From: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [RFC] drm/i915: reference count batch object on requests
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2013 15:28:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1386163724-8378-1-git-send-email-mika.kuoppala@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131203171005.GN27344@phenom.ffwll.local>
In i915_gem_reset_ring_lists we reset requests and move objects to the
inactive list. Which means if the active list is the last one to hold a
reference, the object will disappear.
Now the problem is that we do this per-ring, and not in the order that the
objects would have been retired if the gpu wouldn't have hung. E.g. if a
batch is active on both ring 1&2 but was last active on ring 1, then we'd
free it before we go ahead with cleaning up the requests for ring 2.
Fixes regression (a possible OOPS following a GPU hang) from
commit aa60c664e6df502578454621c3a9b1f087ff8d25
Author: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Date: Wed Jun 12 15:13:20 2013 +0300
drm/i915: find guilty batch buffer on ring resets
Oops:
BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 6b6b6ce3
IP: [<f86124cc>] i915_gem_obj_offset+0xc/0x60 [i915]
*pdpt = 0000000000000000 *pde = 0000000000000000
Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP
CPU: 0 PID: 21 Comm: kworker/0:1 Not tainted 3.12.0+ #1274
Hardware name: /DZ77BH-55K, BIOS BHZ7710H.86A.0070.2012.0416.2117 04/16/2012
Workqueue: events i915_error_work_func [i915]
task: f6fd8000 ti: f2e3a000 task.ti: f2e3a000
EIP: 0060:[<f86124cc>] EFLAGS: 00010282 CPU: 0
EIP is at i915_gem_obj_offset+0xc/0x60 [i915]
EAX: ea75d880 EBX: e413497c ECX: 6b6b6b6b EDX: f6069998
ESI: f6069298 EDI: e4134960 EBP: f2e3be2c ESP: f2e3be28
DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 00d8 GS: 00e0 SS: 0068
CR0: 80050033 CR2: 6b6b6ce3 CR3: 0195b000 CR4: 001407f0
Stack:
e413497c f2e3be84 f8614d23 f8671864 f867ca2c f8689a2c f8686a49 0093c000
00000000 0093cb60 ea75d880 f6718e10 00fd8000 f6068000 00004208 00004208
00000000 00000002 fffff714 f6069340 f6718e10 00000000 f6068000 f2e3beac
Call Trace:
[<f8614d23>] i915_gem_reset+0xc3/0x2a0 [i915]
[<f85f9ada>] i915_reset+0x4a/0x160 [i915]
[<f86002d1>] i915_error_work_func+0xc1/0x110 [i915]
[<c1058b62>] process_one_work+0x122/0x3e0
[<c1059aa7>] worker_thread+0xf7/0x320
[<c10599b0>] ? manage_workers.isra.18+0x290/0x290
[<c105f3f4>] kthread+0x94/0xa0
[<c157daf7>] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x1b/0x28
[<c105f360>] ? flush_kthread_worker+0xb0/0xb0
Code: 2b 5c ca c8 31 c0 83 c4 10 5b 5e 5f 5d c3 90 b8 f4 ff ff ff eb f0 89 f6 8d bc 27 00 00 00 00 55 89 e5 53 3e 8d 74 26 00 8b 48 08 <8b> 89 78 01 00 00 39 91 c0 1a 00 00 8d 99 98 19 00 00 0f 44 d3
EIP: [<f86124cc>] i915_gem_obj_offset+0xc/0x60 [i915] SS:ESP 0068:f2e3be28
CR2: 000000006b6b6ce3
v2: Better commit message and backtrace (Daniel)
Testcase: igt/gem_reset_stats/close-pending-fork
Signed-off-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 12 +++++++-----
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
index 92149bc..e677e56 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
@@ -2145,13 +2145,12 @@ int __i915_add_request(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring,
request->head = request_start;
request->tail = request_ring_position;
- /* Whilst this request exists, batch_obj will be on the
- * active_list, and so will hold the active reference. Only when this
- * request is retired will the the batch_obj be moved onto the
- * inactive_list and lose its active reference. Hence we do not need
- * to explicitly hold another reference here.
+ /* Active list has one reference but that is not enough as same
+ * batch_obj can be active on multiple rings
*/
request->batch_obj = obj;
+ if (request->batch_obj)
+ drm_gem_object_reference(&request->batch_obj->base);
/* Hold a reference to the current context so that we can inspect
* it later in case a hangcheck error event fires.
@@ -2340,6 +2339,9 @@ static void i915_gem_free_request(struct drm_i915_gem_request *request)
if (request->ctx)
i915_gem_context_unreference(request->ctx);
+ if (request->batch_obj)
+ drm_gem_object_unreference(&request->batch_obj->base);
+
kfree(request);
}
--
1.7.9.5
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-12-04 13:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-12-02 14:47 [PATCH] tests/gem_reset_stats: add close-pending-fork Mika Kuoppala
2013-12-02 15:03 ` Chris Wilson
2013-12-02 16:32 ` Mika Kuoppala
2013-12-03 17:03 ` Daniel Vetter
2013-12-04 14:39 ` Mika Kuoppala
2013-12-04 15:48 ` Daniel Vetter
2013-12-02 15:31 ` [RFC] drm/i915: reference count batch object on requests Mika Kuoppala
2013-12-03 17:10 ` Daniel Vetter
2013-12-04 11:24 ` Chris Wilson
2013-12-04 12:08 ` Daniel Vetter
2013-12-04 12:11 ` Chris Wilson
2013-12-04 13:28 ` Mika Kuoppala [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1386163724-8378-1-git-send-email-mika.kuoppala@intel.com \
--to=mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox