Intel-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
To: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Cc: Intel GFX <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	Ben Widawsky <benjamin.widawsky@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/15] [v2] Broadwell HW semaphore
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2013 19:21:34 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131217182134.GQ9804@phenom.ffwll.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131217162955.GE30739@strange.amr.corp.intel.com>

On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 04:29:56PM +0000, Damien Lespiau wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 10:17:38AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 08:50:36PM -0800, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> > > Reposting this as a new series since two of the patches dropped off
> > > since last time.
> > > 
> > > Functionally it's the same as before. Like before, the patch "drm/i915:
> > > unleash semaphores on gen8" should probably not be merged as it's not
> > > 100% clear where the hang is currently coming from. Everything else
> > > should be pretty benign for other platforms.
> > 
> > I've pulled in the first two patches already. For review Damien is signed
> > up (althought he goes on vacation soon) and for greater learning
> > experience he's also agreed to throw in a testcase on top.
> > 
> > We already have a nice stresstest for semaphores (gem_ring_sync_loop), but
> > no real functional test which checks that the batches are indeed correctly
> > ordered. For gpu vs. cpu races we already have a fairly complete set in
> > gem_concurrent_blt, but that has many additional complications we don't
> > really care about for ring2ring syncing.
> > 
> > For each pair of rings R1, R2 where we have copy support (i.e. blt,
> > rendercpy and mediafill) do:
> 
> mediafill and rendercopy both use the render ring, so only one of them
> is useful here, right?

Oh dear, somehow I've thought that was launched on the vcs like a compute
job. So yeah, we can only test between blt and render then. I guess I
should read the patches more carefully ;-)

> Might need to investigate similar blit batches for other rings, if
> possible at all.

Yeah, otoh we should be able to test the general logic with this. And if
there's a type somewhere in the vcs/vecs tables, well mea culpa.
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch

      reply	other threads:[~2013-12-17 18:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-12-17  4:50 [PATCH 00/15] [v2] Broadwell HW semaphore Ben Widawsky
2013-12-17  4:50 ` [PATCH 01/15] drm/i915: Reorder/respace MI instruction definition Ben Widawsky
2013-12-17 23:06   ` [PATCH 01.5/15] drm/i915: Make semaphore modparam RO Ben Widawsky
2013-12-17  4:50 ` [PATCH 02/15] drm/i915: Don't emit mbox updates without semaphores Ben Widawsky
2013-12-17 19:24   ` Chris Wilson
2013-12-17 22:02     ` Ben Widawsky
2013-12-17 22:47       ` Chris Wilson
2013-12-17  4:50 ` [PATCH 03/15] drm/i915: Move semaphore specific ring members to struct Ben Widawsky
2013-12-17  4:50 ` [PATCH 04/15] drm/i915: Virtualize the ringbuffer signal func Ben Widawsky
2013-12-17  4:50 ` [PATCH 05/15] drm/i915: Move ring_begin to signal() Ben Widawsky
2013-12-17  4:50 ` [PATCH 06/15] drm/i915: Make semaphore updates more precise Ben Widawsky
2013-12-17  9:49   ` Chris Wilson
2013-12-17  4:50 ` [PATCH 07/15] drm/i915: gen specific ring init Ben Widawsky
2013-12-17  8:52   ` Daniel Vetter
2013-12-17  4:50 ` [PATCH 08/15] drm/i915/bdw: implement semaphore signal Ben Widawsky
2013-12-17 19:11   ` Chris Wilson
2013-12-17 23:00     ` [PATCH 08/15] [v3] " Ben Widawsky
2013-12-17  4:50 ` [PATCH 09/15] drm/i915/bdw: implement semaphore wait Ben Widawsky
2013-12-17 19:22   ` Chris Wilson
2013-12-17 23:31     ` [PATCH 09/15] [v3] " Ben Widawsky
2013-12-17  4:50 ` [PATCH 10/15] drm/i915: FORCE_RESTORE for gen8 semaphores Ben Widawsky
2013-12-17  4:50 ` [PATCH 11/15] drm/i915/bdw: poll semaphores Ben Widawsky
2013-12-17 19:17   ` Chris Wilson
2013-12-17  4:50 ` [PATCH 12/15] drm/i915: Extract semaphore error collection Ben Widawsky
2013-12-17 19:14   ` Chris Wilson
2013-12-17 23:37     ` Ben Widawsky
2013-12-17  4:50 ` [PATCH 13/15] drm/i915/bdw: collect semaphore error state Ben Widawsky
2013-12-17  4:50 ` [PATCH 14/15] drm/i915: unleash semaphores on gen8 Ben Widawsky
2013-12-17  4:50 ` [PATCH 15/15] drm/i915: semaphore debugfs Ben Widawsky
2013-12-17  9:17 ` [PATCH 00/15] [v2] Broadwell HW semaphore Daniel Vetter
2013-12-17 16:29   ` Damien Lespiau
2013-12-17 18:21     ` Daniel Vetter [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20131217182134.GQ9804@phenom.ffwll.local \
    --to=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=benjamin.widawsky@intel.com \
    --cc=damien.lespiau@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox