Intel-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Fixes that failed to cleanly apply to v4.15-rc1
@ 2017-11-28  8:54 Joonas Lahtinen
  2017-11-28  9:27 ` Zhenyu Wang
                   ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Joonas Lahtinen @ 2017-11-28  8:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: intel-gfx, intel-gvt-dev; +Cc: fred gao, Rodrigo Vivi

Hello,

TL;DR Reply with backported patches for v4.15-rc1 latest TODAY

Dear patch authors/Cc:s, the following patches failed to cleanly
backport to v4.15-rc1, if you believe they still are valid patches to
be included in drm-intel-fixes, please backport them and send them as a
REPLY TO THIS EMAIL before the END OF TODAY.

The patches that failed to cherry-pick:
8cf80a2e4b31 ("drm/i915/gvt: Rename reserved ring buffer")
f2880e04f3a5 ("drm/i915/gvt: Move request alloc to dispatch_workload path only")
0cfecb7c4b9b ("Revert "drm/i915: Display WA #1133 WaFbcSkipSegments:cnl, glk"")

Regards, Joonas
-- 
Joonas Lahtinen
Open Source Technology Center
Intel Corporation
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: Fixes that failed to cleanly apply to v4.15-rc1
  2017-11-28  8:54 Fixes that failed to cleanly apply to v4.15-rc1 Joonas Lahtinen
@ 2017-11-28  9:27 ` Zhenyu Wang
  2017-12-05 15:02 ` Joonas Lahtinen
  2018-01-02 11:53 ` Jani Nikula
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Zhenyu Wang @ 2017-11-28  9:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Joonas Lahtinen; +Cc: fred gao, intel-gfx, Rodrigo Vivi, intel-gvt-dev


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 846 bytes --]

On 2017.11.28 10:54:27 +0200, Joonas Lahtinen wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> TL;DR Reply with backported patches for v4.15-rc1 latest TODAY
> 
> Dear patch authors/Cc:s, the following patches failed to cleanly
> backport to v4.15-rc1, if you believe they still are valid patches to
> be included in drm-intel-fixes, please backport them and send them as a
> REPLY TO THIS EMAIL before the END OF TODAY.
> 
> The patches that failed to cherry-pick:
> 8cf80a2e4b31 ("drm/i915/gvt: Rename reserved ring buffer")

ignore this one.

> f2880e04f3a5 ("drm/i915/gvt: Move request alloc to dispatch_workload path only")

Done in last gvt-fixes pull request, but seems that missed 4.15-rc1,
so will send new pull to include this.

thanks

-- 
Open Source Technology Center, Intel ltd.

$gpg --keyserver wwwkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 4D781827

[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 195 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 160 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: Fixes that failed to cleanly apply to v4.15-rc1
  2017-11-28  8:54 Fixes that failed to cleanly apply to v4.15-rc1 Joonas Lahtinen
  2017-11-28  9:27 ` Zhenyu Wang
@ 2017-12-05 15:02 ` Joonas Lahtinen
  2017-12-06  3:24   ` Zhenyu Wang
  2018-01-02 11:53 ` Jani Nikula
  2 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Joonas Lahtinen @ 2017-12-05 15:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: intel-gfx, intel-gvt-dev, Rodrigo Vivi, Radhakrishna Sripada

Dropping GVT folks that are not affected.

Keeping Zhenyu and Zhi as a heads-up, there's no need for GVT pull for this rc?

On Tue, 2017-11-28 at 10:54 +0200, Joonas Lahtinen wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> TL;DR Reply with backported patches for v4.15-rc1 latest TODAY
> 
> Dear patch authors/Cc:s, the following patches failed to cleanly
> backport to v4.15-rc1, if you believe they still are valid patches to
> be included in drm-intel-fixes, please backport them and send them as a
> REPLY TO THIS EMAIL before the END OF TODAY.

<SNIP>

> 0cfecb7c4b9b ("Revert "drm/i915: Display WA #1133 WaFbcSkipSegments:cnl, glk"")

This patch still fails to apply and I'm looking at -rc3 already.

Rodrigo and Radhakrishna, do we actually want to see the patch
backported?

Regards, Joonas
-- 
Joonas Lahtinen
Open Source Technology Center
Intel Corporation
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: Fixes that failed to cleanly apply to v4.15-rc1
  2017-12-05 15:02 ` Joonas Lahtinen
@ 2017-12-06  3:24   ` Zhenyu Wang
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Zhenyu Wang @ 2017-12-06  3:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Joonas Lahtinen; +Cc: intel-gfx, intel-gvt-dev, Rodrigo Vivi


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 412 bytes --]

On 2017.12.05 17:02:34 +0200, Joonas Lahtinen wrote:
> Dropping GVT folks that are not affected.
> 
> Keeping Zhenyu and Zhi as a heads-up, there's no need for GVT pull for this rc?
>

I need to backport one from -next once it's pulled and it's done now.
I will send a fixes pull today.

thanks

-- 
Open Source Technology Center, Intel ltd.

$gpg --keyserver wwwkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 4D781827

[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 195 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 160 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: Fixes that failed to cleanly apply to v4.15-rc1
  2017-11-28  8:54 Fixes that failed to cleanly apply to v4.15-rc1 Joonas Lahtinen
  2017-11-28  9:27 ` Zhenyu Wang
  2017-12-05 15:02 ` Joonas Lahtinen
@ 2018-01-02 11:53 ` Jani Nikula
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jani Nikula @ 2018-01-02 11:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Joonas Lahtinen, intel-gfx, intel-gvt-dev; +Cc: Lucas De Marchi, Rodrigo Vivi

On Tue, 28 Nov 2017, Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> TL;DR Reply with backported patches for v4.15-rc1 latest TODAY
>
> Dear patch authors/Cc:s, the following patches failed to cleanly
> backport to v4.15-rc1, if you believe they still are valid patches to
> be included in drm-intel-fixes, please backport them and send them as a
> REPLY TO THIS EMAIL before the END OF TODAY.
>
> The patches that failed to cherry-pick:
> 8cf80a2e4b31 ("drm/i915/gvt: Rename reserved ring buffer")
> f2880e04f3a5 ("drm/i915/gvt: Move request alloc to dispatch_workload path only")
> 0cfecb7c4b9b ("Revert "drm/i915: Display WA #1133 WaFbcSkipSegments:cnl, glk"")

Update for -rc6

f745e9cc7e40 ("drm/i915/gvt: Add missing breaks in switch statement")
4e889d62b89d ("drm/i915/gvt: Fix pipe A enable as default for vgpu")
53421c2fe99c ("drm/i915: Apply Display WA #1183 on skl, kbl, and cfl")

BR,
Jani.

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2018-01-02 11:53 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-11-28  8:54 Fixes that failed to cleanly apply to v4.15-rc1 Joonas Lahtinen
2017-11-28  9:27 ` Zhenyu Wang
2017-12-05 15:02 ` Joonas Lahtinen
2017-12-06  3:24   ` Zhenyu Wang
2018-01-02 11:53 ` Jani Nikula

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox