[PATCH i-g-t] tests/gem_exec_params: Update the invalid-flag subtest for FENCE_ARRAY

[PATCH i-g-t] tests/gem_exec_params: Update the invalid-flag subtest for FENCE_ARRAY

[Jason Ekstrand]

Tests for the new flag were added in 3685dabb0ab25eb1.

Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
---
 tests/gem_exec_params.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tests/gem_exec_params.c b/tests/gem_exec_params.c
index ba6d67c..5b72072 100644
--- a/tests/gem_exec_params.c
+++ b/tests/gem_exec_params.c
@@ -48,6 +48,7 @@
 #define LOCAL_I915_EXEC_FENCE_IN (1 << 16)
 #define LOCAL_I915_EXEC_FENCE_OUT (1 << 17)
 #define LOCAL_I915_EXEC_BATCH_FIRST (1 << 18)
+#define LOCAL_I915_EXEC_FENCE_ARRAY (1 << 19)
 
 static bool has_ring(int fd, unsigned ring_exec_flags)
 {
@@ -357,7 +358,7 @@ igt_main
 		/* NOTE: This test intentionally exercise the next available
 		 * flag. Don't "fix" this testcase without adding the required
 		 * tests for the new flag first. */
-		execbuf.flags = I915_EXEC_RENDER | (LOCAL_I915_EXEC_BATCH_FIRST << 1);
+		execbuf.flags = I915_EXEC_RENDER | (LOCAL_I915_EXEC_FENCE_ARRAY << 1);
 		RUN_FAIL(EINVAL);
 	}
 
-- 
2.5.0.400.gff86faf

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for tests/gem_exec_params: Update the invalid-flag subtest for FENCE_ARRAY

[Patchwork]

== Series Details ==

Series: tests/gem_exec_params: Update the invalid-flag subtest for FENCE_ARRAY
URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/28831/
State : success

== Summary ==

IGT patchset tested on top of latest successful build
8d2ad9d4d4ba35e1ca8a4989347825fa8e8c0072 tests/kms_flip: fix spin_batch conversion

with latest DRM-Tip kernel build CI_DRM_2967
134bab7e0e7c drm-tip: 2017y-08m-15d-15h-48m-26s UTC integration manifest

Test gem_exec_flush:
        Subgroup basic-batch-kernel-default-uc:
                fail       -> PASS       (fi-snb-2600) fdo#100007

fdo#100007 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100007

fi-bdw-5557u     total:279  pass:268  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:11  time:445s
fi-bdw-gvtdvm    total:279  pass:265  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:14  time:433s
fi-blb-e6850     total:279  pass:224  dwarn:1   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:54  time:358s
fi-bsw-n3050     total:279  pass:243  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:36  time:563s
fi-bxt-j4205     total:279  pass:260  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:19  time:516s
fi-byt-j1900     total:279  pass:254  dwarn:1   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:24  time:524s
fi-byt-n2820     total:279  pass:250  dwarn:1   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:28  time:506s
fi-glk-2a        total:279  pass:260  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:19  time:605s
fi-hsw-4770      total:279  pass:263  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:16  time:442s
fi-hsw-4770r     total:279  pass:263  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:16  time:422s
fi-ilk-650       total:279  pass:229  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:50  time:425s
fi-ivb-3520m     total:279  pass:261  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:18  time:501s
fi-ivb-3770      total:279  pass:261  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:18  time:481s
fi-kbl-7500u     total:279  pass:261  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:18  time:468s
fi-kbl-7560u     total:279  pass:269  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:10  time:583s
fi-kbl-r         total:279  pass:261  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:18  time:593s
fi-pnv-d510      total:279  pass:223  dwarn:1   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:55  time:526s
fi-skl-6260u     total:279  pass:269  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:10  time:462s
fi-skl-6700k     total:279  pass:261  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:18  time:476s
fi-skl-6770hq    total:279  pass:269  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:10  time:477s
fi-skl-gvtdvm    total:279  pass:266  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:13  time:439s
fi-skl-x1585l    total:279  pass:268  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:11  time:493s
fi-snb-2520m     total:279  pass:251  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:28  time:550s
fi-snb-2600      total:279  pass:250  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:29  time:409s

== Logs ==

For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_67/
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Re: [PATCH i-g-t] tests/gem_exec_params: Update the invalid-flag subtest for FENCE_ARRAY

[Daniel Vetter]

On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 03:37:23PM -0700, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> Tests for the new flag were added in 3685dabb0ab25eb1.
> 
> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>

Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

> ---
>  tests/gem_exec_params.c | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tests/gem_exec_params.c b/tests/gem_exec_params.c
> index ba6d67c..5b72072 100644
> --- a/tests/gem_exec_params.c
> +++ b/tests/gem_exec_params.c
> @@ -48,6 +48,7 @@
>  #define LOCAL_I915_EXEC_FENCE_IN (1 << 16)
>  #define LOCAL_I915_EXEC_FENCE_OUT (1 << 17)
>  #define LOCAL_I915_EXEC_BATCH_FIRST (1 << 18)
> +#define LOCAL_I915_EXEC_FENCE_ARRAY (1 << 19)
>  
>  static bool has_ring(int fd, unsigned ring_exec_flags)
>  {
> @@ -357,7 +358,7 @@ igt_main
>  		/* NOTE: This test intentionally exercise the next available
>  		 * flag. Don't "fix" this testcase without adding the required
>  		 * tests for the new flag first. */
> -		execbuf.flags = I915_EXEC_RENDER | (LOCAL_I915_EXEC_BATCH_FIRST << 1);
> +		execbuf.flags = I915_EXEC_RENDER | (LOCAL_I915_EXEC_FENCE_ARRAY << 1);
>  		RUN_FAIL(EINVAL);
>  	}
>  
> -- 
> 2.5.0.400.gff86faf
> 

-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx