From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
To: Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
Intel Graphics Development <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/14] intel_ringbuffer.c reorg + cleanups
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 12:56:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120413105644.GE4525@phenom.ffwll.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87aa2hkf8q.fsf@eliezer.anholt.net>
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 04:42:13PM -0700, Eric Anholt wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Apr 2012 22:12:45 +0200, Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > This patch series is inspired by Ben's ring->get|put_irq cleanup for gen6+ and
> > my perpetual hatred for intel_ringbuffer.c.
> >
> > It's a lot of churn, but the end result is imho worth it - I almost started to
> > like what the ringbuffer abstraction looks like now. There are some follow-up
> > cleanups possible, but I think that can wait until we've cleanup up our domain
> > tracking and ripped out the flushing_list (if that ever happens).
> >
> > Commments, flames and review highly welcome.
>
> This is so nice. It's way better than the series I started with when
> working on domain tracking lobotomy.
tbh it's far from my first attempt at this, and I've dodged the domain
tracking things mostly by leaving the ring->flush code as-is.
> Except for a s/bds/bsd/ in patch 4's commit message,
Fixed, same for the s/ring->flush/ring->add_request/ noticed by Ben.
> Reviewed-by: Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>
Thanks for the review, all queued for -next. Imo Ben's concerns are valid,
but better tackled in follow up patches.
-Daniel
--
Daniel Vetter
Mail: daniel@ffwll.ch
Mobile: +41 (0)79 365 57 48
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-13 10:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-11 20:12 [PATCH 00/14] intel_ringbuffer.c reorg + cleanups Daniel Vetter
2012-04-11 20:12 ` [PATCH 01/14] drm/i915: rip out ring->irq_mask Daniel Vetter
2012-04-11 20:12 ` [PATCH 02/14] drm/i915: set ring->size in common ring setup code Daniel Vetter
2012-04-12 19:23 ` Ben Widawsky
2012-04-12 20:17 ` Daniel Vetter
2012-04-11 20:12 ` [PATCH 03/14] drm/i915: dynamically set up the render ring functions and params Daniel Vetter
2012-04-11 20:12 ` [PATCH 04/14] drm/i915: dynamically set up bsd " Daniel Vetter
2012-04-11 20:12 ` [PATCH 05/14] drm/i915: dynamically set up blt ring functions and parameters Daniel Vetter
2012-04-11 20:12 ` [PATCH 06/14] drm/i915: don't set up rings on gen6+ for non-kms Daniel Vetter
2012-04-11 20:12 ` [PATCH 07/14] drm/i915: consolidate ring->sync-to functions Daniel Vetter
2012-04-11 20:12 ` [PATCH 08/14] drm/i915: abstract away ring-specific irq_get/put Daniel Vetter
2012-04-11 20:12 ` [PATCH 09/14] drm/i915: split out the gen5 ring irq get/put functions Daniel Vetter
2012-04-11 20:12 ` [PATCH 10/14] drm/i915: don't enable the gen6 bsd ring tail write enable on gen7 Daniel Vetter
2012-04-11 20:12 ` [PATCH 11/14] drm/i915: split up ring->dispatch_execbuffer functions Daniel Vetter
2012-04-11 20:12 ` [PATCH 12/14] drm/i915: consolidate ring->flush a bit Daniel Vetter
2012-04-13 0:54 ` Ben Widawsky
2012-04-13 9:03 ` Daniel Vetter
2012-04-11 20:12 ` [PATCH 13/14] drm/i915: don't set up gem ring functions on gen5 for !kms Daniel Vetter
2012-04-13 1:05 ` Ben Widawsky
2012-04-13 9:07 ` Daniel Vetter
2012-04-11 20:12 ` [PATCH 14/14] drm/i915: inline enable/disable_irq into ring->get/put_irq Daniel Vetter
2012-04-13 1:03 ` Ben Widawsky
2012-04-13 9:13 ` Daniel Vetter
2012-04-13 9:17 ` Chris Wilson
2012-04-11 20:49 ` [PATCH 00/14] intel_ringbuffer.c reorg + cleanups Chris Wilson
2012-04-11 23:42 ` Eric Anholt
2012-04-13 10:56 ` Daniel Vetter [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120413105644.GE4525@phenom.ffwll.local \
--to=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--cc=eric@anholt.net \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox