From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
To: Keith Packard <keithp@keithp.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
intel-gfx <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
Eugeni Dodonov <eugeni.dodonov@intel.com>,
stable@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: paper over missed irq issues with force wake vodoo
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 10:59:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120111095920.GA3855@phenom.ffwll.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <861ur6alwb.fsf@sumi.keithp.com>
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 08:44:20PM -0800, Keith Packard wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 16:51:08 -0800, Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net> wrote:
>
> > So they've gone out of their way to build broken stuff. Awesome.
>
> Well, in theory, the interrupt would be generated *before* the hardware
> goes to RC6; when idle, I'm not exactly sure what the hardware would be
> doing to generate interrupts.
I agree, we still have no explanation for why the hw seems to forget to
push out the irq/seqno write before going into sleep (and then seems to
drop the irq right on the floor).
I suspect that the windows driver just grabs frocewake every time it's
interested in an interrupt and hence this irq/seqno signalling part
without forcewake wasn't ever properly validated. After all there must be
a reason for the multi-threaded forcewake stuff on windows - on Linux
(before the voodoo patch at least) we don't use forcewake at all in any
fastpath ...
Unfortunately round-trip times with vpg are a disaster and we're not
allowed to look at the windows kernel driver code to check ourselves :(
I need to again work on getting some access to it.
> > I'd say you've found the clue here -- I'm a lot happier with going with
> > your patches now (and I was pretty happy with the gen7 side before).
> > I'd just like to not mess with gen6 unless we've got missed irq bugs
> > there to fix.
>
> Yeah, knowing that there might be interrupt funnies due to RC6 goes some
> way to explaining why just avoiding RC6 helps.
>
> I wonder if any of this might explain the RC6 issues we see on SNB on
> some hardware, and whether we should give this a try... I know, grasping
> at straws, but still, it's about all we have at this point.
I'm already playing around with patches that grab forcewake a bit more to
work out a magic trick for semaphores vs. vt-d. Utter fail atm, everything
I try seems to blow up faster :( So we still have an elephant somewhere.
-Daniel
--
Daniel Vetter
Mail: daniel@ffwll.ch
Mobile: +41 (0)79 365 57 48
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-01-11 9:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-04 16:52 [PATCH] drm/i915: paper over missed irq issues with force wake vodoo Daniel Vetter
2012-01-04 18:15 ` Eugeni Dodonov
2012-01-04 18:40 ` Daniel Vetter
2012-01-05 2:27 ` Keith Packard
2012-01-05 11:13 ` Daniel Vetter
2012-01-05 11:23 ` Eugeni Dodonov
2012-01-05 22:11 ` [PATCH] drm/i915: rip out the HWSTAM missed irq workaround Daniel Vetter
2012-01-05 23:29 ` Ben Widawsky
2012-01-06 16:03 ` Eugeni Dodonov
2012-01-09 22:00 ` Keith Packard
2012-01-09 23:39 ` Daniel Vetter
2012-01-10 2:09 ` Keith Packard
2012-01-10 7:58 ` Daniel Vetter
2012-01-18 0:24 ` Ben Widawsky
2012-01-10 12:20 ` [PATCH] drm/i915: paper over missed irq issues with force wake vodoo Daniel Vetter
2012-01-11 0:51 ` Eric Anholt
2012-01-11 4:44 ` Keith Packard
2012-01-11 6:21 ` Ben Widawsky
2012-01-11 9:59 ` Daniel Vetter [this message]
2012-01-11 5:41 ` Kenneth Graunke
2012-01-13 16:42 ` Keith Packard
2012-01-13 23:52 ` Daniel Vetter
2012-01-13 23:55 ` Daniel Vetter
2012-01-14 0:11 ` Keith Packard
2012-01-14 0:31 ` Daniel Vetter
2012-01-14 0:50 ` Keith Packard
2012-01-14 12:12 ` Daniel Vetter
2012-01-15 6:35 ` Keith Packard
2012-01-15 15:03 ` Daniel Vetter
2012-01-16 0:06 ` Keith Packard
2012-01-05 23:29 ` Ben Widawsky
2012-01-08 13:01 ` Daniel Vetter
2012-01-09 5:09 ` Keith Packard
2012-01-06 20:56 ` Keith Packard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120111095920.GA3855@phenom.ffwll.local \
--to=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--cc=eugeni.dodonov@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=keithp@keithp.com \
--cc=stable@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox