From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915/selftests: Verify whitelist of context registers
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2019 12:10:02 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <081417c2-706f-5ae9-879a-e8a59b8e335a@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <155610383229.19502.12508638103825220969@skylake-alporthouse-com>
On 24/04/2019 12:03, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Quoting Chris Wilson (2019-04-24 11:00:03)
>> Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2019-04-16 15:50:27)
>>>
>>> On 16/04/2019 10:12, Chris Wilson wrote:
>>>> + rq = ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
>>>> + with_intel_runtime_pm(engine->i915, wakeref)
>>>> + rq = i915_request_alloc(engine, ctx);
>>>> + if (IS_ERR(rq))
>>>> + goto err_unpin;
>>>> +
>>>> + if (engine->emit_init_breadcrumb) { /* Be nice if we hang */
>>>> + err = engine->emit_init_breadcrumb(rq);
>>>> + if (err)
>>>> + goto err_request;
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + err = engine->emit_bb_start(rq, batch->node.start, 0, 0);
>>>
>>> Why is batch needed here when everything else is happy to run from the ring?
>>
>> Because we are playing with HW registers, I want reset to work safely.
>> So long as we have init_breadcrumb, the payload scrubbing should work.
>> Ok.
>
> No, I am an idiot. The batch is so that we emulate userspace with
> unprivileged execution
Okay, keep the r-b. :)
Regards,
Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-24 11:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-16 8:10 [PATCH v2 1/4] drm/i915: Verify workarounds immediately after application Chris Wilson
2019-04-16 8:10 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] drm/i915: Verify the engine workarounds stick on application Chris Wilson
2019-04-16 9:43 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-04-16 9:57 ` Chris Wilson
2019-04-16 10:36 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-04-16 10:49 ` Chris Wilson
2019-04-16 8:10 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] drm/i915: Make workaround verification *optional* Chris Wilson
2019-04-16 9:48 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-04-16 11:24 ` Chris Wilson
2019-04-16 8:10 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] drm/i915/selftests: Verify whitelist of context registers Chris Wilson
2019-04-16 9:12 ` [PATCH] " Chris Wilson
2019-04-16 14:50 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-04-24 10:00 ` Chris Wilson
2019-04-24 11:03 ` Chris Wilson
2019-04-24 11:10 ` Tvrtko Ursulin [this message]
2019-04-16 21:28 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] " kbuild test robot
2019-04-16 9:18 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] drm/i915: Verify workarounds immediately after application Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-04-16 11:10 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [v2,1/4] drm/i915: Verify workarounds immediately after application (rev2) Patchwork
2019-04-16 15:07 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2019-04-15 16:00 [PATCH 4/4] drm/i915/selftests: Verify whitelist of context registers Chris Wilson
2019-04-15 17:41 ` [PATCH] " Chris Wilson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=081417c2-706f-5ae9-879a-e8a59b8e335a@linux.intel.com \
--to=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox