From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
To: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/6] drm/i915: Handle framebuffer offsets[]
Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 21:01:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120524190124.GG5078@phenom.ffwll.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120524184915.GL13065@intel.com>
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 09:49:15PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 11:31:32AM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > On Thu, 24 May 2012 21:08:58 +0300
> > ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com wrote:
> >
> > > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> > >
> > > Take fb->offset[0] into account when calculating the linear and tile x/y
> > > offsets.
> > >
> > > For non-tiled surfaces fb->offset[0] is simply added to the linear
> > > byte offset.
> > >
> > > For tiled surfaces treat fb->offsets[0] as a byte offset into the
> > > linearized view of the surface. So we end up converting fb->offsets[0]
> > > into additional x and y offsets.
> >
> > Do you have code using a non-zero offsets[0]? At least for current
> > code that would indicate some kind of problem... though hopefully we'll
> > be adding planar support back again sometime soon.
>
> I did have some test app that used offsets[] at some point, but tbh I
> didn't excercise these changes with it.
>
> I have a sort of semi working skeleton of a test app which I just modify
> for various use cases as need arises. I really should try to clean it up
> a bit and generalize it so that it wouldn't need constant code changes
> to test different scenarios.
Yeah, I want these little test apps as testcases in i-g-t.
-Daniel
--
Daniel Vetter
Mail: daniel@ffwll.ch
Mobile: +41 (0)79 365 57 48
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-24 19:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-24 18:08 [PATCH 0/6] drm/i915: Framebuffer layout fixes and sanity checks ville.syrjala
2012-05-24 18:08 ` [PATCH 1/6] drm/i915: Fix display pixel format handling ville.syrjala
2012-05-24 18:08 ` [PATCH 2/6] drm/i915: Check framebuffer stride more thoroughly ville.syrjala
2012-07-05 11:27 ` Daniel Vetter
2012-07-05 11:59 ` [Intel-gfx] " Ville Syrjälä
2012-05-24 18:08 ` [PATCH 3/6] drm/i915: Zero initialize mode_cmd ville.syrjala
2012-07-05 11:28 ` Daniel Vetter
2012-05-24 18:08 ` [PATCH 4/6] drm/i915: Check the framebuffer offset ville.syrjala
2012-05-24 18:08 ` [PATCH 5/6] drm/i915: Handle framebuffer offsets[] ville.syrjala
2012-05-24 18:31 ` Jesse Barnes
2012-05-24 18:49 ` Ville Syrjälä
2012-05-24 19:01 ` Daniel Vetter [this message]
2012-07-05 11:29 ` Daniel Vetter
2012-07-05 12:01 ` [Intel-gfx] " Ville Syrjälä
2012-05-24 18:08 ` [PATCH 6/6] drm/i915: Reject page flips with changed format/offset/pitch ville.syrjala
2012-07-05 11:31 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2012-07-19 12:27 ` Laurent Pinchart
2012-07-19 12:39 ` Daniel Vetter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120524190124.GG5078@phenom.ffwll.local \
--to=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox