Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Skip pixel multiplier x-check if we fail to send the command

[Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>]

On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 09:52:33PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 07:46:00PM +0100, Damien Lespiau wrote:
> > If intel_sdvo_get_value() fails here, val is unitialized and the cross
> > check won't check anything.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sdvo.c | 5 ++++-
> >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sdvo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sdvo.c
> > index b8e1623..4481f6a 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sdvo.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sdvo.c
> > @@ -1357,7 +1357,10 @@ static void intel_sdvo_get_config(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
> >  	}
> >  
> >  	/* Cross check the port pixel multiplier with the sdvo encoder state. */
> > -	intel_sdvo_get_value(intel_sdvo, SDVO_CMD_GET_CLOCK_RATE_MULT, &val, 1);
> > +	if (!intel_sdvo_get_value(intel_sdvo, SDVO_CMD_GET_CLOCK_RATE_MULT,
> > +				  &val, 1))
> > +		return;
> 
> But now it fails silently instead of being paranoid ... Can we just shut
> up the tool instead?

We absolutely can! (and it's done).

-- 
Damien