From: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "drm/i915: Calculate correct stolen size for GEN7+"
Date: Wed, 1 May 2013 11:03:10 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130501180310.GA8556@bwidawsk.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1367431234-8448-1-git-send-email-ben@bwidawsk.net>
On Wed, May 01, 2013 at 11:00:34AM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> This reverts commit 03752f5b7b77b95d83479885040950fba1250850.
>
> This revert requires a bit of explanation on how I understand things
> work. Internally the architects/designers decide how the stolen encoding
> works. We put it in a doc. BIOS writers take these docs and implement
> it. Driver writers read the doc too, and read the value left by the BIOS
> writers, and then we make magic.
>
> The failing here is that in the docs we had[1] contained two different
> definitions for this register for Gen7. (We have both a PCI register,
> and an MMIO, and each of these were different). At the time [2] of
> 03752f5, we asked the architects what the correct value should be; but
> that doesn't match the reality (BIOS) unfortunately.
>
> So on all machines I can get my hands on, this revert is the right thing
> to do. I've also worked with the product group to confirm that they
> agree this revert is what we should do. People using HW made my "people"
> who both write their own BIOS, and have access to our docs (Apple?)
Ooops, left this bit out... These "people" may not agree with the
revert. I don't have machines to test.
>
> [1] The docs are still wrong on this one. Now instead of two registers with
> two definitions, we have one register with BOTH definitions, progress?
> [2] The open source PRMs have the "wrong" definitions in chapter Volume
> 1 part6, section 1.1.12.
>
> This digging was inspired by Paulo.
>
> Conflicts:
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c
>
> Cc: Paulo Zanoni <przanoni@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c | 15 +--------------
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 2 --
> 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c
> index 37058ff2..de6e7c5 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c
> @@ -743,15 +743,6 @@ static inline size_t gen6_get_stolen_size(u16 snb_gmch_ctl)
> return snb_gmch_ctl << 25; /* 32 MB units */
> }
>
> -static inline size_t gen7_get_stolen_size(u16 snb_gmch_ctl)
> -{
> - static const int stolen_decoder[] = {
> - 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 32, 48, 64, 128, 256, 96, 160, 224, 352};
> - snb_gmch_ctl >>= IVB_GMCH_GMS_SHIFT;
> - snb_gmch_ctl &= IVB_GMCH_GMS_MASK;
> - return stolen_decoder[snb_gmch_ctl] << 20;
> -}
> -
> static int gen6_gmch_probe(struct drm_device *dev,
> size_t *gtt_total,
> size_t *stolen,
> @@ -781,11 +772,7 @@ static int gen6_gmch_probe(struct drm_device *dev,
> pci_read_config_word(dev->pdev, SNB_GMCH_CTRL, &snb_gmch_ctl);
> gtt_size = gen6_get_total_gtt_size(snb_gmch_ctl);
>
> - if (IS_GEN7(dev) && !IS_VALLEYVIEW(dev))
> - *stolen = gen7_get_stolen_size(snb_gmch_ctl);
> - else
> - *stolen = gen6_get_stolen_size(snb_gmch_ctl);
> -
> + *stolen = gen6_get_stolen_size(snb_gmch_ctl);
> *gtt_total = (gtt_size / sizeof(gen6_gtt_pte_t)) << PAGE_SHIFT;
>
> /* For Modern GENs the PTEs and register space are split in the BAR */
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> index 95ae5cf..f2a7a8c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> @@ -46,8 +46,6 @@
> #define SNB_GMCH_GGMS_MASK 0x3
> #define SNB_GMCH_GMS_SHIFT 3 /* Graphics Mode Select */
> #define SNB_GMCH_GMS_MASK 0x1f
> -#define IVB_GMCH_GMS_SHIFT 4
> -#define IVB_GMCH_GMS_MASK 0xf
>
>
> /* PCI config space */
> --
> 1.8.2.2
>
--
Ben Widawsky, Intel Open Source Technology Center
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-01 18:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-01 18:00 [PATCH] Revert "drm/i915: Calculate correct stolen size for GEN7+" Ben Widawsky
2013-05-01 18:03 ` Ben Widawsky [this message]
2013-05-07 17:02 ` Daniel Vetter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130501180310.GA8556@bwidawsk.net \
--to=ben@bwidawsk.net \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox