* [PATCH v3] drm/i915: intel_dp_link_is_valid() should only return status of link
@ 2016-08-13 1:19 Manasi Navare
2016-08-13 6:09 ` ✗ Ro.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915: intel_dp_link_is_valid() should only return status of link (rev3) Patchwork
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Manasi Navare @ 2016-08-13 1:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx; +Cc: dhinakaran.pandiyan
Intel_dp_link_is_valid() function reads the Link status registers
and returns a boolean to indicate link is valid or not.
If the link has lost lock and is not valid any more, link
training is performed outside the function else previously trained link
is retained.
This gives us flexibility of checking whether link is valid and training
it independently.
v3:
* Removed some unnecessary DEBUG prints
* Optimized the conditional checking (Dhinakaran Pandiyan)
v2:
* Changed the function name from intel_dp_check_link_status()
to intel_dp_link_is_valid() (Lukas Wunner)
* Checks for CRTC and active CRTC are moved outside the
intel_dp_link_is_valid() function (Rodrigo Vivi)
Signed-off-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 53 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
index 364db90..d234042 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
@@ -3881,36 +3881,32 @@ go_again:
return -EINVAL;
}
-static void
-intel_dp_check_link_status(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
+static bool
+intel_dp_link_is_valid(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
{
- struct intel_encoder *intel_encoder = &dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp)->base;
struct drm_device *dev = intel_dp_to_dev(intel_dp);
u8 link_status[DP_LINK_STATUS_SIZE];
WARN_ON(!drm_modeset_is_locked(&dev->mode_config.connection_mutex));
if (!intel_dp_get_link_status(intel_dp, link_status)) {
- DRM_ERROR("Failed to get link status\n");
- return;
+ DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Failed to get link status\n");
+ return false;
}
- if (!intel_encoder->base.crtc)
- return;
+ /* Check if the link is valid by reading the bits of Link status
+ * registers
+ */
+ if (!drm_dp_channel_eq_ok(link_status, intel_dp->lane_count)) {
+ DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Channel EQ or CR not ok, need to retrain\n");
+ return false;
+ }
- if (!to_intel_crtc(intel_encoder->base.crtc)->active)
- return;
+ return true;
- /* if link training is requested we should perform it always */
- if ((intel_dp->compliance_test_type == DP_TEST_LINK_TRAINING) ||
- (!drm_dp_channel_eq_ok(link_status, intel_dp->lane_count))) {
- DRM_DEBUG_KMS("%s: channel EQ not ok, retraining\n",
- intel_encoder->base.name);
- intel_dp_start_link_train(intel_dp);
- intel_dp_stop_link_train(intel_dp);
- }
}
+
/*
* According to DP spec
* 5.1.2:
@@ -3928,6 +3924,8 @@ static bool
intel_dp_short_pulse(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
{
struct drm_device *dev = intel_dp_to_dev(intel_dp);
+ struct intel_digital_port *intel_dig_port = dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp);
+ struct intel_encoder *intel_encoder = &intel_dig_port->base;
u8 sink_irq_vector = 0;
u8 old_sink_count = intel_dp->sink_count;
bool ret;
@@ -3968,8 +3966,17 @@ intel_dp_short_pulse(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("CP or sink specific irq unhandled\n");
}
+ /* Do not train the link if there is no crtc */
+ if (!intel_encoder->base.crtc ||
+ !to_intel_crtc(intel_encoder->base.crtc)->active)
+ return true;
+
drm_modeset_lock(&dev->mode_config.connection_mutex, NULL);
- intel_dp_check_link_status(intel_dp);
+ if (!intel_dp_link_is_valid(intel_dp) ||
+ intel_dp->compliance_test_type == DP_TEST_LINK_TRAINING) {
+ intel_dp_start_link_train(intel_dp);
+ intel_dp_stop_link_train(intel_dp);
+ }
drm_modeset_unlock(&dev->mode_config.connection_mutex);
return true;
@@ -4298,8 +4305,16 @@ intel_dp_long_pulse(struct intel_connector *intel_connector)
* check links status, there has been known issues of
* link loss triggerring long pulse!!!!
*/
+ /* Do not train the link if there is no crtc */
+ if (!intel_encoder->base.crtc ||
+ !to_intel_crtc(intel_encoder->base.crtc)->active)
+ goto out;
+
drm_modeset_lock(&dev->mode_config.connection_mutex, NULL);
- intel_dp_check_link_status(intel_dp);
+ if (!intel_dp_link_is_valid(intel_dp)) {
+ intel_dp_start_link_train(intel_dp);
+ intel_dp_stop_link_train(intel_dp);
+ }
drm_modeset_unlock(&dev->mode_config.connection_mutex);
goto out;
}
--
1.9.1
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread* ✗ Ro.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915: intel_dp_link_is_valid() should only return status of link (rev3)
2016-08-13 1:19 [PATCH v3] drm/i915: intel_dp_link_is_valid() should only return status of link Manasi Navare
@ 2016-08-13 6:09 ` Patchwork
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2016-08-13 6:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Navare, Manasi D; +Cc: intel-gfx
== Series Details ==
Series: drm/i915: intel_dp_link_is_valid() should only return status of link (rev3)
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/9737/
State : failure
== Summary ==
Series 9737v3 drm/i915: intel_dp_link_is_valid() should only return status of link
http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/9737/revisions/3/mbox
Test kms_cursor_legacy:
Subgroup basic-flip-vs-cursor-legacy:
fail -> PASS (ro-byt-n2820)
pass -> FAIL (ro-bdw-i5-5250u)
Subgroup basic-flip-vs-cursor-varying-size:
pass -> FAIL (ro-bdw-i5-5250u)
pass -> DMESG-FAIL (fi-skl-i7-6700k)
Test kms_pipe_crc_basic:
Subgroup suspend-read-crc-pipe-a:
dmesg-warn -> PASS (ro-bdw-i7-5600u)
dmesg-warn -> SKIP (ro-bdw-i5-5250u)
Subgroup suspend-read-crc-pipe-b:
pass -> INCOMPLETE (fi-hsw-i7-4770k)
skip -> DMESG-WARN (ro-bdw-i5-5250u)
Subgroup suspend-read-crc-pipe-c:
skip -> DMESG-WARN (ro-bdw-i5-5250u)
fi-hsw-i7-4770k total:207 pass:186 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:20
fi-kbl-qkkr total:244 pass:185 dwarn:29 dfail:0 fail:3 skip:27
fi-skl-i7-6700k total:244 pass:208 dwarn:4 dfail:2 fail:2 skip:28
fi-snb-i7-2600 total:244 pass:202 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:42
ro-bdw-i5-5250u total:240 pass:218 dwarn:3 dfail:0 fail:2 skip:17
ro-bdw-i7-5600u total:240 pass:207 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:1 skip:32
ro-bsw-n3050 total:240 pass:195 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:3 skip:42
ro-byt-n2820 total:240 pass:198 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:2 skip:40
ro-hsw-i3-4010u total:240 pass:214 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:26
ro-hsw-i7-4770r total:240 pass:185 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:55
ro-ilk1-i5-650 total:235 pass:173 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:2 skip:60
ro-ivb-i7-3770 total:240 pass:205 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:35
ro-ivb2-i7-3770 total:240 pass:209 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:31
ro-skl3-i5-6260u total:240 pass:222 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:4 skip:14
Results at /archive/results/CI_IGT_test/RO_Patchwork_1859/
3612906 drm-intel-nightly: 2016y-08m-12d-15h-08m-02s UTC integration manifest
b41a36b drm/i915: intel_dp_link_is_valid() should only return status of link
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-08-13 6:09 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-08-13 1:19 [PATCH v3] drm/i915: intel_dp_link_is_valid() should only return status of link Manasi Navare
2016-08-13 6:09 ` ✗ Ro.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915: intel_dp_link_is_valid() should only return status of link (rev3) Patchwork
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox