public inbox for intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
To: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
Cc: Intel Graphics Development <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] drm/i915: unify GT/PM irq postinstall code
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 08:17:48 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130716061748.GI5784@phenom.ffwll.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130715001334.GB19451@bwidawsk.net>

On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 05:13:34PM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 11:31:29PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 01:55:20PM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 10:43:26PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> [snip]
> 
> > > 
> > > Maybe while you're doing this, explain why the L3 parity interrupt is
> > > special, in a comment. It's the only one to touch dev_priv->gt_irq_mask
> > 
> > I'll add 
> > 		/* L3 parity interrupt is always unmasked. */
> > 
> > before the gt_irq_mask assignemnt.
> 
> Actually, I was thinking more along the lines of "L3 parity interrupt is
> always unmasked. L3 parity interrupts are asynchronous with regard to
> batch submission, however they are delivered through ring interrupt
> registers."

We have more suche cases now with VECS going through PM interrupts. So I
don't think the fact that hw engineers sometimes steal bits from odd
places requires special mention. So I've opted for the simple version.
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch

  reply	other threads:[~2013-07-16  6:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-07-04 21:35 [PATCH 00/14] irq locking review v2 Daniel Vetter
2013-07-04 21:35 ` [PATCH 01/14] drm/i915: extract ibx_display_interrupt_update Daniel Vetter
2013-07-08 14:38   ` Paulo Zanoni
2013-07-09 15:21     ` Daniel Vetter
2013-07-04 21:35 ` [PATCH 02/14] drm/i915: improve SERR_INT clearing for fifo underrun reporting Daniel Vetter
2013-07-08 16:46   ` Paulo Zanoni
2013-07-09 20:58     ` [PATCH] " Daniel Vetter
2013-07-09 22:26       ` Paulo Zanoni
2013-07-10  6:30         ` Daniel Vetter
2013-07-10 19:45           ` Paulo Zanoni
2013-07-04 21:35 ` [PATCH 03/14] drm/i915: improve GEN7_ERR_INT " Daniel Vetter
2013-07-09 20:59   ` [PATCH] " Daniel Vetter
2013-07-10 19:47     ` Paulo Zanoni
2013-07-10 20:22       ` Daniel Vetter
2013-07-04 21:35 ` [PATCH 04/14] drm/i915: kill lpt pch transcoder->crtc mapping code for fifo underruns Daniel Vetter
2013-07-08 16:54   ` Paulo Zanoni
2013-07-04 21:35 ` [PATCH 05/14] drm/i915: irq handlers don't need interrupt-safe spinlocks Daniel Vetter
2013-07-04 21:35 ` [PATCH 06/14] drm/i915: streamline hsw_pm_irq_handler Daniel Vetter
2013-07-04 21:35 ` [PATCH 07/14] drm/i915: queue work outside spinlock in hsw_pm_irq_handler Daniel Vetter
2013-07-04 21:35 ` [PATCH 08/14] drm/i915: kill dev_priv->rps.lock Daniel Vetter
2013-07-04 21:35 ` [PATCH 09/14] drm/i915: unify ring irq refcounts (again) Daniel Vetter
2013-07-04 21:35 ` [PATCH 10/14] drm/i915: don't enable PM_VEBOX_CS_ERROR_INTERRUPT Daniel Vetter
2013-07-11 12:37   ` Daniel Vetter
2013-07-04 21:35 ` [PATCH 11/14] drm/i915: unify PM interrupt preinstall sequence Daniel Vetter
2013-07-08 17:06   ` Paulo Zanoni
2013-07-09 15:55     ` Daniel Vetter
2013-07-09 21:00     ` [PATCH] " Daniel Vetter
2013-07-10 20:05       ` Paulo Zanoni
2013-07-10 20:21         ` Daniel Vetter
2013-07-10 20:52           ` Paulo Zanoni
2013-07-04 21:35 ` [PATCH 12/14] drm/i915: unify GT/PM irq postinstall code Daniel Vetter
2013-07-10 20:48   ` Paulo Zanoni
2013-07-11  6:13     ` Daniel Vetter
2013-07-12 20:43       ` [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915: unify PM interrupt preinstall sequence Daniel Vetter
2013-07-12 20:43         ` [PATCH 2/3] drm/i915: unify GT/PM irq postinstall code Daniel Vetter
2013-07-14 20:55           ` Ben Widawsky
2013-07-14 21:31             ` Daniel Vetter
2013-07-14 21:40               ` Ben Widawsky
2013-07-15  0:13               ` Ben Widawsky
2013-07-16  6:17                 ` Daniel Vetter [this message]
2013-07-12 20:43         ` [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915: extract rps interrupt enable/disable helpers Daniel Vetter
2013-07-14 21:06           ` Ben Widawsky
2013-07-14 21:35             ` Daniel Vetter
2013-07-15 16:39               ` Ben Widawsky
2013-07-14 20:43         ` [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915: unify PM interrupt preinstall sequence Ben Widawsky
2013-07-04 21:35 ` [PATCH 13/14] drm/i915: extract rps interrupt enable/disable helpers Daniel Vetter
2013-07-10 21:12   ` Paulo Zanoni
2013-07-11  6:20     ` Daniel Vetter
2013-07-04 21:35 ` [PATCH 14/14] drm/i915: simplify rps interrupt enabling/disabling sequence Daniel Vetter
2013-07-16  6:19   ` Daniel Vetter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130716061748.GI5784@phenom.ffwll.local \
    --to=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=ben@bwidawsk.net \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox