From: Paulo Zanoni <przanoni@gmail.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/7] drm/i915: remove SDV support from lpt_pch_init_refclk
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 14:19:36 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1373649582-19618-2-git-send-email-przanoni@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1373649582-19618-1-git-send-email-przanoni@gmail.com>
From: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
The machines that fall in the "is_sdv" case are some very early
pre-production steppings. This patch may break VGA output after
suspend/resume on these machines.
Even the documentation for the is_sdv cases was removed from BSpec.
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 104 ++++++++++++-----------------------
1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 70 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
index c79addd..5821ffc 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
@@ -5170,7 +5170,6 @@ static void lpt_init_pch_refclk(struct drm_device *dev)
struct drm_mode_config *mode_config = &dev->mode_config;
struct intel_encoder *encoder;
bool has_vga = false;
- bool is_sdv = false;
u32 tmp;
list_for_each_entry(encoder, &mode_config->encoder_list, base.head) {
@@ -5186,10 +5185,6 @@ static void lpt_init_pch_refclk(struct drm_device *dev)
mutex_lock(&dev_priv->dpio_lock);
- /* XXX: Rip out SDV support once Haswell ships for real. */
- if (IS_HASWELL(dev) && (dev->pci_device & 0xFF00) == 0x0C00)
- is_sdv = true;
-
tmp = intel_sbi_read(dev_priv, SBI_SSCCTL, SBI_ICLK);
tmp &= ~SBI_SSCCTL_DISABLE;
tmp |= SBI_SSCCTL_PATHALT;
@@ -5201,36 +5196,27 @@ static void lpt_init_pch_refclk(struct drm_device *dev)
tmp &= ~SBI_SSCCTL_PATHALT;
intel_sbi_write(dev_priv, SBI_SSCCTL, tmp, SBI_ICLK);
- if (!is_sdv) {
- tmp = I915_READ(SOUTH_CHICKEN2);
- tmp |= FDI_MPHY_IOSFSB_RESET_CTL;
- I915_WRITE(SOUTH_CHICKEN2, tmp);
+ tmp = I915_READ(SOUTH_CHICKEN2);
+ tmp |= FDI_MPHY_IOSFSB_RESET_CTL;
+ I915_WRITE(SOUTH_CHICKEN2, tmp);
- if (wait_for_atomic_us(I915_READ(SOUTH_CHICKEN2) &
- FDI_MPHY_IOSFSB_RESET_STATUS, 100))
- DRM_ERROR("FDI mPHY reset assert timeout\n");
+ if (wait_for_atomic_us(I915_READ(SOUTH_CHICKEN2) &
+ FDI_MPHY_IOSFSB_RESET_STATUS, 100))
+ DRM_ERROR("FDI mPHY reset assert timeout\n");
- tmp = I915_READ(SOUTH_CHICKEN2);
- tmp &= ~FDI_MPHY_IOSFSB_RESET_CTL;
- I915_WRITE(SOUTH_CHICKEN2, tmp);
+ tmp = I915_READ(SOUTH_CHICKEN2);
+ tmp &= ~FDI_MPHY_IOSFSB_RESET_CTL;
+ I915_WRITE(SOUTH_CHICKEN2, tmp);
- if (wait_for_atomic_us((I915_READ(SOUTH_CHICKEN2) &
- FDI_MPHY_IOSFSB_RESET_STATUS) == 0,
- 100))
- DRM_ERROR("FDI mPHY reset de-assert timeout\n");
- }
+ if (wait_for_atomic_us((I915_READ(SOUTH_CHICKEN2) &
+ FDI_MPHY_IOSFSB_RESET_STATUS) == 0, 100))
+ DRM_ERROR("FDI mPHY reset de-assert timeout\n");
tmp = intel_sbi_read(dev_priv, 0x8008, SBI_MPHY);
tmp &= ~(0xFF << 24);
tmp |= (0x12 << 24);
intel_sbi_write(dev_priv, 0x8008, tmp, SBI_MPHY);
- if (is_sdv) {
- tmp = intel_sbi_read(dev_priv, 0x800C, SBI_MPHY);
- tmp |= 0x7FFF;
- intel_sbi_write(dev_priv, 0x800C, tmp, SBI_MPHY);
- }
-
tmp = intel_sbi_read(dev_priv, 0x2008, SBI_MPHY);
tmp |= (1 << 11);
intel_sbi_write(dev_priv, 0x2008, tmp, SBI_MPHY);
@@ -5239,24 +5225,6 @@ static void lpt_init_pch_refclk(struct drm_device *dev)
tmp |= (1 << 11);
intel_sbi_write(dev_priv, 0x2108, tmp, SBI_MPHY);
- if (is_sdv) {
- tmp = intel_sbi_read(dev_priv, 0x2038, SBI_MPHY);
- tmp |= (0x3F << 24) | (0xF << 20) | (0xF << 16);
- intel_sbi_write(dev_priv, 0x2038, tmp, SBI_MPHY);
-
- tmp = intel_sbi_read(dev_priv, 0x2138, SBI_MPHY);
- tmp |= (0x3F << 24) | (0xF << 20) | (0xF << 16);
- intel_sbi_write(dev_priv, 0x2138, tmp, SBI_MPHY);
-
- tmp = intel_sbi_read(dev_priv, 0x203C, SBI_MPHY);
- tmp |= (0x3F << 8);
- intel_sbi_write(dev_priv, 0x203C, tmp, SBI_MPHY);
-
- tmp = intel_sbi_read(dev_priv, 0x213C, SBI_MPHY);
- tmp |= (0x3F << 8);
- intel_sbi_write(dev_priv, 0x213C, tmp, SBI_MPHY);
- }
-
tmp = intel_sbi_read(dev_priv, 0x206C, SBI_MPHY);
tmp |= (1 << 24) | (1 << 21) | (1 << 18);
intel_sbi_write(dev_priv, 0x206C, tmp, SBI_MPHY);
@@ -5265,17 +5233,15 @@ static void lpt_init_pch_refclk(struct drm_device *dev)
tmp |= (1 << 24) | (1 << 21) | (1 << 18);
intel_sbi_write(dev_priv, 0x216C, tmp, SBI_MPHY);
- if (!is_sdv) {
- tmp = intel_sbi_read(dev_priv, 0x2080, SBI_MPHY);
- tmp &= ~(7 << 13);
- tmp |= (5 << 13);
- intel_sbi_write(dev_priv, 0x2080, tmp, SBI_MPHY);
+ tmp = intel_sbi_read(dev_priv, 0x2080, SBI_MPHY);
+ tmp &= ~(7 << 13);
+ tmp |= (5 << 13);
+ intel_sbi_write(dev_priv, 0x2080, tmp, SBI_MPHY);
- tmp = intel_sbi_read(dev_priv, 0x2180, SBI_MPHY);
- tmp &= ~(7 << 13);
- tmp |= (5 << 13);
- intel_sbi_write(dev_priv, 0x2180, tmp, SBI_MPHY);
- }
+ tmp = intel_sbi_read(dev_priv, 0x2180, SBI_MPHY);
+ tmp &= ~(7 << 13);
+ tmp |= (5 << 13);
+ intel_sbi_write(dev_priv, 0x2180, tmp, SBI_MPHY);
tmp = intel_sbi_read(dev_priv, 0x208C, SBI_MPHY);
tmp &= ~0xFF;
@@ -5297,25 +5263,23 @@ static void lpt_init_pch_refclk(struct drm_device *dev)
tmp |= (0x1C << 16);
intel_sbi_write(dev_priv, 0x2198, tmp, SBI_MPHY);
- if (!is_sdv) {
- tmp = intel_sbi_read(dev_priv, 0x20C4, SBI_MPHY);
- tmp |= (1 << 27);
- intel_sbi_write(dev_priv, 0x20C4, tmp, SBI_MPHY);
+ tmp = intel_sbi_read(dev_priv, 0x20C4, SBI_MPHY);
+ tmp |= (1 << 27);
+ intel_sbi_write(dev_priv, 0x20C4, tmp, SBI_MPHY);
- tmp = intel_sbi_read(dev_priv, 0x21C4, SBI_MPHY);
- tmp |= (1 << 27);
- intel_sbi_write(dev_priv, 0x21C4, tmp, SBI_MPHY);
+ tmp = intel_sbi_read(dev_priv, 0x21C4, SBI_MPHY);
+ tmp |= (1 << 27);
+ intel_sbi_write(dev_priv, 0x21C4, tmp, SBI_MPHY);
- tmp = intel_sbi_read(dev_priv, 0x20EC, SBI_MPHY);
- tmp &= ~(0xF << 28);
- tmp |= (4 << 28);
- intel_sbi_write(dev_priv, 0x20EC, tmp, SBI_MPHY);
+ tmp = intel_sbi_read(dev_priv, 0x20EC, SBI_MPHY);
+ tmp &= ~(0xF << 28);
+ tmp |= (4 << 28);
+ intel_sbi_write(dev_priv, 0x20EC, tmp, SBI_MPHY);
- tmp = intel_sbi_read(dev_priv, 0x21EC, SBI_MPHY);
- tmp &= ~(0xF << 28);
- tmp |= (4 << 28);
- intel_sbi_write(dev_priv, 0x21EC, tmp, SBI_MPHY);
- }
+ tmp = intel_sbi_read(dev_priv, 0x21EC, SBI_MPHY);
+ tmp &= ~(0xF << 28);
+ tmp |= (4 << 28);
+ intel_sbi_write(dev_priv, 0x21EC, tmp, SBI_MPHY);
/* ULT uses SBI_GEN0, but ULT doesn't have VGA, so we don't care. */
tmp = intel_sbi_read(dev_priv, SBI_DBUFF0, SBI_ICLK);
--
1.8.1.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-12 17:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-12 17:19 [PATCH 0/7] HSW/LPT clocking code additional sequences Paulo Zanoni
2013-07-12 17:19 ` Paulo Zanoni [this message]
2013-07-13 5:11 ` [PATCH 1/7] drm/i915: remove SDV support from lpt_pch_init_refclk Ben Widawsky
2013-07-12 17:19 ` [PATCH 2/7] drm/i915: extract FDI mPHY functions from lpt_init_pch_refclk Paulo Zanoni
2013-07-18 21:51 ` Paulo Zanoni
2013-07-12 17:19 ` [PATCH 3/7] drm/i915: extract lpt_enable_clkout_dp " Paulo Zanoni
2013-07-19 6:54 ` Daniel Vetter
2013-07-12 17:19 ` [PATCH 4/7] drm/i915: extend lpt_enable_clkout_dp Paulo Zanoni
2013-07-18 22:40 ` Ben Widawsky
2013-07-19 15:04 ` Paulo Zanoni
2013-07-19 21:53 ` [PATCH 1/5] " Paulo Zanoni
2013-07-12 17:19 ` [PATCH 5/7] drm/i915: disable CLKOUT_DP when it's not needed Paulo Zanoni
2013-07-12 18:23 ` Daniel Vetter
2013-07-12 18:24 ` Paulo Zanoni
2013-07-18 22:54 ` Ben Widawsky
2013-07-19 21:54 ` [PATCH 2/5] " Paulo Zanoni
2013-07-12 17:19 ` [PATCH 6/7] drm/i915: add functions to disable and restore LCPLL Paulo Zanoni
2013-07-18 21:53 ` Paulo Zanoni
2013-07-18 23:26 ` Ben Widawsky
2013-07-18 23:33 ` Ben Widawsky
2013-07-19 16:57 ` Paulo Zanoni
2013-07-19 18:22 ` Paulo Zanoni
2013-07-19 21:56 ` [PATCH 3/5] " Paulo Zanoni
2013-07-19 21:58 ` [PATCH 5/5] drm/i915: add HAS_LP_PCH check Paulo Zanoni
2013-07-22 17:10 ` Ben Widawsky
2013-07-22 22:44 ` Paulo Zanoni
2013-07-12 17:19 ` [PATCH 7/7] drm/i915: add some assertions to hsw_disable_lcpll Paulo Zanoni
2013-07-18 23:32 ` Ben Widawsky
2013-07-19 18:42 ` Paulo Zanoni
2013-07-18 23:33 ` [PATCH 0/7] HSW/LPT clocking code additional sequences Ben Widawsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1373649582-19618-2-git-send-email-przanoni@gmail.com \
--to=przanoni@gmail.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox