From: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Intel Graphics Development <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/14] drm/i915: don't set up gem ring functions on gen5 for !kms
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 18:05:14 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120412180514.5aefd151@bwidawsk.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1334175179-1514-14-git-send-email-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
On Wed, 11 Apr 2012 22:12:58 +0200
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> wrote:
> We already disallow initialition of gem in this case in the
> corresponding ioctl, so don't bother setting up the gem support ring
> functions in the legacy dri render ring init.
>
> Signed-Off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c | 24 ++++++++++--------------
> 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
> index 111981a..108bfd6 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
> @@ -1336,21 +1336,17 @@ int intel_render_ring_init_dri(struct drm_device *dev, u64 start, u32 size)
> if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 6) {
> /* non-kms not supported on gen6+ */
> return -ENODEV;
> - } else if (IS_GEN5(dev)) {
> - ring->add_request = pc_render_add_request;
> - ring->flush = render_ring_flush;
> - ring->get_seqno = pc_render_get_seqno;
> - ring->irq_get = gen5_ring_get_irq;
> - ring->irq_put = gen5_ring_put_irq;
> - ring->irq_enable_mask = GT_USER_INTERRUPT | GT_PIPE_NOTIFY;
> - } else {
> - ring->add_request = i9xx_add_request;
> - ring->flush = render_ring_flush;
> - ring->get_seqno = ring_get_seqno;
> - ring->irq_get = i9xx_ring_get_irq;
> - ring->irq_put = i9xx_ring_put_irq;
> - ring->irq_enable_mask = I915_USER_INTERRUPT;
> }
> +
> + /* Note: gem is not supported on gen5/ilk without kms (the corresponding
> + * gem_init ioctl returns with -ENODEV). Hence we do not need to set up
> + * the special gen5 functions. */
Can we make the check >= 5 above? I think doing so would remove the need
for this comment.
> + ring->add_request = i9xx_add_request;
> + ring->flush = render_ring_flush;
> + ring->get_seqno = ring_get_seqno;
> + ring->irq_get = i9xx_ring_get_irq;
> + ring->irq_put = i9xx_ring_put_irq;
> + ring->irq_enable_mask = I915_USER_INTERRUPT;
> ring->write_tail = ring_write_tail;
> if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 4)
> ring->dispatch_execbuffer = i965_dispatch_execbuffer;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-13 1:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-11 20:12 [PATCH 00/14] intel_ringbuffer.c reorg + cleanups Daniel Vetter
2012-04-11 20:12 ` [PATCH 01/14] drm/i915: rip out ring->irq_mask Daniel Vetter
2012-04-11 20:12 ` [PATCH 02/14] drm/i915: set ring->size in common ring setup code Daniel Vetter
2012-04-12 19:23 ` Ben Widawsky
2012-04-12 20:17 ` Daniel Vetter
2012-04-11 20:12 ` [PATCH 03/14] drm/i915: dynamically set up the render ring functions and params Daniel Vetter
2012-04-11 20:12 ` [PATCH 04/14] drm/i915: dynamically set up bsd " Daniel Vetter
2012-04-11 20:12 ` [PATCH 05/14] drm/i915: dynamically set up blt ring functions and parameters Daniel Vetter
2012-04-11 20:12 ` [PATCH 06/14] drm/i915: don't set up rings on gen6+ for non-kms Daniel Vetter
2012-04-11 20:12 ` [PATCH 07/14] drm/i915: consolidate ring->sync-to functions Daniel Vetter
2012-04-11 20:12 ` [PATCH 08/14] drm/i915: abstract away ring-specific irq_get/put Daniel Vetter
2012-04-11 20:12 ` [PATCH 09/14] drm/i915: split out the gen5 ring irq get/put functions Daniel Vetter
2012-04-11 20:12 ` [PATCH 10/14] drm/i915: don't enable the gen6 bsd ring tail write enable on gen7 Daniel Vetter
2012-04-11 20:12 ` [PATCH 11/14] drm/i915: split up ring->dispatch_execbuffer functions Daniel Vetter
2012-04-11 20:12 ` [PATCH 12/14] drm/i915: consolidate ring->flush a bit Daniel Vetter
2012-04-13 0:54 ` Ben Widawsky
2012-04-13 9:03 ` Daniel Vetter
2012-04-11 20:12 ` [PATCH 13/14] drm/i915: don't set up gem ring functions on gen5 for !kms Daniel Vetter
2012-04-13 1:05 ` Ben Widawsky [this message]
2012-04-13 9:07 ` Daniel Vetter
2012-04-11 20:12 ` [PATCH 14/14] drm/i915: inline enable/disable_irq into ring->get/put_irq Daniel Vetter
2012-04-13 1:03 ` Ben Widawsky
2012-04-13 9:13 ` Daniel Vetter
2012-04-13 9:17 ` Chris Wilson
2012-04-11 20:49 ` [PATCH 00/14] intel_ringbuffer.c reorg + cleanups Chris Wilson
2012-04-11 23:42 ` Eric Anholt
2012-04-13 10:56 ` Daniel Vetter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120412180514.5aefd151@bwidawsk.net \
--to=ben@bwidawsk.net \
--cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox