Intel-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
To: Paulo Zanoni <przanoni@gmail.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH-v2 0/3] drm/i915: interlaced mode support
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2012 12:55:15 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120118125515.0fd244b1@jbarnes-desktop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+gsUGSL4sHUFNo5jgwtQc+A1R4K3E7XQX-67jXQEzCNWpKUow@mail.gmail.com>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1092 bytes --]

On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 18:39:40 -0200
Paulo Zanoni <przanoni@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi
> 
> 2012/1/18 Peter Ross <pross@xvid.org>:
> > This patch set enables enables interlaced mode output on
> > generation 3 and above chipsets.
> 
> I just tested that on HDMI.
> 
> The "interlace_allowed=1" patch seems fine: it made xrandr list more
> modes. But I believe patch 1 is still not correct. I tested that and
> instead of getting a 1920x1080 I got a 1920x1078 mode: vtotal, vblank
> and vsync were wrong. If you look at the patch, you'll see that the
> code has some "something -= 1" statements. I believe they could be
> wrong.
> 
> So I removed these lines and tested again... Now the mode is actually
> 1920x1080, but my monitor's OSD displays it as "1080p". So I also
> tested my TV and it reported "1080p@25hz" too.
> 
> I guess we're still missing something... I'll try to debug.

Yeah for the interlaced case the -1 should be after the multiply, if
it's there at all...  would have to double check the docs.

-- 
Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center

[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 159 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2012-01-18 20:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-01-18 13:29 [PATCH-v2 0/3] drm/i915: interlaced mode support Peter Ross
2012-01-18 13:30 ` [PATCH-v2 1/3] drm/i915: specify vertical timings in frame units for interlaced modes (gen3+) Peter Ross
2012-01-18 13:30 ` [PATCH-v2 2/3] drm/i915: allow interlaced mode output on the SDVO connector Peter Ross
2012-01-18 13:30 ` [PATCH-v2 3/3] drm/i915: allow interlaced mode output on the HDMI connector Peter Ross
2012-01-18 16:42 ` [PATCH-v2 0/3] drm/i915: interlaced mode support Jesse Barnes
2012-01-19  9:51   ` Sun, Yi
2012-01-19 10:28     ` Daniel Vetter
2012-01-18 17:27 ` Eugeni Dodonov
2012-01-18 20:39 ` Paulo Zanoni
2012-01-18 20:55   ` Jesse Barnes [this message]
2012-01-20 11:24     ` Peter Ross
2012-01-22  7:14       ` Peter Ross
2012-01-22  9:38         ` Peter Ross
2012-01-19 10:29   ` Daniel Vetter
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-01-19 11:38 Peter Ross
2012-01-19 12:23 ` Paulo Zanoni

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120118125515.0fd244b1@jbarnes-desktop \
    --to=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=przanoni@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox