public inbox for intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
To: matthew.s.atwood@intel.com
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/dp: Correctly mask DP_TRAINING_AUX_RD_INTERVAL values for DP 1.4
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2018 13:22:55 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180314202255.GO3945@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1521049208-5910-1-git-send-email-matthew.s.atwood@intel.com>

On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 10:40:08AM -0700, matthew.s.atwood@intel.com wrote:
> From: Matt Atwood <matthew.s.atwood@intel.com>
> 
> DP_TRAINING_AUX_RD_INTERVAL with DP 1.3 spec changed bit scheeme from 8
> bits to 7 in DPCD 0x000e. The 8th bit is used to identify extended
> receiver capabilities. For panels that use this new feature wait interval
> would be increased by 512 ms, when spec is max 16 ms. This behavior is
> described in table 2-158 of DP 1.4 spec address 0000eh.
> 
> With the introduction of DP 1.4 spec main link clock recovery was
> standardized to 100 us regardless of TRAINING_AUX_RD_INTERVAL value.
> 
> To avoid breaking panels that are not spec compiant we now warn on
> invalid values.
> 
> V2: commit title/message, masking all 7 bits, warn on out of spec values.
> V3: commit message, make link train clock recovery follow DP 1.4 spec.
> V4: style changes
> V5: typo
> V6: print statement revisions, DP_REV to DPCD_REV, comment correction
> 
> Signed-off-by: Matt Atwood <matthew.s.atwood@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c | 18 ++++++++++++++----
>  include/drm/drm_dp_helper.h     |  6 ++++++
>  2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
> index adf79be..392e92e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
> @@ -119,18 +119,28 @@ u8 drm_dp_get_adjust_request_pre_emphasis(const u8 link_status[DP_LINK_STATUS_SI
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_dp_get_adjust_request_pre_emphasis);
>  
>  void drm_dp_link_train_clock_recovery_delay(const u8 dpcd[DP_RECEIVER_CAP_SIZE]) {
> -	if (dpcd[DP_TRAINING_AUX_RD_INTERVAL] == 0)
> +	int rd_interval = dpcd[DP_TRAINING_AUX_RD_INTERVAL] & DP_TRAINING_AUX_RD_MASK;
> +
> +	if (rd_interval > 4)
> +		DRM_DEBUG_KMS("AUX interval %d, out of range (max 4)\n", rd_interval);
> +
> +	if (rd_interval == 0 || (dpcd[DP_DPCD_REV] >= DP_REV_14))

s/DP_REV_14/DPCD_REV_14 right?

>  		udelay(100);
>  	else
> -		mdelay(dpcd[DP_TRAINING_AUX_RD_INTERVAL] * 4);
> +		mdelay(rd_interval * 4);
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_dp_link_train_clock_recovery_delay);
>  
>  void drm_dp_link_train_channel_eq_delay(const u8 dpcd[DP_RECEIVER_CAP_SIZE]) {
> -	if (dpcd[DP_TRAINING_AUX_RD_INTERVAL] == 0)
> +	int rd_interval = dpcd[DP_TRAINING_AUX_RD_INTERVAL] & DP_TRAINING_AUX_RD_MASK;
> +
> +	if (rd_interval > 4)
> +		DRM_DEBUG_KMS("AUX interval %d, out of range (max 4)\n", rd_interval);
> +
> +	if (rd_interval == 0)
>  		udelay(400);
>  	else
> -		mdelay(dpcd[DP_TRAINING_AUX_RD_INTERVAL] * 4);
> +		mdelay(rd_interval * 4);
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_dp_link_train_channel_eq_delay);
>  
> diff --git a/include/drm/drm_dp_helper.h b/include/drm/drm_dp_helper.h
> index da58a42..9afea9f 100644
> --- a/include/drm/drm_dp_helper.h
> +++ b/include/drm/drm_dp_helper.h
> @@ -64,6 +64,11 @@
>  /* AUX CH addresses */
>  /* DPCD */
>  #define DP_DPCD_REV                         0x000
> +# define DPCD_REV_10                        0x10
> +# define DPCD_REV_11                        0x11
> +# define DPCD_REV_12                        0x12
> +# define DPCD_REV_13                        0x13
> +# define DPCD_REV_14                        0x14
>  
>  #define DP_MAX_LINK_RATE                    0x001
>  
> @@ -118,6 +123,7 @@
>  # define DP_DPCD_DISPLAY_CONTROL_CAPABLE     (1 << 3) /* edp v1.2 or higher */
>  
>  #define DP_TRAINING_AUX_RD_INTERVAL         0x00e   /* XXX 1.2? */
> +# define DP_TRAINING_AUX_RD_MASK            0x7F    /* XXX 1.2 */
>  
>  #define DP_ADAPTER_CAP			    0x00f   /* 1.2 */
>  # define DP_FORCE_LOAD_SENSE_CAP	    (1 << 0)
> -- 
> 2.7.4
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2018-03-14 20:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1520029558-12219-1-git-send-email-matthew.s.atwood@intel.com>
2018-03-06 18:37 ` [PATCH] drm/dp: Correctly mask DP_TRAINING_AUX_RD_INTERVAL values for DP 1.4 matthew.s.atwood
2018-03-06 19:21   ` Benson Leung
2018-03-06 23:24   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2018-03-07  0:24     ` Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
2018-03-07  0:41       ` [Intel-gfx] " Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
2018-03-07  1:36       ` Manasi Navare
2018-03-07  2:13         ` Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
2018-03-07 22:06           ` Rodrigo Vivi
2018-03-07 22:20             ` [Intel-gfx] " Manasi Navare
2018-03-06 20:08 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2018-03-07  0:43 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2018-03-07 23:44 ` [PATCH] " matthew.s.atwood
2018-03-07 23:58   ` Ilia Mirkin
2018-03-08  0:18   ` Manasi Navare
2018-03-08  0:13 ` matthew.s.atwood
2018-03-08  0:36   ` Benson Leung
2018-03-08  0:28 ` matthew.s.atwood
2018-03-08  0:49   ` Benson Leung
2018-03-08  7:22   ` [Intel-gfx] " Jani Nikula
2018-03-09 23:49     ` Atwood, Matthew S
2018-03-12 19:39       ` Rodrigo Vivi
2018-03-14 17:40 ` matthew.s.atwood
2018-03-14 20:22   ` Rodrigo Vivi [this message]
2018-03-16 11:47   ` kbuild test robot
2018-03-14 20:20 ` matthew.s.atwood
2018-03-14 20:59   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2018-03-15 21:08 ` matthew.s.atwood
2018-03-16  0:39   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2018-03-16 23:10   ` kbuild test robot
2018-03-17  3:34   ` Benson Leung
2018-03-16 16:54 matthew.s.atwood
2018-03-19 19:13 ` Jani Nikula
2018-03-23 16:04   ` matthew.s.atwood
2018-03-27 13:03     ` kbuild test robot
2018-03-20  0:56 ` kbuild test robot
2018-03-20  1:26 ` kbuild test robot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180314202255.GO3945@intel.com \
    --to=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=matthew.s.atwood@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox