From: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
"intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org"
<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Add OACONTROL to the command parser register whitelist.
Date: Fri, 16 May 2014 13:12:49 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140516131249.5e696f70@jbarnes-desktop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140516194930.GB4495@nuc-i3427.alporthouse.com>
On Fri, 16 May 2014 20:49:30 +0100
Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> wrote:
> On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 12:34:08PM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > On Fri, 16 May 2014 20:20:50 +0100
> > Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> wrote:
> > > We haven't even fixed the major regression from enabling FBC. What's
> > > another massive slowdown?
> >
> > I thought you had that fixed in the X driver by avoiding front buffer
> > rendering altogether. If that's the case we just need an ioctl to opt
> > out of front buffer tracking, right? Presumably that flag would follow
> > the current DRM_MASTER process...
>
> No. All rendering triggers FBC updates. Ville has patches to fix the
> majority of that with only nuking FBC when front buffer rendering. (Note
> that games aren't usually affected by this because FBC is disabled by
> pageflipping.) The overhead could probably be reduced further by periodic
> nuking the FBC like (ideally) PSR. And yes X can avoid front buffer
> rendering altogether. The remaining challenge is to know when to enable it
> (the kernel doesn't give us any information about FBC or PSR after setting a
> mode) and when not, i.e. there is already a pageflipping compositor.
I thought there was a control bit for when the nuke occurred? If not,
yeah I guess we have to go with a sw approach...
--
Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-16 20:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-26 5:52 [PATCH] drm/i915: Add OACONTROL to the command parser register whitelist Kenneth Graunke
2014-03-26 6:21 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-03-26 16:03 ` Volkin, Bradley D
2014-03-26 16:38 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-03-26 17:37 ` Kenneth Graunke
2014-03-26 18:26 ` Volkin, Bradley D
2014-03-26 21:48 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-03-26 22:34 ` Kenneth Graunke
2014-03-27 7:57 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-03-27 15:57 ` Volkin, Bradley D
2014-03-27 20:16 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-03-27 21:34 ` Kenneth Graunke
2014-03-27 22:44 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-03-27 23:22 ` Kenneth Graunke
2014-05-16 19:05 ` Jesse Barnes
2014-05-16 19:20 ` Chris Wilson
2014-05-16 19:34 ` Jesse Barnes
2014-05-16 19:49 ` Chris Wilson
2014-05-16 20:12 ` Jesse Barnes [this message]
2014-05-16 19:53 ` Jesse Barnes
2014-05-16 20:12 ` Volkin, Bradley D
2014-05-16 20:14 ` Jesse Barnes
2014-03-27 23:42 ` Volkin, Bradley D
2014-03-28 7:36 ` Chris Wilson
2014-03-26 9:57 ` Jani Nikula
2014-03-26 10:41 ` [PATCH v2] " Kenneth Graunke
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140516131249.5e696f70@jbarnes-desktop \
--to=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).