From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
Intel Graphics Development <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
Arthur Ranyan <arthur.j.runyan@intel.com>,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Fix up sdvo hpd pins for i965g/gm
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 11:39:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130625093915.GO5823@phenom.ffwll.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130625074309.GB19636@cantiga.alporthouse.com>
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 08:43:09AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 09:04:40PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > Bspec seems to be full of lies, at least it disagress with reality:
> > Two systems corrobated that SDVO hpd bits are the same as on gen3.
> >
> > Cc: Arthur Ranyan <arthur.j.runyan@intel.com>
> > Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> > Tested-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> > Reported-and-tested-by: Alex Fiestas <afiestas@kde.org>
> > Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58405
> > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
> Acked-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Queued for -next, let's see whether there's a funny gen4.0 version out
there where Bspec is right ...
-Daniel
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-25 9:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-24 19:04 [PATCH] drm/i915: Fix up sdvo hpd pins for i965g/gm Daniel Vetter
2013-06-24 19:33 ` Daniel Vetter
2013-06-25 7:43 ` Chris Wilson
2013-06-25 9:39 ` Daniel Vetter [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130625093915.GO5823@phenom.ffwll.local \
--to=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=arthur.j.runyan@intel.com \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox