From: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
Subject: [PATCH] Revert "drm/i915: Calculate correct stolen size for GEN7+"
Date: Wed, 1 May 2013 11:00:34 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1367431234-8448-1-git-send-email-ben@bwidawsk.net> (raw)
This reverts commit 03752f5b7b77b95d83479885040950fba1250850.
This revert requires a bit of explanation on how I understand things
work. Internally the architects/designers decide how the stolen encoding
works. We put it in a doc. BIOS writers take these docs and implement
it. Driver writers read the doc too, and read the value left by the BIOS
writers, and then we make magic.
The failing here is that in the docs we had[1] contained two different
definitions for this register for Gen7. (We have both a PCI register,
and an MMIO, and each of these were different). At the time [2] of
03752f5, we asked the architects what the correct value should be; but
that doesn't match the reality (BIOS) unfortunately.
So on all machines I can get my hands on, this revert is the right thing
to do. I've also worked with the product group to confirm that they
agree this revert is what we should do. People using HW made my "people"
who both write their own BIOS, and have access to our docs (Apple?)
[1] The docs are still wrong on this one. Now instead of two registers with
two definitions, we have one register with BOTH definitions, progress?
[2] The open source PRMs have the "wrong" definitions in chapter Volume
1 part6, section 1.1.12.
This digging was inspired by Paulo.
Conflicts:
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c
Cc: Paulo Zanoni <przanoni@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c | 15 +--------------
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 2 --
2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c
index 37058ff2..de6e7c5 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c
@@ -743,15 +743,6 @@ static inline size_t gen6_get_stolen_size(u16 snb_gmch_ctl)
return snb_gmch_ctl << 25; /* 32 MB units */
}
-static inline size_t gen7_get_stolen_size(u16 snb_gmch_ctl)
-{
- static const int stolen_decoder[] = {
- 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 32, 48, 64, 128, 256, 96, 160, 224, 352};
- snb_gmch_ctl >>= IVB_GMCH_GMS_SHIFT;
- snb_gmch_ctl &= IVB_GMCH_GMS_MASK;
- return stolen_decoder[snb_gmch_ctl] << 20;
-}
-
static int gen6_gmch_probe(struct drm_device *dev,
size_t *gtt_total,
size_t *stolen,
@@ -781,11 +772,7 @@ static int gen6_gmch_probe(struct drm_device *dev,
pci_read_config_word(dev->pdev, SNB_GMCH_CTRL, &snb_gmch_ctl);
gtt_size = gen6_get_total_gtt_size(snb_gmch_ctl);
- if (IS_GEN7(dev) && !IS_VALLEYVIEW(dev))
- *stolen = gen7_get_stolen_size(snb_gmch_ctl);
- else
- *stolen = gen6_get_stolen_size(snb_gmch_ctl);
-
+ *stolen = gen6_get_stolen_size(snb_gmch_ctl);
*gtt_total = (gtt_size / sizeof(gen6_gtt_pte_t)) << PAGE_SHIFT;
/* For Modern GENs the PTEs and register space are split in the BAR */
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
index 95ae5cf..f2a7a8c 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
@@ -46,8 +46,6 @@
#define SNB_GMCH_GGMS_MASK 0x3
#define SNB_GMCH_GMS_SHIFT 3 /* Graphics Mode Select */
#define SNB_GMCH_GMS_MASK 0x1f
-#define IVB_GMCH_GMS_SHIFT 4
-#define IVB_GMCH_GMS_MASK 0xf
/* PCI config space */
--
1.8.2.2
next reply other threads:[~2013-05-01 17:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-01 18:00 Ben Widawsky [this message]
2013-05-01 18:03 ` [PATCH] Revert "drm/i915: Calculate correct stolen size for GEN7+" Ben Widawsky
2013-05-07 17:02 ` Daniel Vetter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1367431234-8448-1-git-send-email-ben@bwidawsk.net \
--to=ben@bwidawsk.net \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox