From: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
To: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>,
Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/cnl: Don't get separate AUX power domain ref for DP PSR
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2018 19:31:58 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180621163158.GB10533@ideak-desk.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180621161351.GR20518@intel.com>
On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 07:13:51PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 06:58:30PM +0300, Imre Deak wrote:
> > After the previous patch we don't need to get an explicit AUX power
> > reference for PSR functionality, since we hold now an AUX reference
> > whenever the main link is active on any DP ports.
> >
> > Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> > Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
> > Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.h | 1 -
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c | 41 ---------------------------------
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c | 3 ---
> > 3 files changed, 45 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.h
> > index dfb02da73ac8..29501bf368b2 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.h
> > @@ -198,7 +198,6 @@ enum intel_display_power_domain {
> > POWER_DOMAIN_AUX_D,
> > POWER_DOMAIN_AUX_E,
> > POWER_DOMAIN_AUX_F,
> > - POWER_DOMAIN_AUX_IO_A,
> > POWER_DOMAIN_GMBUS,
> > POWER_DOMAIN_MODESET,
> > POWER_DOMAIN_GT_IRQ,
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> > index d4cd19fea148..eecdd8b5b5e0 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> > @@ -56,43 +56,6 @@
> > #include "intel_drv.h"
> > #include "i915_drv.h"
> >
> > -static inline enum intel_display_power_domain
> > -psr_aux_domain(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> > -{
> > - /* CNL HW requires corresponding AUX IOs to be powered up for PSR.
> > - * However, for non-A AUX ports the corresponding non-EDP transcoders
> > - * would have already enabled power well 2 and DC_OFF. This means we can
> > - * acquire a wider POWER_DOMAIN_AUX_{B,C,D,F} reference instead of a
> > - * specific AUX_IO reference without powering up any extra wells.
> > - * Note that PSR is enabled only on Port A even though this function
> > - * returns the correct domain for other ports too.
> > - */
> > - return intel_dp->aux_ch == AUX_CH_A ? POWER_DOMAIN_AUX_IO_A :
> > - intel_dp->aux_power_domain;
>
> Hmm. Isn't this going to prevent DC5 during PSR?
Yep, it would. So we still need a separate AUX_IO domain which we would
take during encoder enabling, whereas the AUX domain - which prevents DC
states - would be used only for AUX transfers.
>
> > -}
> > -
> > -static void psr_aux_io_power_get(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> > -{
> > - struct intel_digital_port *intel_dig_port = dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp);
> > - struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(intel_dig_port->base.base.dev);
> > -
> > - if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) < 10)
> > - return;
> > -
> > - intel_display_power_get(dev_priv, psr_aux_domain(intel_dp));
> > -}
> > -
> > -static void psr_aux_io_power_put(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> > -{
> > - struct intel_digital_port *intel_dig_port = dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp);
> > - struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(intel_dig_port->base.base.dev);
> > -
> > - if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) < 10)
> > - return;
> > -
> > - intel_display_power_put(dev_priv, psr_aux_domain(intel_dp));
> > -}
> > -
> > void intel_psr_irq_control(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, bool debug)
> > {
> > u32 debug_mask, mask;
> > @@ -595,8 +558,6 @@ static void hsw_psr_enable_source(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> > struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev);
> > enum transcoder cpu_transcoder = crtc_state->cpu_transcoder;
> >
> > - psr_aux_io_power_get(intel_dp);
> > -
> > /* Only HSW and BDW have PSR AUX registers that need to be setup. SKL+
> > * use hardcoded values PSR AUX transactions
> > */
> > @@ -717,8 +678,6 @@ static void hsw_psr_disable(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> > else
> > WARN_ON(I915_READ(EDP_PSR_CTL) & EDP_PSR_ENABLE);
> > }
> > -
> > - psr_aux_io_power_put(intel_dp);
> > }
> >
> > /**
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
> > index de3a81034f77..58a8f07eafa4 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
> > @@ -132,8 +132,6 @@ intel_display_power_domain_str(enum intel_display_power_domain domain)
> > return "AUX_E";
> > case POWER_DOMAIN_AUX_F:
> > return "AUX_F";
> > - case POWER_DOMAIN_AUX_IO_A:
> > - return "AUX_IO_A";
> > case POWER_DOMAIN_GMBUS:
> > return "GMBUS";
> > case POWER_DOMAIN_INIT:
> > @@ -1872,7 +1870,6 @@ void intel_display_power_put(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> > BIT_ULL(POWER_DOMAIN_INIT))
> > #define CNL_DISPLAY_AUX_A_POWER_DOMAINS ( \
> > BIT_ULL(POWER_DOMAIN_AUX_A) | \
> > - BIT_ULL(POWER_DOMAIN_AUX_IO_A) | \
> > BIT_ULL(POWER_DOMAIN_INIT))
> > #define CNL_DISPLAY_AUX_B_POWER_DOMAINS ( \
> > BIT_ULL(POWER_DOMAIN_AUX_B) | \
> > --
> > 2.13.2
>
> --
> Ville Syrjälä
> Intel
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-06-21 16:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-21 15:58 [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/ddi: Get AUX power domain for DP main link too Imre Deak
2018-06-21 15:58 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/cnl: Don't get separate AUX power domain ref for DP PSR Imre Deak
2018-06-21 16:13 ` Ville Syrjälä
2018-06-21 16:31 ` Imre Deak [this message]
2018-06-21 17:03 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series starting with [1/2] drm/i915/ddi: Get AUX power domain for DP main link too Patchwork
2018-06-21 17:18 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2018-06-21 17:37 ` [PATCH 1/2] " Ville Syrjälä
2018-06-21 18:18 ` Imre Deak
2018-06-21 18:54 ` Manasi Navare
2018-06-21 18:57 ` Imre Deak
2018-06-21 17:40 ` Ville Syrjälä
2018-06-21 18:19 ` Imre Deak
2018-06-22 1:18 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for series starting with [1/2] " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180621163158.GB10533@ideak-desk.fi.intel.com \
--to=imre.deak@intel.com \
--cc=dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com \
--cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox