public inbox for intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
To: Ramalingam C <ramalingam.c@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] drm/i915: Runtime disable for eDP DRRS
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2017 10:53:52 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171117185352.3gbnlmlsydr6e5xs@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1510079903-29441-1-git-send-email-ramalingam.c@intel.com>

On Tue, Nov 07, 2017 at 06:38:23PM +0000, Ramalingam C wrote:
> From: "C, Ramalingam" <ramalingam.c@intel.com>
> 
> Debugfs called i915_drrs_ctl is added to enable and disable the
> eDP DRRS. Writing 0 will disable the feature, whereas non-zero
> will enable the feature.
> 
> Possibility of disabling the DRRS, enables the testing of the
> frontbuffer tracking based features (FBC, DRRS and PSR) as
> standalone or any combination of the set.
> 
> [v2]: ctl interface is moved from module parameter to debugfs [Rodrigo]

Thanks

> 
> Signed-off-by: C, Ramalingam <ramalingam.c@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> index 0bb6e01121fc..0c1501fe4c9f 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> @@ -4747,6 +4747,46 @@ static const struct file_operations i915_hpd_storm_ctl_fops = {
>  	.write = i915_hpd_storm_ctl_write
>  };
>  
> +static int i915_drrs_ctl_set(void *data, u64 val)
> +{
> +	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = data;
> +	struct drm_device *dev = &dev_priv->drm;
> +	struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc;
> +	struct intel_encoder *encoder;
> +	struct intel_dp *intel_dp;
> +
> +	if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) < 7)

I believe we need to define a HAS_DRRS(dev_priv)
which based on what is on intel_cpu_transcoder_set_m_n would be
(IS_CHERRYVIEW(dev_priv) || INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) < 8)

> +		return -ENODEV;
> +
> +	drm_modeset_lock_all(dev);

my first reaction to this was: "why do you need to lock all modeset?!"
But this simplify a lot the logic here...
This assure that drrs is really not getting changed from other places.

> +	for_each_intel_crtc(dev, intel_crtc) {
> +		if (!intel_crtc->base.state->active ||
> +					!intel_crtc->config->has_drrs)

I was going to say that this check already happens inside
enable and disable functions... But I see the reason why to
check before the unecessary noise.

> +			continue;
> +
> +		for_each_encoder_on_crtc(dev, &intel_crtc->base, encoder) {
> +			if (encoder->type != INTEL_OUTPUT_EDP)
> +				continue;
> +
> +			DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("Manually %sabling DRRS. %llu\n",
> +						val ? "en" : "dis", val);
> +
> +			intel_dp = enc_to_intel_dp(&encoder->base);
> +			if (val)
> +				intel_edp_drrs_enable(intel_dp,
> +							intel_crtc->config);
> +			else
> +				intel_edp_drrs_disable(intel_dp,
> +							intel_crtc->config);
> +		}
> +	}
> +	drm_modeset_unlock_all(dev);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}

It seems simple and effective. Simpler than I imagined...
My only question is about that HAS_DRRS and when to skip here...

> +
> +DEFINE_SIMPLE_ATTRIBUTE(i915_drrs_ctl_fops, NULL, i915_drrs_ctl_set, "%llu\n");
> +
>  static const struct drm_info_list i915_debugfs_list[] = {
>  	{"i915_capabilities", i915_capabilities, 0},
>  	{"i915_gem_objects", i915_gem_object_info, 0},
> @@ -4828,7 +4868,8 @@ static const struct i915_debugfs_files {
>  	{"i915_dp_test_active", &i915_displayport_test_active_fops},
>  	{"i915_guc_log_control", &i915_guc_log_control_fops},
>  	{"i915_hpd_storm_ctl", &i915_hpd_storm_ctl_fops},
> -	{"i915_ipc_status", &i915_ipc_status_fops}
> +	{"i915_ipc_status", &i915_ipc_status_fops},
> +	{"i915_drrs_ctl", &i915_drrs_ctl_fops}
>  };
>  
>  int i915_debugfs_register(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> -- 
> 2.7.4
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2017-11-17 18:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1505724732-17529-1-git-send-email-lohith.bs@intel.com>
2017-09-18 19:54 ` [PATCH] Idleness DRRS: Rodrigo Vivi
2017-09-19 10:46   ` Ramalingam C
2017-09-19 18:12     ` Rodrigo Vivi
2017-10-31  9:20       ` [PATCH 0/2] DRRS coverage in frontbuffer tracking IGT Ramalingam C
2017-10-31  9:20         ` [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: Runtime disable for eDP DRRS Ramalingam C
2017-10-31 18:57           ` Rodrigo Vivi
2017-11-01 16:44             ` C, Ramalingam
2017-11-07 18:38               ` [PATCH v2 " Ramalingam C
2017-11-17 18:53                 ` Rodrigo Vivi [this message]
2017-11-19 14:55                   ` C, Ramalingam
2017-11-21 20:59                     ` Rodrigo Vivi
2017-10-31  9:20         ` [PATCH 2/2] i915/drrs/debugfs: module param and psr status Ramalingam C
2017-11-07 18:40           ` [PATCH v2 2/2] i915/drrs/debugfs: crtc id " Ramalingam C
2017-11-17 18:56             ` Rodrigo Vivi
2017-11-20  3:39               ` C, Ramalingam
2017-11-20  4:23               ` [PATCH v3] i915/drrs/debugfs: psr status info addition Ramalingam C
2017-11-21 20:56                 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2017-10-31  9:20         ` [PATCH i-g-t] tests/kms_frontbuffer_tracking: Idleness DRRS coverage Ramalingam C
2017-11-10 16:22           ` [PATCH i-g-t] Idleness DRRS: Lohith BS
2017-12-06 15:13             ` [PATCH i-g-t v8] tests/kms_frontbuffer_tracking: Including DRRS test coverage Lohith BS
2017-12-06 18:30               ` Paulo Zanoni
2017-12-11 13:12               ` [PATCH i-g-t v9] " Lohith BS
2018-01-01 13:45                 ` [PATCH i-g-t v10] " Lohith BS
2018-01-02 20:34                   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2018-01-03 16:02                     ` Bs, Lohith
2018-01-03 15:02                   ` [PATCH i-g-t v11] " Lohith BS
2018-01-03 19:21                     ` Rodrigo Vivi
2018-01-03 22:14                       ` Ramalingam C
2018-01-05 11:40                     ` [PATCH i-g-t v12] " Lohith BS
2018-01-05 17:55                       ` Rodrigo Vivi
2018-01-06 10:48                         ` Ramalingam C
2018-01-06 13:37                           ` Ramalingam C
2018-01-10 14:47                       ` [PATCH i-g-t v13] " Lohith BS
2018-01-10 18:15                         ` Rodrigo Vivi
2018-01-11  5:27                           ` Ramalingam C
2018-01-11 20:22                             ` Rodrigo Vivi
2018-01-11  8:40                         ` Daniel Vetter
2018-01-17  5:05                         ` Ramalingam C
2017-10-31  9:28       ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for series starting with [1/2] drm/i915: Runtime disable for eDP DRRS Patchwork
2017-10-31  9:48       ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2017-10-31 10:33       ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: warning for tests/kms_frontbuffer_tracking: Idleness DRRS coverage Patchwork
2017-11-08  7:26       ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [v2,1/2] drm/i915: Runtime disable for eDP DRRS (rev3) Patchwork
2017-11-08  8:11       ` ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: warning " Patchwork
2017-11-10 16:49       ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: warning for tests/kms_frontbuffer_tracking: Idleness DRRS coverage (rev2) Patchwork
2017-11-20  4:46       ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: warning for series starting with [v2,1/2] drm/i915: Runtime disable for eDP DRRS (rev4) Patchwork
2017-12-06 16:32       ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: warning for tests/kms_frontbuffer_tracking: Idleness DRRS coverage (rev3) Patchwork
2017-12-11 15:56       ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for tests/kms_frontbuffer_tracking: Idleness DRRS coverage (rev4) Patchwork
2017-12-11 17:11       ` ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2017-12-28 15:59       ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [v2,1/2] drm/i915: Runtime disable for eDP DRRS (rev4) Patchwork
2017-12-28 16:45       ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2018-01-02 10:37       ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for tests/kms_frontbuffer_tracking: Idleness DRRS coverage (rev5) Patchwork
2018-01-02 13:26       ` ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2018-01-03 15:30       ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for tests/kms_frontbuffer_tracking: Idleness DRRS coverage (rev6) Patchwork
2018-01-03 18:49       ` ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2018-01-05 12:04       ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for tests/kms_frontbuffer_tracking: Idleness DRRS coverage (rev7) Patchwork
2018-01-05 13:25       ` ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2018-01-10 15:11       ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for tests/kms_frontbuffer_tracking: Idleness DRRS coverage (rev8) Patchwork
2018-01-10 16:14       ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2017-09-19 10:14 ` [PATCH] Idleness DRRS: Ramalingam C

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20171117185352.3gbnlmlsydr6e5xs@intel.com \
    --to=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com \
    --cc=ramalingam.c@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox