> + GEN9_PREEMPT_GPGPU_THREAD_GROUP_LEVEL);
> +}
> +
> +static void tgl_ctx_workarounds_init(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
> + struct i915_wa_list *wal)
> +{
> + gen12_ctx_workarounds_init(engine, wal);
> +
> /*
> - * Wa_1604555607:gen12 and Wa_1608008084:gen12
> + * Wa_1604555607:tgl,rkl
> + *
> + * Note that the implementation of this workaround is further modified
> + * according to the FF_MODE2 guidance given by Wa_1608008084:gen12.
> * FF_MODE2 register will return the wrong value when read. The default
> * value for this register is zero for all fields and there are no bit
> * masks. So instead of doing a RMW we should just write the GS Timer
> @@ -623,11 +639,6 @@ static void tgl_ctx_workarounds_init(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
> FF_MODE2_GS_TIMER_MASK | FF_MODE2_TDS_TIMER_MASK,
> FF_MODE2_GS_TIMER_224 | FF_MODE2_TDS_TIMER_128,
> 0);
> -
> - /* WaDisableGPGPUMidThreadPreemption:tgl */
> - WA_SET_FIELD_MASKED(GEN8_CS_CHICKEN1,
> - GEN9_PREEMPT_GPGPU_LEVEL_MASK,
> - GEN9_PREEMPT_GPGPU_THREAD_GROUP_LEVEL);
> }
>
> static void
> @@ -642,8 +653,10 @@ __intel_engine_init_ctx_wa(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
>
> wa_init_start(wal, name, engine->name);
>
> - if (IS_GEN(i915, 12))
> + if (IS_ROCKETLAKE(i915) || IS_TIGERLAKE(i915))
> tgl_ctx_workarounds_init(engine, wal);
> + else if (IS_GEN(i915, 12))
> + gen12_ctx_workarounds_init(engine, wal);
> else if (IS_GEN(i915, 11))
> icl_ctx_workarounds_init(engine, wal);
> else if (IS_CANNONLAKE(i915))
> @@ -1176,9 +1189,16 @@ icl_gt_workarounds_init(struct drm_i915_private *i915, struct i915_wa_list *wal)
> }
>
> static void
> -tgl_gt_workarounds_init(struct drm_i915_private *i915, struct i915_wa_list *wal)
> +gen12_gt_workarounds_init(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
> + struct i915_wa_list *wal)
> {
> wa_init_mcr(i915, wal);
> +}
> +
> +static void
> +tgl_gt_workarounds_init(struct drm_i915_private *i915, struct i915_wa_list *wal)
> +{
> + gen12_gt_workarounds_init(i915, wal);
>
> /* Wa_1409420604:tgl */
> if (IS_TGL_REVID(i915, TGL_REVID_A0, TGL_REVID_A0))
> @@ -1196,8 +1216,10 @@ tgl_gt_workarounds_init(struct drm_i915_private *i915, struct i915_wa_list *wal)
> static void
> gt_init_workarounds(struct drm_i915_private *i915, struct i915_wa_list *wal)
> {
> - if (IS_GEN(i915, 12))
> + if (IS_TIGERLAKE(i915))
> tgl_gt_workarounds_init(i915, wal);
> + else if (IS_GEN(i915, 12))
> + gen12_gt_workarounds_init(i915, wal);
> else if (IS_GEN(i915, 11))
> icl_gt_workarounds_init(i915, wal);
> else if (IS_CANNONLAKE(i915))
> @@ -1629,18 +1651,6 @@ rcs_engine_wa_init(struct intel_engine_cs *engine, struct i915_wa_list *wal)
> GEN9_CTX_PREEMPT_REG,
> GEN12_DISABLE_POSH_BUSY_FF_DOP_CG);
>
> - /*
> - * Wa_1607030317:tgl
> - * Wa_1607186500:tgl
> - * Wa_1607297627:tgl there is 3 entries for this WA on BSpec, 2
> - * of then says it is fixed on B0 the other one says it is
> - * permanent
> - */
> - wa_masked_en(wal,
> - GEN6_RC_SLEEP_PSMI_CONTROL,
> - GEN12_WAIT_FOR_EVENT_POWER_DOWN_DISABLE |
> - GEN8_RC_SEMA_IDLE_MSG_DISABLE);
> -
> /*
> * Wa_1606679103:tgl
> * (see also Wa_1606682166:icl)
> @@ -1659,24 +1669,38 @@ rcs_engine_wa_init(struct intel_engine_cs *engine, struct i915_wa_list *wal)
> VSUNIT_CLKGATE_DIS_TGL);
> }
>
> - if (IS_TIGERLAKE(i915)) {
> - /* Wa_1606931601:tgl */
> + if (IS_ROCKETLAKE(i915) || IS_TIGERLAKE(i915)) {
> + /* Wa_1606931601:tgl,rkl */
> wa_masked_en(wal, GEN7_ROW_CHICKEN2, GEN12_DISABLE_EARLY_READ);
>
> - /* Wa_1409804808:tgl */
> + /* Wa_1409804808:tgl,rkl */
> wa_masked_en(wal, GEN7_ROW_CHICKEN2,
> GEN12_PUSH_CONST_DEREF_HOLD_DIS);
>
> - /* Wa_1606700617:tgl */
> - wa_masked_en(wal,
> - GEN9_CS_DEBUG_MODE1,
> - FF_DOP_CLOCK_GATE_DISABLE);
> -
> /*
> * Wa_1409085225:tgl
> - * Wa_14010229206:tgl
> + * Wa_14010229206:tgl,rkl
> */
> wa_masked_en(wal, GEN9_ROW_CHICKEN4, GEN12_DISABLE_TDL_PUSH);
> +
> + /*
> + * Wa_1607030317:tgl
> + * Wa_1607186500:tgl
> + * Wa_1607297627:tgl,rkl there are multiple entries for this
> + * WA in the BSpec; some indicate this is an A0-only WA,
> + * others indicate it applies to all steppings.
> + */
> + wa_masked_en(wal,
> + GEN6_RC_SLEEP_PSMI_CONTROL,
> + GEN12_WAIT_FOR_EVENT_POWER_DOWN_DISABLE |
> + GEN8_RC_SEMA_IDLE_MSG_DISABLE);
> + }
> +
> + if (IS_TIGERLAKE(i915)) {
> + /* Wa_1606700617:tgl */
> + wa_masked_en(wal,
> + GEN9_CS_DEBUG_MODE1,
> + FF_DOP_CLOCK_GATE_DISABLE);
RKL might need this one too under the number 14010230801 but is still pending.
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
> }
>
> if (IS_GEN(i915, 11)) {
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-24 0:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-18 0:42 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 00/32] Introduce DG1 Lucas De Marchi
2020-06-18 0:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 01/32] drm/i915/rkl: Handle new DPCLKA_CFGCR0 layout Lucas De Marchi
2020-06-23 23:40 ` Souza, Jose
2020-06-18 0:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 02/32] drm/i915/rkl: Add DPLL4 support Lucas De Marchi
2020-06-18 0:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 03/32] drm/i915/rkl: Handle HTI Lucas De Marchi
2020-06-23 23:56 ` Souza, Jose
2020-06-18 0:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 04/32] drm/i915/rkl: Add initial workarounds Lucas De Marchi
2020-06-24 0:13 ` Souza, Jose [this message]
2020-06-18 0:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 05/32] drm/i915/rkl: Add Wa_14011224835 for PHY B initialization Lucas De Marchi
2020-06-24 0:07 ` Souza, Jose
2020-06-18 0:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 06/32] drm/i915: Add has_master_unit_irq flag Lucas De Marchi
2020-06-18 0:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 07/32] drm/i915/dg1: add initial DG-1 definitions Lucas De Marchi
2020-06-22 7:51 ` Daniel Vetter
2020-06-22 9:55 ` Jani Nikula
2020-06-23 4:54 ` Dave Airlie
2020-06-23 6:17 ` Daniel Vetter
2020-06-18 0:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 08/32] drm/i915/dg1: Add DG1 PCI IDs Lucas De Marchi
2020-06-18 0:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 09/32] drm/i915/dg1: add support for the master unit interrupt Lucas De Marchi
2020-06-18 0:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 10/32] drm/i915/dg1: Remove SHPD_FILTER_CNT register programming Lucas De Marchi
2020-06-18 0:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 11/32] drm/i915/dg1: Add fake PCH Lucas De Marchi
2020-06-18 0:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 12/32] drm/i915/dg1: Initialize RAWCLK properly Lucas De Marchi
2020-06-18 0:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 13/32] drm/i915/dg1: Define MOCS table for DG1 Lucas De Marchi
2020-06-18 0:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 14/32] drm/i915/dg1: Add DG1 power wells Lucas De Marchi
2020-06-18 0:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 15/32] drm/i915/dg1: Increase mmio size to 4MB Lucas De Marchi
2020-06-18 0:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 16/32] drm/i915/dg1: Wait for pcode/uncore handshake at startup Lucas De Marchi
2020-06-18 0:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 17/32] drm/i915/dg1: Add DPLL macros for DG1 Lucas De Marchi
2020-06-18 0:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 18/32] drm/i915/dg1: Add and setup DPLLs " Lucas De Marchi
2020-06-18 0:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 19/32] drm/i915/dg1: Enable DPLL " Lucas De Marchi
2020-06-18 0:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 20/32] drm/i915/dg1: add hpd interrupt handling Lucas De Marchi
2020-06-22 18:35 ` Imre Deak
2020-06-22 20:43 ` Lucas De Marchi
2020-06-22 20:54 ` Imre Deak
2020-06-22 21:59 ` Lucas De Marchi
2020-06-18 0:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 21/32] drm/i915/dg1: invert HPD pins Lucas De Marchi
2020-06-18 0:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 22/32] drm/i915/dg1: gmbus pin mapping Lucas De Marchi
2020-06-18 0:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 23/32] drm/i915/dg1: Enable first 2 ports for DG1 Lucas De Marchi
2020-06-18 0:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 24/32] drm/i915/dg1: Don't program PHY_MISC for PHY-C and PHY-D Lucas De Marchi
2020-06-18 0:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 25/32] drm/i915/dg1: Update comp master/slave relationships for PHYs Lucas De Marchi
2020-06-18 0:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 26/32] drm/i915/dg1: Update voltage swing tables for DP Lucas De Marchi
2020-06-18 0:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 27/32] drm/i915/dg1: provide port/phy mapping for vbt Lucas De Marchi
2020-06-18 0:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 28/32] drm/i915/dg1: map/unmap pll clocks Lucas De Marchi
2020-06-18 0:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 29/32] drm/i915/dg1: enable PORT C/D aka D/E Lucas De Marchi
2020-06-18 0:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 30/32] drm/i915/dg1: Load DMC Lucas De Marchi
2020-06-18 0:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 31/32] drm/i915/dg1: Add initial DG1 workarounds Lucas De Marchi
2020-06-18 0:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 32/32] drm/i915/dg1: DG1 does not support DC6 Lucas De Marchi
2020-06-18 0:56 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for Introduce DG1 (rev2) Patchwork
2020-06-18 0:57 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2020-06-18 1:18 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ec4a4921503507aa42e6eff61ffebe78a895cf26.camel@intel.com \
--to=jose.souza@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox