From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
Intel Graphics Development <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Introduce accurate frontbuffer tracking
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 17:55:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140618155531.GK5821@phenom.ffwll.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140618145544.GQ31023@nuc-i3427.alporthouse.com>
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 03:55:44PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 03:01:25PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > +void i915_gem_update_fb_bits(struct drm_i915_gem_object *old,
> > + struct drm_i915_gem_object *new,
> > + unsigned frontbuffer_bits);
> > +
>
> Time to be a nuisance:
>
> i915_gem_object_track_fb()
>
> The key part is that is operates on the object. The other is just to try
> and shorten the name as compensation.
Hm, I've thought the i915_gem part is a giveaway - I'm not too fond of the
i915_gem_obj prefix since it's so long ...
> > @@ -1062,6 +1065,7 @@ intel_disable_plane(struct drm_plane *plane)
> > struct drm_device *dev = plane->dev;
> > struct intel_plane *intel_plane = to_intel_plane(plane);
> > struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc;
> > + enum pipe pipe;
> >
> > if (!plane->fb)
> > return 0;
> > @@ -1070,6 +1074,7 @@ intel_disable_plane(struct drm_plane *plane)
> > return -EINVAL;
> >
> > intel_crtc = to_intel_crtc(plane->crtc);
> > + pipe = intel_crtc->pipe;
> >
> > if (intel_crtc->active) {
> > bool primary_was_enabled = intel_crtc->primary_enabled;
> > @@ -1088,6 +1093,8 @@ intel_disable_plane(struct drm_plane *plane)
> >
> > mutex_lock(&dev->struct_mutex);
> > intel_unpin_fb_obj(intel_plane->obj);
> > + i915_gem_update_fb_bits(intel_plane->obj, NULL,
> > + INTEL_FRONTBUFFER_SPRITE(pipe));
>
> Introducing a local here for a one off, or was checkpatch in an angry
> mood with INTEL_FRONTBUFFER_SPRITE(intel_crtc->pipe) ?
Just a case of shortening the line a bit, it looks terribly ugly imo. I
hope we can prettify this once we have a bit more unified nuclear flip
logic for all planes.
> That's all I spotted, the logic looks fine. But just remind me,
> i915_gem_object_track_fb() did do a lockdep_assert_held(&dev->struct_mutex)?
Yeah, both when new or old are non-NULL, as a prep for per-object locking.
If we ever get there ;-)
-Daniel
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-18 15:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-18 11:59 [PATCH 00/16] PSR rework and accurate frontbuffer tracking Daniel Vetter
2014-06-18 11:59 ` [PATCH 01/16] drm/i915: Drop unecessary complexity from psr_inactivate Daniel Vetter
2014-06-18 11:59 ` [PATCH 02/16] drm/i915: Ditch intel_edp_psr_update Daniel Vetter
2014-06-18 11:59 ` [PATCH 03/16] drm/i915: Run psr_setup unconditionally Daniel Vetter
2014-06-18 11:59 ` [PATCH 04/16] drm/i915: Drop schedule_back from psr_exit Daniel Vetter
2014-06-18 11:59 ` [PATCH 05/16] drm/i915: Add a FIXME about drrs/psr interactions Daniel Vetter
2014-06-18 11:59 ` [PATCH 06/16] drm/i915: Track the psr dp connector in dev_priv->psr.enabled Daniel Vetter
2014-06-18 11:59 ` [PATCH 07/16] drm/i915: Don't try to disable psr harder from the work item Daniel Vetter
2014-06-18 11:59 ` [PATCH 08/16] drm/i915: Lock down psr sw/hw state tracking Daniel Vetter
2014-06-18 11:59 ` [PATCH 09/16] drm/i915: More checks for psr.enabled Daniel Vetter
2014-06-18 12:27 ` Chris Wilson
2014-06-18 12:41 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-06-18 12:46 ` Chris Wilson
2014-06-18 13:03 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-06-18 11:59 ` [PATCH 10/16] drm/i915: Add locking to psr code Daniel Vetter
2014-06-18 11:59 ` [PATCH 11/16] drm/i915: Introduce accurate frontbuffer tracking Daniel Vetter
2014-06-18 12:20 ` Chris Wilson
2014-06-18 13:01 ` [PATCH] " Daniel Vetter
2014-06-18 14:55 ` Chris Wilson
2014-06-18 15:55 ` Daniel Vetter [this message]
2014-06-18 15:58 ` Chris Wilson
2014-06-18 16:05 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-06-18 16:14 ` Chris Wilson
2014-06-18 21:28 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-06-19 7:29 ` Chris Wilson
2014-06-18 13:05 ` [PATCH] drm/i915: Properly track domain of the fbcon fb Daniel Vetter
2014-06-18 14:57 ` Chris Wilson
2014-06-18 15:57 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-06-18 16:15 ` Chris Wilson
2014-06-18 11:59 ` [PATCH 12/16] drm/i915: Use new frontbuffer bits to increase pll clock Daniel Vetter
2014-06-18 14:46 ` Chris Wilson
2014-06-18 11:59 ` [PATCH 13/16] drm/i915: Properly track domain of the fbcon fb Daniel Vetter
2014-06-18 12:10 ` Chris Wilson
2014-06-18 12:44 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-06-18 13:09 ` [PATCH] " Daniel Vetter
2014-06-18 11:59 ` [PATCH 14/16] drm/i915: Track frontbuffer invalidation/flushing Daniel Vetter
2014-06-18 14:43 ` Chris Wilson
2014-06-19 12:41 ` [PATCH] " Daniel Vetter
2014-06-19 13:02 ` Chris Wilson
2014-06-19 13:54 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-06-19 14:01 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-06-19 15:12 ` Chris Wilson
2014-06-19 16:15 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-06-18 11:59 ` [PATCH 15/16] drm/i915: Fix up PSR frontbuffer tracking Daniel Vetter
2014-06-18 11:59 ` [PATCH 16/16] drm/i915: Improve PSR debugfs output Daniel Vetter
2014-06-18 12:46 ` [PATCH] drm/i915: Print obj->frontbuffer_bits in " Daniel Vetter
2014-06-18 14:50 ` Chris Wilson
2014-06-18 16:00 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-06-18 14:51 ` [PATCH 16/16] drm/i915: Improve PSR " Chris Wilson
2014-06-18 16:02 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-06-18 13:08 ` [PATCH] drm/i915: Remove redundant HAS_PSR checks Daniel Vetter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140618155531.GK5821@phenom.ffwll.local \
--to=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox