From: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
To: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] drm/i915: protect backlight registers and data with a spinlock
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 14:03:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130415130304.GA4106@cantiga.alporthouse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f9531f26aa447398dfdf894d88c3df99ab5aea10.1365768957.git.jani.nikula@intel.com>
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 03:18:37PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> Backlight data and registers are fiddled through LVDS/eDP modeset
> enable/disable hooks, backlight sysfs files, asle interrupts, and register
> save/restore. Protect the backlight related registers and driver private
> fields using a spinlock.
>
> The locking in register save/restore covers a little more than is strictly
> necessary, including non-modeset case, for simplicity.
>
> v2: Cover register access, save/restore, i915_read_blc_pwm_ctl() and code
> paths leading there.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Looks reasonable.
intel_panel_actually_set_backlight() should have a WARN_ON(!spinlocked);
The irqness of the register writes scares me slightly - since the IRQ in
question is from ACPI and we have a few bug reports along the lines of
"backlight makes the entire system sluggish" i.e. commonly associated
with bad interrupt handling. Whilst you are looking at updating the
backlight programming, can you look at pushing the writes from out
of the interrupt handler?
-Chris
--
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-15 13:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-12 12:18 [PATCH 0/4] drm/i915: backlight locking, cleanup Jani Nikula
2013-04-12 12:18 ` [PATCH 1/4] drm/i915: keep max backlight internal to intel_panel.c Jani Nikula
2013-04-12 12:32 ` Chris Wilson
2013-04-12 12:18 ` [PATCH 2/4] drm/i915: protect backlight registers and data with a spinlock Jani Nikula
2013-04-15 13:03 ` Chris Wilson [this message]
2013-04-15 16:38 ` Jani Nikula
2013-04-15 16:59 ` Daniel Vetter
2013-04-15 20:49 ` Chris Wilson
2013-04-15 21:40 ` Daniel Vetter
2013-04-25 12:13 ` Daniel Vetter
2013-04-12 12:18 ` [PATCH 3/4] drm/i915: ensure single initialization and cleanup of backlight device Jani Nikula
2013-04-15 6:33 ` Jani Nikula
2013-04-15 7:33 ` Daniel Vetter
2013-04-12 12:18 ` [PATCH 4/4] drm/i915: hsw backlight registers need transcoder instead of pipe Jani Nikula
2013-04-25 13:14 ` Imre Deak
2013-04-25 13:34 ` Daniel Vetter
2013-04-25 13:45 ` Daniel Vetter
2013-04-25 13:49 ` [PATCH v2] " Jani Nikula
2013-04-25 14:07 ` Imre Deak
2013-04-25 14:13 ` Daniel Vetter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130415130304.GA4106@cantiga.alporthouse.com \
--to=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox