From: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tests/gem_reset_stats: add close-pending-fork
Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2013 18:32:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87wqjnmcwc.fsf@gaia.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131202150308.GC26672@nuc-i3427.alporthouse.com>
Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> writes:
> On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 04:47:46PM +0200, Mika Kuoppala wrote:
>> Fork and create another filedesc to wait access to already
>> hung GPU and then kill it. This triggers use after free of the
>> request->batch_obj.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
>> ---
>> +static int __test_open_any(void)
>> +{
>> + char *name;
>> + int ret, fd;
>> +
>> + ret = asprintf(&name, "/dev/dri/card%d", drm_get_card());
>> + if (ret == -1)
>> + return -1;
>> +
>> + fd = open(name, O_RDWR);
>> + free(name);
>> +
>> + return fd;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void test_close_pending_fork(void)
>> +{
>> + int pid;
>> + int fd, fd2, h;
>> +
>> + fd = drm_open_any();
>> + igt_assert(fd >= 0);
>
> [snip]
>
>> + close(fd);
>> +
>> + fd = drm_open_any();
>
> This breaks the testsuite since drm_open_any() will now return the
> closed fd. Hence your __test_open_any() above.
>
> However this does not justify kernel doing anything other than terminating
> your process with extreme prejudice.
I discussed this with Chris in IRC. There seems to be no problem
as drm_open_any doesn't cache file descriptors.
The reason i use __test_open_any is that I needed a way to bypass
testsuites exit handling.
--Mika
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-12-02 16:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-12-02 14:47 [PATCH] tests/gem_reset_stats: add close-pending-fork Mika Kuoppala
2013-12-02 15:03 ` Chris Wilson
2013-12-02 16:32 ` Mika Kuoppala [this message]
2013-12-03 17:03 ` Daniel Vetter
2013-12-04 14:39 ` Mika Kuoppala
2013-12-04 15:48 ` Daniel Vetter
2013-12-02 15:31 ` [RFC] drm/i915: reference count batch object on requests Mika Kuoppala
2013-12-03 17:10 ` Daniel Vetter
2013-12-04 11:24 ` Chris Wilson
2013-12-04 12:08 ` Daniel Vetter
2013-12-04 12:11 ` Chris Wilson
2013-12-04 13:28 ` Mika Kuoppala
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87wqjnmcwc.fsf@gaia.fi.intel.com \
--to=mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox