From: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
To: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] drm/i915/guc: Make scratch register base and count flexible
Date: Wed, 10 May 2017 13:24:47 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1494411887.6362.12.camel@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170509140818.55024-1-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
On ti, 2017-05-09 at 14:08 +0000, Michal Wajdeczko wrote:
> We are using some scratch registers in MMIO based send function.
> Make their base and count flexible in preparation of upcoming
> GuC firmware/hardware changes. While around, change cmd len
> parameter verification from WARN_ON to GEM_BUG_ON as we don't
> need this all the time.
>
> v2: call out WARN/GEM_BUG change in the commit msg (Daniele)
> v3: don't overqualify the ints (Chris)
> v4: rebase and use proper enum
>
> Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
> Suggested-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
> Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
I suppose this could've had "# v2" at the end, unless Daniele acked all
the remaining changes.
Anyway, looks good to me with the changes.
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Could use an A-b from Jani for disagree and commit stamp as he
initially objected the way of implementing this.
Regards, Joonas
--
Joonas Lahtinen
Open Source Technology Center
Intel Corporation
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-05-10 10:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-05-02 12:39 [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915/guc: Move notification code into virtual function Michal Wajdeczko
2017-05-02 12:39 ` [PATCH 2/3] drm/i915/guc: Make scratch register base and count flexible Michal Wajdeczko
2017-05-02 16:54 ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2017-05-02 12:39 ` [PATCH 3/3] HAX Enable GuC loading & submission Michal Wajdeczko
2017-05-02 13:54 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [1/3] drm/i915/guc: Move notification code into virtual function Patchwork
2017-05-02 16:37 ` [PATCH 1/3] " Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2017-05-02 21:33 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2017-05-04 12:48 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] drm/i915/guc: Make scratch register base and count flexible Michal Wajdeczko
2017-05-04 13:22 ` Jani Nikula
2017-05-04 16:26 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2017-05-04 20:52 ` Chris Wilson
2017-05-05 6:08 ` Jani Nikula
2017-05-05 11:35 ` [PATCH v3 " Michal Wajdeczko
2017-05-08 11:31 ` Joonas Lahtinen
2017-05-08 12:07 ` Jani Nikula
2017-05-09 14:08 ` [PATCH v4 " Michal Wajdeczko
2017-05-10 10:24 ` Joonas Lahtinen [this message]
2017-05-10 10:32 ` Jani Nikula
2017-05-10 11:45 ` Joonas Lahtinen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1494411887.6362.12.camel@linux.intel.com \
--to=joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=michal.wajdeczko@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox