Intel-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
	Intel Graphics Development <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: fix up locking inconsistency around gem_do_init
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 14:45:17 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120126134517.GJ3896@phenom.ffwll.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c55c5d$1pdepe@AZSMGA002.ch.intel.com>

On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 01:42:02PM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Jan 2012 11:41:11 +0100, Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> wrote:
> > The locking in our setup and teardown paths is rather arbitrary, but
> > generally we try to protect gem stuff with dev->struct_mutex. Further,
> > the ums/gem ioctl to setup gem _does_ take the look. So fix up this
> > benign inconsistency.
> 
> It is completely arbitrary and only exists to keep lockdep and various
> BUG_ON(mutex_lock) happy. From your reading, we would have a lockdep
> warning with ums/gem?
> 
> The extra little step towards consistency is likely to save a warning
> later, so
> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>

Actually no lockdep splat to be expected, because gem_do_init is _really_
simple. But maybe we'll extend the gtt_clear stuff in there to be more
involved and this could indeed change. But currently the only reason for
that change is to satisfy my ocd ;-)
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Mail: daniel@ffwll.ch
Mobile: +41 (0)79 365 57 48

  reply	other threads:[~2012-01-26 13:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-01-26 10:41 [PATCH] drm/i915: fix up locking inconsistency around gem_do_init Daniel Vetter
2012-01-26 13:42 ` Chris Wilson
2012-01-26 13:45   ` Daniel Vetter [this message]
2012-02-13 19:05   ` Daniel Vetter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120126134517.GJ3896@phenom.ffwll.local \
    --to=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
    --cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox