From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>,
Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/cnl: Don't get separate AUX power domain ref for DP PSR
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2018 19:13:51 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180621161351.GR20518@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180621155830.11311-2-imre.deak@intel.com>
On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 06:58:30PM +0300, Imre Deak wrote:
> After the previous patch we don't need to get an explicit AUX power
> reference for PSR functionality, since we hold now an AUX reference
> whenever the main link is active on any DP ports.
>
> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
> Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.h | 1 -
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c | 41 ---------------------------------
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c | 3 ---
> 3 files changed, 45 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.h
> index dfb02da73ac8..29501bf368b2 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.h
> @@ -198,7 +198,6 @@ enum intel_display_power_domain {
> POWER_DOMAIN_AUX_D,
> POWER_DOMAIN_AUX_E,
> POWER_DOMAIN_AUX_F,
> - POWER_DOMAIN_AUX_IO_A,
> POWER_DOMAIN_GMBUS,
> POWER_DOMAIN_MODESET,
> POWER_DOMAIN_GT_IRQ,
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> index d4cd19fea148..eecdd8b5b5e0 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> @@ -56,43 +56,6 @@
> #include "intel_drv.h"
> #include "i915_drv.h"
>
> -static inline enum intel_display_power_domain
> -psr_aux_domain(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> -{
> - /* CNL HW requires corresponding AUX IOs to be powered up for PSR.
> - * However, for non-A AUX ports the corresponding non-EDP transcoders
> - * would have already enabled power well 2 and DC_OFF. This means we can
> - * acquire a wider POWER_DOMAIN_AUX_{B,C,D,F} reference instead of a
> - * specific AUX_IO reference without powering up any extra wells.
> - * Note that PSR is enabled only on Port A even though this function
> - * returns the correct domain for other ports too.
> - */
> - return intel_dp->aux_ch == AUX_CH_A ? POWER_DOMAIN_AUX_IO_A :
> - intel_dp->aux_power_domain;
Hmm. Isn't this going to prevent DC5 during PSR?
> -}
> -
> -static void psr_aux_io_power_get(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> -{
> - struct intel_digital_port *intel_dig_port = dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp);
> - struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(intel_dig_port->base.base.dev);
> -
> - if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) < 10)
> - return;
> -
> - intel_display_power_get(dev_priv, psr_aux_domain(intel_dp));
> -}
> -
> -static void psr_aux_io_power_put(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> -{
> - struct intel_digital_port *intel_dig_port = dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp);
> - struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(intel_dig_port->base.base.dev);
> -
> - if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) < 10)
> - return;
> -
> - intel_display_power_put(dev_priv, psr_aux_domain(intel_dp));
> -}
> -
> void intel_psr_irq_control(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, bool debug)
> {
> u32 debug_mask, mask;
> @@ -595,8 +558,6 @@ static void hsw_psr_enable_source(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev);
> enum transcoder cpu_transcoder = crtc_state->cpu_transcoder;
>
> - psr_aux_io_power_get(intel_dp);
> -
> /* Only HSW and BDW have PSR AUX registers that need to be setup. SKL+
> * use hardcoded values PSR AUX transactions
> */
> @@ -717,8 +678,6 @@ static void hsw_psr_disable(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> else
> WARN_ON(I915_READ(EDP_PSR_CTL) & EDP_PSR_ENABLE);
> }
> -
> - psr_aux_io_power_put(intel_dp);
> }
>
> /**
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
> index de3a81034f77..58a8f07eafa4 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
> @@ -132,8 +132,6 @@ intel_display_power_domain_str(enum intel_display_power_domain domain)
> return "AUX_E";
> case POWER_DOMAIN_AUX_F:
> return "AUX_F";
> - case POWER_DOMAIN_AUX_IO_A:
> - return "AUX_IO_A";
> case POWER_DOMAIN_GMBUS:
> return "GMBUS";
> case POWER_DOMAIN_INIT:
> @@ -1872,7 +1870,6 @@ void intel_display_power_put(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> BIT_ULL(POWER_DOMAIN_INIT))
> #define CNL_DISPLAY_AUX_A_POWER_DOMAINS ( \
> BIT_ULL(POWER_DOMAIN_AUX_A) | \
> - BIT_ULL(POWER_DOMAIN_AUX_IO_A) | \
> BIT_ULL(POWER_DOMAIN_INIT))
> #define CNL_DISPLAY_AUX_B_POWER_DOMAINS ( \
> BIT_ULL(POWER_DOMAIN_AUX_B) | \
> --
> 2.13.2
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-06-21 16:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-21 15:58 [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/ddi: Get AUX power domain for DP main link too Imre Deak
2018-06-21 15:58 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/cnl: Don't get separate AUX power domain ref for DP PSR Imre Deak
2018-06-21 16:13 ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2018-06-21 16:31 ` Imre Deak
2018-06-21 17:03 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series starting with [1/2] drm/i915/ddi: Get AUX power domain for DP main link too Patchwork
2018-06-21 17:18 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2018-06-21 17:37 ` [PATCH 1/2] " Ville Syrjälä
2018-06-21 18:18 ` Imre Deak
2018-06-21 18:54 ` Manasi Navare
2018-06-21 18:57 ` Imre Deak
2018-06-21 17:40 ` Ville Syrjälä
2018-06-21 18:19 ` Imre Deak
2018-06-22 1:18 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for series starting with [1/2] " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180621161351.GR20518@intel.com \
--to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com \
--cc=imre.deak@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox