From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/4] drm/i915/selftests: Break out of the lrc layout test after register mismatch
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2021 15:28:01 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0b0c4b58-7548-c35d-1f2d-124c37b70979@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <160994622709.14894.1991027418621898869@build.alporthouse.com>
On 06/01/2021 15:17, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2021-01-06 15:10:02)
>>
>> On 06/01/2021 12:39, Chris Wilson wrote:
>>> AFter detecting a register mismatch between the protocontext and the
>>> image generated by HW, immediately break out of the double loop.
>>> (Otherwise we end up a second configuing error message.)
>>
>> s/configuing/confusing/?
>>
>> No use of dumping all differences? Why it is confusing?
>
> rcs0: Different registers found at dword 2, expected 2244, found 2244
> rcs0: Expected LRI command at dword 2, found 00002244
>
> We then hexdump the entire page, both HW/SW, so we can try and figure out
> what went wrong.
Right, I see it now.
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Regards,
Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-06 15:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-06 12:39 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/4] drm/i915/selftests: Break out of the lrc layout test after register mismatch Chris Wilson
2021-01-06 12:39 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/4] drm/i915/selftests: Improve handling of iomem around stolen Chris Wilson
2021-01-06 15:12 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-01-06 12:39 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/4] drm/i915/gt: Restore ce->signal flush before releasing virtual engine Chris Wilson
2021-01-06 12:39 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/4] drm/i915/gt: Remove timeslice suppression Chris Wilson
2021-01-06 15:57 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-01-06 16:08 ` Chris Wilson
2021-01-06 16:19 ` Chris Wilson
2021-01-07 10:16 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-01-07 10:27 ` Chris Wilson
2021-01-07 12:52 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-01-06 13:01 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series starting with [1/4] drm/i915/selftests: Break out of the lrc layout test after register mismatch Patchwork
2021-01-06 13:03 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2021-01-06 13:30 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2021-01-06 15:10 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/4] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-01-06 15:17 ` Chris Wilson
2021-01-06 15:28 ` Tvrtko Ursulin [this message]
2021-01-06 16:38 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for series starting with [1/4] " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0b0c4b58-7548-c35d-1f2d-124c37b70979@linux.intel.com \
--to=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox