From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] drm/i915/guc: Make scratch register base and count flexible
Date: Thu, 04 May 2017 16:22:15 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <874lx0pxiw.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170504124813.47776-1-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
On Thu, 04 May 2017, Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com> wrote:
> We are using some scratch registers in MMIO based send function.
> Make their base and count flexible in preparation of upcoming
> GuC firmware/hardware changes. While around, change cmd len
> parameter verification from WARN_ON to GEM_BUG_ON as we don't
> need this all the time.
I'm not generally fond of caching the registers like this or adding
_MMIO() wrapping outside of i915_reg.h. Sure, we have some of that here
and there, but here it's hard to see the rationale because you do this
in preparation for something that we you're not sharing.
BR,
Jani.
>
> v2: call out WARN/GEM_BUG change in the commit msg (Daniele)
>
> Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
> Suggested-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
> Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.h | 7 +++++++
> 2 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.c
> index 72f49e6..9d11c42 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.c
> @@ -260,9 +260,36 @@ void intel_uc_fini_fw(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> __intel_uc_fw_fini(&dev_priv->huc.fw);
> }
>
> +static inline i915_reg_t guc_send_reg(struct intel_guc *guc, u32 i)
> +{
> + GEM_BUG_ON(!guc->send_regs.base);
> + GEM_BUG_ON(!guc->send_regs.count);
> + GEM_BUG_ON(i >= guc->send_regs.count);
> +
> + return _MMIO(guc->send_regs.base + 4 * i);
> +}
> +
> +static void guc_init_send_regs(struct intel_guc *guc)
> +{
> + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = guc_to_i915(guc);
> + enum forcewake_domains fw_domains = 0;
> + u32 i;
> +
> + guc->send_regs.base = i915_mmio_reg_offset(SOFT_SCRATCH(0));
> + guc->send_regs.count = SOFT_SCRATCH_COUNT - 1;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < guc->send_regs.count; i++) {
> + fw_domains |= intel_uncore_forcewake_for_reg(dev_priv,
> + guc_send_reg(guc, i),
> + FW_REG_READ | FW_REG_WRITE);
> + }
> + guc->send_regs.fw_domains = fw_domains;
> +}
> +
> static int guc_enable_communication(struct intel_guc *guc)
> {
> /* XXX: placeholder for alternate setup */
> + guc_init_send_regs(guc);
> guc->send = intel_guc_send_mmio;
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -407,19 +434,19 @@ int intel_guc_send_mmio(struct intel_guc *guc, const u32 *action, u32 len)
> int i;
> int ret;
>
> - if (WARN_ON(len < 1 || len > 15))
> - return -EINVAL;
> + GEM_BUG_ON(!len);
> + GEM_BUG_ON(len > guc->send_regs.count);
>
> mutex_lock(&guc->send_mutex);
> - intel_uncore_forcewake_get(dev_priv, FORCEWAKE_BLITTER);
> + intel_uncore_forcewake_get(dev_priv, guc->send_regs.fw_domains);
>
> dev_priv->guc.action_count += 1;
> dev_priv->guc.action_cmd = action[0];
>
> for (i = 0; i < len; i++)
> - I915_WRITE(SOFT_SCRATCH(i), action[i]);
> + I915_WRITE(guc_send_reg(guc, i), action[i]);
>
> - POSTING_READ(SOFT_SCRATCH(i - 1));
> + POSTING_READ(guc_send_reg(guc, i - 1));
>
> intel_guc_notify(guc);
>
> @@ -428,7 +455,7 @@ int intel_guc_send_mmio(struct intel_guc *guc, const u32 *action, u32 len)
> * Fast commands should still complete in 10us.
> */
> ret = __intel_wait_for_register_fw(dev_priv,
> - SOFT_SCRATCH(0),
> + guc_send_reg(guc, 0),
> INTEL_GUC_RECV_MASK,
> INTEL_GUC_RECV_MASK,
> 10, 10, &status);
> @@ -450,7 +477,7 @@ int intel_guc_send_mmio(struct intel_guc *guc, const u32 *action, u32 len)
> }
> dev_priv->guc.action_status = status;
>
> - intel_uncore_forcewake_put(dev_priv, FORCEWAKE_BLITTER);
> + intel_uncore_forcewake_put(dev_priv, guc->send_regs.fw_domains);
> mutex_unlock(&guc->send_mutex);
>
> return ret;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.h
> index 097289b..a37a8cc 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.h
> @@ -205,6 +205,13 @@ struct intel_guc {
> uint64_t submissions[I915_NUM_ENGINES];
> uint32_t last_seqno[I915_NUM_ENGINES];
>
> + /* GuC's FW specific registers used in MMIO send */
> + struct {
> + u32 base;
> + u32 count;
> + u32 fw_domains; /* enum forcewake_domains */
> + } send_regs;
> +
> /* To serialize the intel_guc_send actions */
> struct mutex send_mutex;
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-05-04 13:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-05-02 12:39 [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915/guc: Move notification code into virtual function Michal Wajdeczko
2017-05-02 12:39 ` [PATCH 2/3] drm/i915/guc: Make scratch register base and count flexible Michal Wajdeczko
2017-05-02 16:54 ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2017-05-02 12:39 ` [PATCH 3/3] HAX Enable GuC loading & submission Michal Wajdeczko
2017-05-02 13:54 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [1/3] drm/i915/guc: Move notification code into virtual function Patchwork
2017-05-02 16:37 ` [PATCH 1/3] " Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2017-05-02 21:33 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2017-05-04 12:48 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] drm/i915/guc: Make scratch register base and count flexible Michal Wajdeczko
2017-05-04 13:22 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2017-05-04 16:26 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2017-05-04 20:52 ` Chris Wilson
2017-05-05 6:08 ` Jani Nikula
2017-05-05 11:35 ` [PATCH v3 " Michal Wajdeczko
2017-05-08 11:31 ` Joonas Lahtinen
2017-05-08 12:07 ` Jani Nikula
2017-05-09 14:08 ` [PATCH v4 " Michal Wajdeczko
2017-05-10 10:24 ` Joonas Lahtinen
2017-05-10 10:32 ` Jani Nikula
2017-05-10 11:45 ` Joonas Lahtinen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=874lx0pxiw.fsf@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=michal.wajdeczko@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox