* [PATCH] drm/xe/compat: Remove unused i915_reg.h from compat header @ 2026-02-23 17:10 Uma Shankar 2026-02-23 17:37 ` ✓ i915.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork 2026-02-24 13:07 ` [PATCH] " Jani Nikula 0 siblings, 2 replies; 11+ messages in thread From: Uma Shankar @ 2026-02-23 17:10 UTC (permalink / raw) To: intel-gfx, intel-xe; +Cc: jani.nikula, ville.syrjala, Uma Shankar Display Code is made independent of i915_reg.h, hence it can be dropped from compat header. Signed-off-by: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/xe/compat-i915-headers/i915_reg.h | 6 ------ 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/compat-i915-headers/i915_reg.h diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/compat-i915-headers/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/compat-i915-headers/i915_reg.h deleted file mode 100644 index 8619ec015ad4..000000000000 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/compat-i915-headers/i915_reg.h +++ /dev/null @@ -1,6 +0,0 @@ -/* SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT */ -/* - * Copyright © 2023 Intel Corporation - */ - -#include "../../i915/i915_reg.h" -- 2.50.1 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* ✓ i915.CI.BAT: success for drm/xe/compat: Remove unused i915_reg.h from compat header 2026-02-23 17:10 [PATCH] drm/xe/compat: Remove unused i915_reg.h from compat header Uma Shankar @ 2026-02-23 17:37 ` Patchwork 2026-02-24 13:07 ` [PATCH] " Jani Nikula 1 sibling, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread From: Patchwork @ 2026-02-23 17:37 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Uma Shankar; +Cc: intel-gfx [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2011 bytes --] == Series Details == Series: drm/xe/compat: Remove unused i915_reg.h from compat header URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/161993/ State : success == Summary == CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_18022 -> Patchwork_161993v1 ==================================================== Summary ------- **SUCCESS** No regressions found. External URL: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_161993v1/index.html Participating hosts (43 -> 41) ------------------------------ Missing (2): bat-dg2-13 fi-snb-2520m Known issues ------------ Here are the changes found in Patchwork_161993v1 that come from known issues: ### IGT changes ### #### Issues hit #### * igt@core_hotunplug@unbind-rebind: - bat-apl-1: [PASS][1] -> [ABORT][2] ([i915#15677]) [1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_18022/bat-apl-1/igt@core_hotunplug@unbind-rebind.html [2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_161993v1/bat-apl-1/igt@core_hotunplug@unbind-rebind.html #### Possible fixes #### * igt@i915_selftest@live@workarounds: - bat-arls-6: [DMESG-FAIL][3] ([i915#12061]) -> [PASS][4] +1 other test pass [3]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_18022/bat-arls-6/igt@i915_selftest@live@workarounds.html [4]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_161993v1/bat-arls-6/igt@i915_selftest@live@workarounds.html [i915#12061]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/i915/kernel/-/issues/12061 [i915#15677]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/i915/kernel/-/issues/15677 Build changes ------------- * Linux: CI_DRM_18022 -> Patchwork_161993v1 CI-20190529: 20190529 CI_DRM_18022: 45a3045fc0dc46a893cb8bbe304afafd4120c904 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux IGT_8765: 8765 Patchwork_161993v1: 45a3045fc0dc46a893cb8bbe304afafd4120c904 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux == Logs == For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_161993v1/index.html [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2621 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drm/xe/compat: Remove unused i915_reg.h from compat header 2026-02-23 17:10 [PATCH] drm/xe/compat: Remove unused i915_reg.h from compat header Uma Shankar 2026-02-23 17:37 ` ✓ i915.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork @ 2026-02-24 13:07 ` Jani Nikula 2026-02-24 13:25 ` Shankar, Uma 2026-02-25 16:40 ` Shankar, Uma 1 sibling, 2 replies; 11+ messages in thread From: Jani Nikula @ 2026-02-24 13:07 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Uma Shankar, intel-gfx, intel-xe; +Cc: ville.syrjala, Uma Shankar On Mon, 23 Feb 2026, Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com> wrote: > Display Code is made independent of i915_reg.h, hence > it can be dropped from compat header. > > Signed-off-by: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com> I already sent the same patch earlier, but *shrug*. Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/compat-i915-headers/i915_reg.h | 6 ------ > 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-) > delete mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/compat-i915-headers/i915_reg.h > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/compat-i915-headers/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/compat-i915-headers/i915_reg.h > deleted file mode 100644 > index 8619ec015ad4..000000000000 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/compat-i915-headers/i915_reg.h > +++ /dev/null > @@ -1,6 +0,0 @@ > -/* SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT */ > -/* > - * Copyright © 2023 Intel Corporation > - */ > - > -#include "../../i915/i915_reg.h" -- Jani Nikula, Intel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* RE: [PATCH] drm/xe/compat: Remove unused i915_reg.h from compat header 2026-02-24 13:07 ` [PATCH] " Jani Nikula @ 2026-02-24 13:25 ` Shankar, Uma 2026-02-25 16:40 ` Shankar, Uma 1 sibling, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread From: Shankar, Uma @ 2026-02-24 13:25 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Nikula, Jani, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com > -----Original Message----- > From: Nikula, Jani <jani.nikula@intel.com> > Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2026 6:37 PM > To: Shankar, Uma <uma.shankar@intel.com>; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; > intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org > Cc: ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com; Shankar, Uma <uma.shankar@intel.com> > Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/xe/compat: Remove unused i915_reg.h from compat > header > > On Mon, 23 Feb 2026, Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com> wrote: > > Display Code is made independent of i915_reg.h, hence it can be > > dropped from compat header. > > > > Signed-off-by: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com> > > I already sent the same patch earlier, but *shrug*. Oh, sorry missed that Jani. It was on my ToDo list from last week 😊 Thanks for the review. Regards, Uma Shankar > Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> > > > --- > > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/compat-i915-headers/i915_reg.h | 6 ------ > > 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-) > > delete mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/compat-i915-headers/i915_reg.h > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/compat-i915-headers/i915_reg.h > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/compat-i915-headers/i915_reg.h > > deleted file mode 100644 > > index 8619ec015ad4..000000000000 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/compat-i915-headers/i915_reg.h > > +++ /dev/null > > @@ -1,6 +0,0 @@ > > -/* SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT */ > > -/* > > - * Copyright © 2023 Intel Corporation > > - */ > > - > > -#include "../../i915/i915_reg.h" > > -- > Jani Nikula, Intel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* RE: [PATCH] drm/xe/compat: Remove unused i915_reg.h from compat header 2026-02-24 13:07 ` [PATCH] " Jani Nikula 2026-02-24 13:25 ` Shankar, Uma @ 2026-02-25 16:40 ` Shankar, Uma 2026-02-25 17:43 ` Matt Roper 1 sibling, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: Shankar, Uma @ 2026-02-25 16:40 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Nikula, Jani, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com > -----Original Message----- > From: Nikula, Jani <jani.nikula@intel.com> > Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2026 6:37 PM > To: Shankar, Uma <uma.shankar@intel.com>; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; > intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org > Cc: ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com; Shankar, Uma <uma.shankar@intel.com> > Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/xe/compat: Remove unused i915_reg.h from compat > header > > On Mon, 23 Feb 2026, Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com> wrote: > > Display Code is made independent of i915_reg.h, hence it can be > > dropped from compat header. > > > > Signed-off-by: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com> > > I already sent the same patch earlier, but *shrug*. > > Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Pushed to drm-xe-next. Thanks for the review. Regards, Uma Shankar > > --- > > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/compat-i915-headers/i915_reg.h | 6 ------ > > 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-) > > delete mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/compat-i915-headers/i915_reg.h > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/compat-i915-headers/i915_reg.h > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/compat-i915-headers/i915_reg.h > > deleted file mode 100644 > > index 8619ec015ad4..000000000000 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/compat-i915-headers/i915_reg.h > > +++ /dev/null > > @@ -1,6 +0,0 @@ > > -/* SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT */ > > -/* > > - * Copyright © 2023 Intel Corporation > > - */ > > - > > -#include "../../i915/i915_reg.h" > > -- > Jani Nikula, Intel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drm/xe/compat: Remove unused i915_reg.h from compat header 2026-02-25 16:40 ` Shankar, Uma @ 2026-02-25 17:43 ` Matt Roper 2026-02-25 18:11 ` Jani Nikula 0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: Matt Roper @ 2026-02-25 17:43 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Shankar, Uma Cc: Nikula, Jani, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org, ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com On Wed, Feb 25, 2026 at 04:40:23PM +0000, Shankar, Uma wrote: > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Nikula, Jani <jani.nikula@intel.com> > > Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2026 6:37 PM > > To: Shankar, Uma <uma.shankar@intel.com>; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; > > intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org > > Cc: ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com; Shankar, Uma <uma.shankar@intel.com> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/xe/compat: Remove unused i915_reg.h from compat > > header > > > > On Mon, 23 Feb 2026, Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com> wrote: > > > Display Code is made independent of i915_reg.h, hence it can be > > > dropped from compat header. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com> > > > > I already sent the same patch earlier, but *shrug*. > > > > Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> > > Pushed to drm-xe-next. Thanks for the review. Even though this is an Xe patch it might have been better to send this one through drm-intel-next rather than drm-xe-next since drm-xe-next doesn't have the prerequisite display patches yet to make this header removal possible. So at the moment the build of drm-xe-next is broken. Not a huge issue since drm-tip is fine, and drm-xe-next will likely be fixed soon whenever a backmerge happens, but I figured I should point it out. Matt > > Regards, > Uma Shankar > > > > --- > > > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/compat-i915-headers/i915_reg.h | 6 ------ > > > 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-) > > > delete mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/compat-i915-headers/i915_reg.h > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/compat-i915-headers/i915_reg.h > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/compat-i915-headers/i915_reg.h > > > deleted file mode 100644 > > > index 8619ec015ad4..000000000000 > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/compat-i915-headers/i915_reg.h > > > +++ /dev/null > > > @@ -1,6 +0,0 @@ > > > -/* SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT */ > > > -/* > > > - * Copyright © 2023 Intel Corporation > > > - */ > > > - > > > -#include "../../i915/i915_reg.h" > > > > -- > > Jani Nikula, Intel -- Matt Roper Graphics Software Engineer Linux GPU Platform Enablement Intel Corporation ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drm/xe/compat: Remove unused i915_reg.h from compat header 2026-02-25 17:43 ` Matt Roper @ 2026-02-25 18:11 ` Jani Nikula 2026-02-26 6:54 ` Shankar, Uma 0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: Jani Nikula @ 2026-02-25 18:11 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Matt Roper, Shankar, Uma Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org, ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com, Rodrigo Vivi, Thomas Hellström, Matthew Brost On Wed, 25 Feb 2026, Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 25, 2026 at 04:40:23PM +0000, Shankar, Uma wrote: >> Pushed to drm-xe-next. Thanks for the review. > > Even though this is an Xe patch it might have been better to send this > one through drm-intel-next rather than drm-xe-next since drm-xe-next > doesn't have the prerequisite display patches yet to make this header > removal possible. So at the moment the build of drm-xe-next is broken. > Not a huge issue since drm-tip is fine, and drm-xe-next will likely be > fixed soon whenever a backmerge happens, but I figured I should point it > out. On the contrary, I think it is an issue that warrants a revert. It's a hard requirement that committers *always* build the branch they apply patches to before pushing, no exceptions. CI doesn't guarantee that at all. With the build already broken, you can't do that, and more breakage can slip in until it's fixed. It'll take a drm-intel-next pull request to drm-next, and then a drm-next backmerge to drm-xe-next to fix this, and we don't generally want to rush that to hotfix build issues like this. The build failure *before* pushing is an indication a backmerge might be needed, and that's the normal order of things. BR, Jani. -- Jani Nikula, Intel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* RE: [PATCH] drm/xe/compat: Remove unused i915_reg.h from compat header 2026-02-25 18:11 ` Jani Nikula @ 2026-02-26 6:54 ` Shankar, Uma 2026-02-26 9:42 ` Jani Nikula 0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: Shankar, Uma @ 2026-02-26 6:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Nikula, Jani, Roper, Matthew D Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org, ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com, Vivi, Rodrigo, Thomas Hellström, Brost, Matthew > -----Original Message----- > From: Nikula, Jani <jani.nikula@intel.com> > Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2026 11:42 PM > To: Roper, Matthew D <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>; Shankar, Uma > <uma.shankar@intel.com> > Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org; > ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com; Vivi, Rodrigo <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>; Thomas > Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>; Brost, Matthew > <matthew.brost@intel.com> > Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/xe/compat: Remove unused i915_reg.h from compat > header > > On Wed, 25 Feb 2026, Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 25, 2026 at 04:40:23PM +0000, Shankar, Uma wrote: > >> Pushed to drm-xe-next. Thanks for the review. > > > > Even though this is an Xe patch it might have been better to send this > > one through drm-intel-next rather than drm-xe-next since drm-xe-next > > doesn't have the prerequisite display patches yet to make this header > > removal possible. So at the moment the build of drm-xe-next is broken. > > Not a huge issue since drm-tip is fine, and drm-xe-next will likely be > > fixed soon whenever a backmerge happens, but I figured I should point > > it out. I did compile check before merge but somehow had a config with xe build disabled (face palm ☹). Thanks Matt for pointing this out. > On the contrary, I think it is an issue that warrants a revert. > > It's a hard requirement that committers *always* build the branch they apply > patches to before pushing, no exceptions. CI doesn't guarantee that at all. > > With the build already broken, you can't do that, and more breakage can slip in > until it's fixed. > > It'll take a drm-intel-next pull request to drm-next, and then a drm-next backmerge > to drm-xe-next to fix this, and we don't generally want to rush that to hotfix build > issues like this. The build failure > *before* pushing is an indication a backmerge might be needed, and that's the > normal order of things. Thanks Jani, shall I send a revert on drm-xe-next and push through drm-intel-next instead ? Apologies for the noise on this. Regards, Uma Shankar > > BR, > Jani. > > > -- > Jani Nikula, Intel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* RE: [PATCH] drm/xe/compat: Remove unused i915_reg.h from compat header 2026-02-26 6:54 ` Shankar, Uma @ 2026-02-26 9:42 ` Jani Nikula 0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread From: Jani Nikula @ 2026-02-26 9:42 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Shankar, Uma, Roper, Matthew D Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org, ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com, Vivi, Rodrigo, Thomas Hellström, Brost, Matthew On Thu, 26 Feb 2026, "Shankar, Uma" <uma.shankar@intel.com> wrote: > Thanks Jani, shall I send a revert on drm-xe-next and push through > drm-intel-next instead ? Yes, please. > Apologies for the noise on this. No worries, it happens. BR, Jani. -- Jani Nikula, Intel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] drm/xe/compat: Remove unused i915_reg.h from compat header @ 2026-02-26 17:55 Uma Shankar 2026-02-27 6:47 ` Shankar, Uma 0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: Uma Shankar @ 2026-02-26 17:55 UTC (permalink / raw) To: intel-gfx, intel-xe; +Cc: jani.nikula, Uma Shankar Display Code is made independent of i915_reg.h, hence it can be dropped from compat header. Signed-off-by: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/xe/compat-i915-headers/i915_reg.h | 6 ------ 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/compat-i915-headers/i915_reg.h diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/compat-i915-headers/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/compat-i915-headers/i915_reg.h deleted file mode 100644 index 8619ec015ad4..000000000000 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/compat-i915-headers/i915_reg.h +++ /dev/null @@ -1,6 +0,0 @@ -/* SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT */ -/* - * Copyright © 2023 Intel Corporation - */ - -#include "../../i915/i915_reg.h" -- 2.50.1 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* RE: [PATCH] drm/xe/compat: Remove unused i915_reg.h from compat header 2026-02-26 17:55 Uma Shankar @ 2026-02-27 6:47 ` Shankar, Uma 0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread From: Shankar, Uma @ 2026-02-27 6:47 UTC (permalink / raw) To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: Nikula, Jani > -----Original Message----- > From: Shankar, Uma <uma.shankar@intel.com> > Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2026 11:26 PM > To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org > Cc: Nikula, Jani <jani.nikula@intel.com>; Shankar, Uma > <uma.shankar@intel.com> > Subject: [PATCH] drm/xe/compat: Remove unused i915_reg.h from compat > header > > Display Code is made independent of i915_reg.h, hence it can be dropped from > compat header. Fixed earlier fumble and pushed the change through drm-intel-next. Regards, Uma Shankar > Signed-off-by: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com> > Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/compat-i915-headers/i915_reg.h | 6 ------ > 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-) > delete mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/compat-i915-headers/i915_reg.h > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/compat-i915-headers/i915_reg.h > b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/compat-i915-headers/i915_reg.h > deleted file mode 100644 > index 8619ec015ad4..000000000000 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/compat-i915-headers/i915_reg.h > +++ /dev/null > @@ -1,6 +0,0 @@ > -/* SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT */ > -/* > - * Copyright © 2023 Intel Corporation > - */ > - > -#include "../../i915/i915_reg.h" > -- > 2.50.1 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-02-27 6:48 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 11+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2026-02-23 17:10 [PATCH] drm/xe/compat: Remove unused i915_reg.h from compat header Uma Shankar 2026-02-23 17:37 ` ✓ i915.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork 2026-02-24 13:07 ` [PATCH] " Jani Nikula 2026-02-24 13:25 ` Shankar, Uma 2026-02-25 16:40 ` Shankar, Uma 2026-02-25 17:43 ` Matt Roper 2026-02-25 18:11 ` Jani Nikula 2026-02-26 6:54 ` Shankar, Uma 2026-02-26 9:42 ` Jani Nikula -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below -- 2026-02-26 17:55 Uma Shankar 2026-02-27 6:47 ` Shankar, Uma
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox