From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915/dp: Validate cached link rate and lane count before retraining
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2017 16:40:04 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170327134004.GL30290@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1490310692-24468-1-git-send-email-manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 04:11:32PM -0700, Manasi Navare wrote:
> Currently intel_dp_check_link_status() tries to retrain the link if
> Clock recovery or Channel EQ for any of the lanes indicated by
> intel_dp->lane_count is not set. However these values cached in intel_dp
> structure can be stale if link training has failed for these values
> during previous modeset. Or these values can get stale since we have
> now re read the DPCD registers or it can be 0 in case of connected boot
> case.
>
> This patch validates these values against the common_rates and max lane
> count values.
>
> This is absolutely required incase the common_rates or max lane count
> are now different due to link fallback.
>
> Cc: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> index fd96a6c..51fa6b5 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> @@ -295,6 +295,23 @@ static int intel_dp_link_rate_index(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> return -1;
> }
>
> +static bool intel_dp_link_params_is_valid(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> +{
> + int common_rates[DP_MAX_SUPPORTED_RATES];
> + int link_rate_index;
> +
> + link_rate_index = intel_dp_link_rate_index(intel_dp,
> + common_rates,
> + intel_dp->link_rate);
Hmm. I thought we started to store the common rates somewhere more
permanent, or did I imagine that?
> + if (link_rate_index < 0)
> + return false;
> + if (!intel_dp->lane_count ||
> + (intel_dp->lane_count > intel_dp_max_lane_count(intel_dp)))
Needless parens.
> + return false;
> +
> + return true;
> +}
> +
> int intel_dp_get_link_train_fallback_values(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> int link_rate, uint8_t lane_count)
> {
> @@ -4224,9 +4241,10 @@ intel_dp_check_link_status(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> if (!to_intel_crtc(intel_encoder->base.crtc)->active)
> return;
>
> - /* FIXME: we need to synchronize this sort of stuff with hardware
> - * readout. Currently fast link training doesn't work on boot-up. */
You shouldn't remove the FIXME. It's still totally valid.
> - if (!intel_dp->lane_count)
> + /* Validate the cached values of intel_dp->link_rate and
> + * intel_dp->lane_count before attempting to retrain.
> + */
> + if (!intel_dp_link_params_is_valid(intel_dp))
> return;
>
> /* Retrain if Channel EQ or CR not ok */
> --
> 2.1.4
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-27 13:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-23 23:11 [PATCH] drm/i915/dp: Validate cached link rate and lane count before retraining Manasi Navare
2017-03-24 10:56 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2017-03-27 13:40 ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2017-03-27 15:26 ` [PATCH] " Jani Nikula
2017-03-27 16:53 ` Manasi Navare
2017-03-27 17:21 ` Ville Syrjälä
2017-03-27 18:44 ` Manasi Navare
2017-03-28 7:34 ` Jani Nikula
2017-03-28 15:46 ` Manasi Navare
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170327134004.GL30290@intel.com \
--to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=manasi.d.navare@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox