[PATCH 4.10 01/29] drm/i915: Fix forcewake active domain tracking

[PATCH 4.10 01/29] drm/i915: Fix forcewake active domain tracking

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

4.10-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>

commit 6aef660370a9c246956ba6d01eebd8063c4214cb upstream.

In commit 003342a50021 ("drm/i915: Keep track of active
forcewake domains in a bitmask") I forgot to adjust the
newly introduce fw_domains_active state across reset.

This caused the assert_forcewakes_inactive to trigger
during suspend and resume if there were user held
forcewakes.

v2: Bitmask checks are required since vfuncs are not
    always present.

v3: Move bitmask tracking to get/put vfunc for simplicity.
    (Chris Wilson)

Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Fixes: 003342a50021 ("drm/i915: Keep track of active forcewake domains in a bitmask")
Testcase: igt/drv_suspend/forcewake
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: "Paneri, Praveen" <praveen.paneri@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170310093249.4484-1-tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com
(cherry picked from commit b8473050805f35add97f3ff57570d55a01808df5)
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c |   13 ++++++-------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
@@ -119,6 +119,8 @@ fw_domains_get(struct drm_i915_private *
 
 	for_each_fw_domain_masked(d, fw_domains, dev_priv)
 		fw_domain_wait_ack(d);
+
+	dev_priv->uncore.fw_domains_active |= fw_domains;
 }
 
 static void
@@ -130,6 +132,8 @@ fw_domains_put(struct drm_i915_private *
 		fw_domain_put(d);
 		fw_domain_posting_read(d);
 	}
+
+	dev_priv->uncore.fw_domains_active &= ~fw_domains;
 }
 
 static void
@@ -240,10 +244,8 @@ intel_uncore_fw_release_timer(struct hrt
 	if (WARN_ON(domain->wake_count == 0))
 		domain->wake_count++;
 
-	if (--domain->wake_count == 0) {
+	if (--domain->wake_count == 0)
 		dev_priv->uncore.funcs.force_wake_put(dev_priv, domain->mask);
-		dev_priv->uncore.fw_domains_active &= ~domain->mask;
-	}
 
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev_priv->uncore.lock, irqflags);
 
@@ -455,10 +457,8 @@ static void __intel_uncore_forcewake_get
 			fw_domains &= ~domain->mask;
 	}
 
-	if (fw_domains) {
+	if (fw_domains)
 		dev_priv->uncore.funcs.force_wake_get(dev_priv, fw_domains);
-		dev_priv->uncore.fw_domains_active |= fw_domains;
-	}
 }
 
 /**
@@ -962,7 +962,6 @@ static noinline void ___force_wake_auto(
 		fw_domain_arm_timer(domain);
 
 	dev_priv->uncore.funcs.force_wake_get(dev_priv, fw_domains);
-	dev_priv->uncore.fw_domains_active |= fw_domains;
 }
 
 static inline void __force_wake_auto(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,


_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx