public inbox for intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Souza, Jose" <jose.souza@intel.com>
To: "Nikula, Jani" <jani.nikula@intel.com>,
	"intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org"
	<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: "De Marchi, Lucas" <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>,
	"chris@chris-wilson.co.uk" <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 3/8] drm/i915: add new helpers for accessing stepping info
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2021 20:50:34 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <08b49ea1f0eea0d93e0991c5cbdfd150610950f1.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4f87fcc238ec8f430a4adce02f66d210ca99714d.1615211711.git.jani.nikula@intel.com>

On Mon, 2021-03-08 at 15:56 +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> Add new runtime info field for stepping. Add new helpers for accessing
> them. As we'll be switching platforms over to the new scheme
> incrementally, check for non-initialized steppings.
> 
> In case a platform does not have separate display and gt steppings, it's
> okay to use a common shorthand. However, in this case the display
> stepping must not be initialized, and gt stepping is the single point of
> truth.
> 
> v2: Rename stepping->step
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h          | 24 +++++++++++++++---------
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.h |  4 ++++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.h        | 14 ++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> index 02170edd6628..a543b1ad9ba9 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> @@ -1274,6 +1274,21 @@ static inline struct drm_i915_private *pdev_to_i915(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>  #define IS_REVID(p, since, until) \
>  	(INTEL_REVID(p) >= (since) && INTEL_REVID(p) <= (until))
>  
> 
> +#define INTEL_DISPLAY_STEP(__i915) (RUNTIME_INFO(__i915)->step.disp_stepping)
> +#define INTEL_GT_STEP(__i915) (RUNTIME_INFO(__i915)->step.gt_stepping)
> +
> +#define IS_DISPLAY_STEP(__i915, since, until) \
> +	(drm_WARN_ON(&(__i915)->drm, INTEL_DISPLAY_STEP(__i915) == STEP_NONE), \
> +	 INTEL_DISPLAY_STEP(__i915) >= (since) && INTEL_DISPLAY_STEP(__i915) <= (until))
> +
> +#define IS_GT_STEP(__i915, since, until) \
> +	(drm_WARN_ON(&(__i915)->drm, INTEL_GT_STEP(__i915) == STEP_NONE), \
> +	 INTEL_GT_STEP(__i915) >= (since) && INTEL_GT_STEP(__i915) <= (until))
> +
> +#define IS_STEP(p, since, until) \
> +	(drm_WARN_ON(&(__i915)->drm, INTEL_DISPLAY_STEP(__i915) != STEP_NONE), \

(drm_WARN_ON(&(__i915)->drm, INTEL_DISPLAY_STEP(__i915) == STEP_NONE), \

But I don't think IS_STEP() is useful, better use IS_DISPLAY/GT_STEP even for platforms with the same display and GT version.

With the change above:

Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>

> +	 INTEL_GT_STEP(__i915, since, until))
> +
>  static __always_inline unsigned int
>  __platform_mask_index(const struct intel_runtime_info *info,
>  		      enum intel_platform p)
> @@ -1511,15 +1526,6 @@ enum {
>  #define IS_JSL_EHL_REVID(p, since, until) \
>  	(IS_JSL_EHL(p) && IS_REVID(p, since, until))
>  
> 
> -enum {
> -	STEP_A0,
> -	STEP_A2,
> -	STEP_B0,
> -	STEP_B1,
> -	STEP_C0,
> -	STEP_D0,
> -};
> -
>  static inline const struct i915_rev_steppings *
>  tgl_stepping_get(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>  {
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.h
> index d44f64b57b7a..f84569e8e711 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.h
> @@ -27,6 +27,8 @@
>  
> 
>  #include <uapi/drm/i915_drm.h>
>  
> 
> +#include "intel_step.h"
> +
>  #include "display/intel_display.h"
>  
> 
>  #include "gt/intel_engine_types.h"
> @@ -225,6 +227,8 @@ struct intel_runtime_info {
>  	u8 num_scalers[I915_MAX_PIPES];
>  
> 
>  	u32 rawclk_freq;
> +
> +	struct i915_rev_steppings step;
>  };
>  
> 
>  struct intel_driver_caps {
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.h
> index af922ae3bb4e..8b3ef19d935b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.h
> @@ -22,4 +22,18 @@ extern const struct i915_rev_steppings tgl_uy_revid_step_tbl[TGL_UY_REVID_STEP_T
>  extern const struct i915_rev_steppings tgl_revid_step_tbl[TGL_REVID_STEP_TBL_SIZE];
>  extern const struct i915_rev_steppings adls_revid_step_tbl[ADLS_REVID_STEP_TBL_SIZE];
>  
> 
> +/*
> + * Symbolic steppings that do not match the hardware. These are valid both as gt
> + * and display steppings as symbolic names.
> + */
> +enum intel_step {
> +	STEP_NONE = 0,
> +	STEP_A0,
> +	STEP_A2,
> +	STEP_B0,
> +	STEP_B1,
> +	STEP_C0,
> +	STEP_D0,
> +};
> +
>  #endif /* __INTEL_STEP_H__ */

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2021-03-25 20:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-08 13:56 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 0/8] drm/i915: refactor KBL/TGL/ADLS stepping scheme Jani Nikula
2021-03-08 13:56 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 1/8] drm/i915: remove unused ADLS_REVID_* macros Jani Nikula
2021-03-08 13:56 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 2/8] drm/i915: split out stepping info to a new file Jani Nikula
2021-03-09  0:13   ` Lucas De Marchi
2021-03-17 17:02     ` Jani Nikula
2021-03-08 13:56 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 3/8] drm/i915: add new helpers for accessing stepping info Jani Nikula
2021-03-25 20:50   ` Souza, Jose [this message]
2021-03-26  8:49     ` Jani Nikula
2021-03-26 13:22       ` Jani Nikula
2021-03-08 13:56 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 4/8] drm/i915: switch KBL to the new stepping scheme Jani Nikula
2021-03-25 20:54   ` Souza, Jose
2021-03-08 13:56 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 5/8] drm/i915: switch TGL and ADL " Jani Nikula
2021-03-25 20:58   ` Souza, Jose
2021-03-08 13:56 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 6/8] drm/i915: rename DISP_STEPPING->DISPLAY_STEP and GT_STEPPING->GT_STEP Jani Nikula
2021-03-08 13:56 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 7/8] drm/i915: rename disp_stepping->display_step and gt_stepping->gt_step Jani Nikula
2021-03-08 13:56 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 8/8] drm/i915: rename i915_rev_steppings->intel_step_info Jani Nikula
2021-03-25 21:00   ` Souza, Jose
2021-03-08 15:10 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: refactor KBL/TGL/ADLS stepping scheme (rev2) Patchwork
2021-03-08 15:39 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2021-03-08 22:52 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=08b49ea1f0eea0d93e0991c5cbdfd150610950f1.camel@intel.com \
    --to=jose.souza@intel.com \
    --cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
    --cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox