From: Tarun Vyas <tarun.vyas@intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com, rodrigo.vivi@intel.com
Subject: [PATCH] drm/i915/psr: Lockless version of psr_wait_for_idle
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2018 18:03:21 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180622010322.92851-1-tarun.vyas@intel.com> (raw)
This is a lockless version of the exisiting psr_wait_for_idle().
We want to wait for PSR to idle out inside intel_pipe_update_start.
At the time of a pipe update, we should never race with any psr
enable or disable code, which is a part of crtc enable/disable. So,
we can live w/o taking any psr locks at all.
The follow up patch will use this lockless wait inside pipe_update_
start to wait for PSR to idle out before checking for vblank evasion.
Even if psr is never enabled, psr2_enabled will be false and this
function will wait for PSR1 to idle out, which should just return
immediately, so a very short (~1-2 usec) wait for cases where PSR
is disabled.
Signed-off-by: Tarun Vyas <tarun.vyas@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h | 1 +
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 20 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
index 578346b8d7e2..a48aad0f99bf 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
@@ -1920,6 +1920,7 @@ void intel_psr_compute_config(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state);
void intel_psr_irq_control(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, bool debug);
void intel_psr_irq_handler(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u32 psr_iir);
+void psr_wait_for_idle_lockless(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
/* intel_runtime_pm.c */
int intel_power_domains_init(struct drm_i915_private *);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
index aea81ace854b..425147444f69 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
@@ -757,6 +757,25 @@ void intel_psr_disable(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
cancel_work_sync(&dev_priv->psr.work);
}
+void psr_wait_for_idle_lockless(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
+{
+ i915_reg_t reg;
+ u32 mask;
+ int err;
+
+ if (dev_priv->psr.psr2_enabled) {
+ reg = EDP_PSR2_STATUS;
+ mask = EDP_PSR2_STATUS_STATE_MASK;
+ } else {
+ reg = EDP_PSR_STATUS;
+ mask = EDP_PSR_STATUS_STATE_MASK;
+ }
+
+ err = intel_wait_for_register(dev_priv, reg, mask, EDP_PSR_STATUS_STATE_IDLE, 25);
+ if (err)
+ DRM_ERROR("Timed out waiting for PSR Idle for pipe update\n");
+}
+
static bool psr_wait_for_idle(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
{
struct intel_dp *intel_dp;
--
2.13.5
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next reply other threads:[~2018-06-22 1:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-22 1:03 Tarun Vyas [this message]
2018-06-22 1:03 ` [PATCH v3] drm/i915: Wait for PSR exit before checking for vblank evasion Tarun Vyas
2018-06-22 1:52 ` Dhinakaran Pandiyan
2018-06-22 3:02 ` kbuild test robot
2018-06-22 1:27 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915/psr: Lockless version of psr_wait_for_idle (rev2) Patchwork
2018-06-22 1:49 ` [PATCH] drm/i915/psr: Lockless version of psr_wait_for_idle Dhinakaran Pandiyan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180622010322.92851-1-tarun.vyas@intel.com \
--to=tarun.vyas@intel.com \
--cc=dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox