From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/dsi: lose the loose 666 format name in favor of packed
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2016 16:18:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160316141820.GC4329@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1458123700-16003-1-git-send-email-jani.nikula@intel.com>
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 12:21:39PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> The enum mipi_dsi_pixel_format defines MIPI_DSI_FMT_RGB666 for the
> "loose" 24 bpp format and MIPI_DSI_FMT_RGB666_PACKED for the 18 bpp
> format. We have this the other way round, defining a loose version for
> 24 bpp.
>
> Follow suit with what's in enum mipi_dsi_pixel_format to avoid future
> confusion. Rename
>
> VID_MODE_FORMAT_RGB666 -> VID_MODE_FORMAT_RGB666_PACKED
> VID_MODE_FORMAT_RGB666_LOOSE -> VID_MODE_FORMAT_RGB666
This goes against our spec a bit, and the DSI spec calls these
"packed" and "loosly packed". So I'm not entirely thrilled about the
names used in the mipi_dsi_pixel_format either. I think the best
option would be to call them something like 666_18 and 666_24 to
avoid all the confusion.
But patch looks sane anyway so
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
>
> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 4 ++--
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi_pll.c | 4 ++--
> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> index 7dfc4007f3fa..85ceec611412 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> @@ -7887,8 +7887,8 @@ enum skl_disp_power_wells {
> #define VID_MODE_FORMAT_MASK (0xf << 7)
> #define VID_MODE_NOT_SUPPORTED (0 << 7)
> #define VID_MODE_FORMAT_RGB565 (1 << 7)
> -#define VID_MODE_FORMAT_RGB666 (2 << 7)
> -#define VID_MODE_FORMAT_RGB666_LOOSE (3 << 7)
> +#define VID_MODE_FORMAT_RGB666_PACKED (2 << 7)
> +#define VID_MODE_FORMAT_RGB666 (3 << 7)
> #define VID_MODE_FORMAT_RGB888 (4 << 7)
> #define CMD_MODE_CHANNEL_NUMBER_SHIFT 5
> #define CMD_MODE_CHANNEL_NUMBER_MASK (3 << 5)
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi_pll.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi_pll.c
> index 2451c84949bd..9ef0f7806e4a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi_pll.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi_pll.c
> @@ -37,10 +37,10 @@ int dsi_pixel_format_bpp(int pixel_format)
> switch (pixel_format) {
> default:
> case VID_MODE_FORMAT_RGB888:
> - case VID_MODE_FORMAT_RGB666_LOOSE:
> + case VID_MODE_FORMAT_RGB666:
> bpp = 24;
> break;
> - case VID_MODE_FORMAT_RGB666:
> + case VID_MODE_FORMAT_RGB666_PACKED:
> bpp = 18;
> break;
> case VID_MODE_FORMAT_RGB565:
> --
> 2.1.4
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-16 14:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-16 10:21 [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/dsi: lose the loose 666 format name in favor of packed Jani Nikula
2016-03-16 10:21 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/dsi: start using enum mipi_dsi_pixel_format Jani Nikula
2016-03-16 14:20 ` Ville Syrjälä
2016-03-16 12:48 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for series starting with [1/2] drm/i915/dsi: lose the loose 666 format name in favor of packed Patchwork
2016-03-16 13:37 ` Jani Nikula
2016-03-16 14:18 ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2016-03-16 15:58 ` [PATCH 1/2] " Jani Nikula
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-01-14 10:28 Jani Nikula
2016-01-14 13:51 ` Mika Kahola
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160316141820.GC4329@intel.com \
--to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox