* [PATCH] drm/i915/bdw: Don't use forcewake needlessly
@ 2013-12-10 13:24 ville.syrjala
2013-12-10 19:47 ` Ben Widawsky
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: ville.syrjala @ 2013-12-10 13:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx
From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Not all registers need forcewake even if they're not shadowed.
Add the missing NEEDS_FORCE_WAKE() check to gen8_writeX() to
avoid needless forcewake usage when writing eg. display
registers.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
---
I didn't test this at all, so be warned.
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
index e63658e..78fe8d6 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
@@ -616,7 +616,8 @@ static bool is_gen8_shadowed(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u32 reg)
#define __gen8_write(x) \
static void \
gen8_write##x(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, off_t reg, u##x val, bool trace) { \
- bool __needs_put = !is_gen8_shadowed(dev_priv, reg); \
+ bool __needs_put = NEEDS_FORCE_WAKE(dev_priv, reg) && \
+ !is_gen8_shadowed(dev_priv, reg); \
REG_WRITE_HEADER; \
if (__needs_put) { \
dev_priv->uncore.funcs.force_wake_get(dev_priv, \
--
1.8.3.2
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drm/i915/bdw: Don't use forcewake needlessly
2013-12-10 13:24 [PATCH] drm/i915/bdw: Don't use forcewake needlessly ville.syrjala
@ 2013-12-10 19:47 ` Ben Widawsky
2013-12-10 22:30 ` Daniel Vetter
2013-12-13 11:26 ` [PATCH v2] " ville.syrjala
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ben Widawsky @ 2013-12-10 19:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ville.syrjala; +Cc: intel-gfx
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 03:24:52PM +0200, ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
>
> Not all registers need forcewake even if they're not shadowed.
> Add the missing NEEDS_FORCE_WAKE() check to gen8_writeX() to
> avoid needless forcewake usage when writing eg. display
> registers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> I didn't test this at all, so be warned.
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
> index e63658e..78fe8d6 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
> @@ -616,7 +616,8 @@ static bool is_gen8_shadowed(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u32 reg)
> #define __gen8_write(x) \
> static void \
> gen8_write##x(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, off_t reg, u##x val, bool trace) { \
> - bool __needs_put = !is_gen8_shadowed(dev_priv, reg); \
> + bool __needs_put = NEEDS_FORCE_WAKE(dev_priv, reg) && \
> + !is_gen8_shadowed(dev_priv, reg); \
> REG_WRITE_HEADER; \
> if (__needs_put) { \
> dev_priv->uncore.funcs.force_wake_get(dev_priv, \
I would prefer if this was simply checking the display offset, as
opposed to NEEDS_FORCE_WAKE - since if someone adds to the macro we run
the risk of a potentially hard to track down bug.
In any case, the patch is functionally correct, and I'd prefer the
change, but up to you:
Reviewed-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
> --
> 1.8.3.2
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
--
Ben Widawsky, Intel Open Source Technology Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drm/i915/bdw: Don't use forcewake needlessly
2013-12-10 19:47 ` Ben Widawsky
@ 2013-12-10 22:30 ` Daniel Vetter
2013-12-13 11:26 ` [PATCH v2] " ville.syrjala
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Vetter @ 2013-12-10 22:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ben Widawsky; +Cc: intel-gfx
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 11:47:17AM -0800, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 03:24:52PM +0200, ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com wrote:
> > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> >
> > Not all registers need forcewake even if they're not shadowed.
> > Add the missing NEEDS_FORCE_WAKE() check to gen8_writeX() to
> > avoid needless forcewake usage when writing eg. display
> > registers.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> > I didn't test this at all, so be warned.
> >
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c | 3 ++-
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
> > index e63658e..78fe8d6 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
> > @@ -616,7 +616,8 @@ static bool is_gen8_shadowed(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u32 reg)
> > #define __gen8_write(x) \
> > static void \
> > gen8_write##x(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, off_t reg, u##x val, bool trace) { \
> > - bool __needs_put = !is_gen8_shadowed(dev_priv, reg); \
> > + bool __needs_put = NEEDS_FORCE_WAKE(dev_priv, reg) && \
> > + !is_gen8_shadowed(dev_priv, reg); \
> > REG_WRITE_HEADER; \
> > if (__needs_put) { \
> > dev_priv->uncore.funcs.force_wake_get(dev_priv, \
>
> I would prefer if this was simply checking the display offset, as
> opposed to NEEDS_FORCE_WAKE - since if someone adds to the macro we run
> the risk of a potentially hard to track down bug.
Yeah, I agree that an explicit check would be better since the forcewake
stuff works a bit different on gen8+
-Daniel
>
> In any case, the patch is functionally correct, and I'd prefer the
> change, but up to you:
> Reviewed-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
>
> > --
> > 1.8.3.2
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Intel-gfx mailing list
> > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
>
> --
> Ben Widawsky, Intel Open Source Technology Center
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2] drm/i915/bdw: Don't use forcewake needlessly
2013-12-10 19:47 ` Ben Widawsky
2013-12-10 22:30 ` Daniel Vetter
@ 2013-12-13 11:26 ` ville.syrjala
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: ville.syrjala @ 2013-12-13 11:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx; +Cc: Ben Widawsky
From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Not all registers need forcewake even if they're not shadowed.
Add the missing check to gen8_writeX() to avoid needless forcewake
usage when writing eg. display registers.
v2: Use straight up <0x40000 check instead of NEEDS_FORCE_WAKE()
Reviewed-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
index 8102af9..3fa1409 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
@@ -629,7 +629,7 @@ static bool is_gen8_shadowed(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u32 reg)
#define __gen8_write(x) \
static void \
gen8_write##x(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, off_t reg, u##x val, bool trace) { \
- bool __needs_put = !is_gen8_shadowed(dev_priv, reg); \
+ bool __needs_put = reg < 0x40000 && !is_gen8_shadowed(dev_priv, reg); \
REG_WRITE_HEADER; \
if (__needs_put) { \
dev_priv->uncore.funcs.force_wake_get(dev_priv, \
--
1.8.3.2
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-12-13 11:26 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-12-10 13:24 [PATCH] drm/i915/bdw: Don't use forcewake needlessly ville.syrjala
2013-12-10 19:47 ` Ben Widawsky
2013-12-10 22:30 ` Daniel Vetter
2013-12-13 11:26 ` [PATCH v2] " ville.syrjala
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox