Intel-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk
Subject: [PATCH i-g-t 0/5] igt/kms: Make fence waiting explicit.
Date: Thu,  6 Jul 2017 09:11:42 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170706071147.15414-1-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> (raw)

I wanted to make kms_atomic_transition pass, but the nonblocking modeset
fencing tests were bogus.

This series changes the semantics for fencing slightly. It only keeps the out fences
in pipe_obj->out_fence_fd, it's up to the test to decide what to do with it, which
is probably just waiting on the fd or checking if it completed.

Maarten Lankhorst (5):
  tests/kms_atomic_transition: Add test for plane completion ordering.
  lib/kms: Handle fence interaction correctly WRT TEST_ONLY.
  tests/kms_atomic_transition: Only request fence on enabled pipes
  tests/kms_atomic_transition: Do not clear in-fences after atomic
    commit.
  igt/kms: Do not wait for fence completion during commit

 lib/igt_kms.c                 | 41 ++++++++----------
 tests/kms_atomic_transition.c | 99 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
 2 files changed, 95 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)

-- 
2.11.0

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

             reply	other threads:[~2017-07-06  7:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-07-06  7:11 Maarten Lankhorst [this message]
2017-07-06  7:11 ` [PATCH i-g-t 1/5] tests/kms_atomic_transition: Add test for plane completion ordering Maarten Lankhorst
2017-07-06  7:11 ` [PATCH i-g-t 2/5] lib/kms: Handle fence interaction correctly WRT TEST_ONLY Maarten Lankhorst
2017-07-06  7:11 ` [PATCH i-g-t 3/5] tests/kms_atomic_transition: Only request fence on enabled pipes Maarten Lankhorst
2017-07-06  7:11 ` [PATCH i-g-t 4/5] tests/kms_atomic_transition: Do not clear in-fences after atomic commit Maarten Lankhorst
2017-07-06  7:11 ` [PATCH i-g-t 5/5] igt/kms: Do not wait for fence completion during commit Maarten Lankhorst
2017-07-07  0:15 ` [PATCH i-g-t 0/5] igt/kms: Make fence waiting explicit Gustavo Padovan
2017-07-10  7:06   ` Maarten Lankhorst

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170706071147.15414-1-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
    --to=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox